Raising an out-of-bounds panic is confusing. There's no indication
that the underlying problem is a race.
The runtime already does a pretty good job of detecting this kind of
race (modification while iterating). We might as well just reorganize
a bit to avoid the out-of-bounds panic.
Fixes#33275
Change-Id: Icdd337ad2eb3c84f999db0850ec1d2ff2c146b6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191197
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
- only convert literal strings if there were no syntax errors
(some of the conversion routines exit if there is an error)
- mark nodes for literals with syntax errors to avoid follow-on
errors
- don't attempt to import packages whose path had syntax errors
Fixes#32133.
Change-Id: I1803ad48c65abfecf6f48ddff1e27eded5e282c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192437
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The existing pointer comparison optimizations
don't include pointer arithmetic. Add them.
These rules trigger a few times in std cmd, while compiling:
time.Duration.String
cmd/go/internal/tlog.NodeHash
crypto/tls.ticketKeyFromBytes (3 times)
crypto/elliptic.(*p256Point).p256ScalarMult (15 times!)
crypto/elliptic.initTable
These weird comparisons occur when using the copy builtin,
which does a pointer comparison between src and dst.
This also happens to fix#32454, by optimizing enough
early on that all values can be eliminated.
Fixes#32454
Change-Id: I799d45743350bddd15a295dc1e12f8d03c11d1c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/180940
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The original report in #5172 was that cmd/compile was generating bogus
follow-on error messages when typechecking a struct failed. Instead of
fixing those follow-on error messages, golang.org/cl/9614044 suppress all
follow-on error messages after struct typecheck fails. We should
continue emitting error messages instead.
While at it, also add the test case for original report.
Fixes#33947
Change-Id: I4a5c6878977128abccd704350a12df743631c7bf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191944
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Complex type is the only TIDEAL that lack of support for all comparison
operators. When rewriting constant comparison into literal node, that
missing cause compiler raise an internal error.
Checking the operator is available for complex type before that fix the
problem.
We can make this check works more generally if there's more type lack of
supporting all comparison operators added, but it does not seem to be
happened, so just check explicitly for complex only.
Fixes#32723
Change-Id: I4938b1bdcbcdae9a9d87436024984bd2ab12995e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183459
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
typecheck only set n.Type.Nod for declared type, and leave it nil for
anonymous types, type alias. It leads to compiler crashes, because
n.Type.Nod is nil at the time dowidth was called.
Fixing it by set n.Type.Nod right after n.Type initialization if n.Op is
OTYPE.
When embedding interface cycles involve in type alias, it also helps
pointing the error message to the position of the type alias
declaration, instead of position of embedding interface.
Fixes#31872
Change-Id: Ia18391e987036a91f42ba0c08b5506f52d07f683
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191540
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Testcase for a gollvm bug (assert in Llvm_backend::materializeComposite).
Updates golang/go#33020.
Change-Id: Icdf5b4b2b6eb55a5b48a31a61c41215b1ae4cf01
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191743
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The syntax of a shifted operation does not have a "$" sign for
the shift amount. Remove it.
Change-Id: I50782fe942b640076f48c2fafea4d3175be8ff99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192100
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This will improve liveness analysis slightly, the same logic as
isdirectiface curently does. In:
type T struct {
m map[int]int
}
v := T{}
v.m = make(map[int]int)
T is considered "fat", now it is not. So assigning to v.m is considered
to clobber the entire v.
This is follow up of CL 179057.
Change-Id: Id6b4807b8e8521ef5d8bcb14fedb6dceb9dbf18c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/179578
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
In interface-to-concrete comparisons, we are short circuiting on the interface
value's dynamic type before evaluating the concrete expression for side effects,
causing concrete expression won't panic at runtime, while it should.
To fix it, evaluating the RHS of comparison before we do the short-circuit.
We also want to prioritize panics in the LHS over the RHS, so evaluating
the LHS too.
Fixes#32187
Change-Id: I15b58a523491b7fd1856b8fdb9ba0cba5d11ebb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/178817
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Prep for subsequent CLs to remove old escape analysis pass.
This CL removes -newescape=true from tests that use it, and deletes
tests that use -newescape=false. (For history, see CL 170447.)
Notably, this removes escape_because.go without any replacement, but
this is being tracked by #31489.
Change-Id: I6f6058d58fff2c5d210cb1d2713200cc9f501ca7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/187617
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Extend the optimization introduced in CL 141118 to the wasm architecture.
And for reference, the rules trigger 212 times while building std and cmd
$GOOS=js GOARCH=wasm gotip build std cmd
$grep -E "Wasm.rules:44(1|2|3|4)" rulelog | wc -l
212
Updates #26498
Change-Id: I153684a2b98589ae812b42268da08b65679e09d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/185477
Run-TryBot: Agniva De Sarker <agniva.quicksilver@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
Use the shiftIsBounded function to generate more efficient
Shift instructions.
Updates #25167
Change-Id: Id350f8462dc3a7ed3bfed0bcbea2860b8f40048a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/182558
Run-TryBot: Agniva De Sarker <agniva.quicksilver@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
This CL optimizes math.bits.TrailingZeros16 on 386 with
a pair of BSFL and ORL instrcutions.
The case TrailingZeros16-4 of the benchmark test in
math/bits shows big improvement.
name old time/op new time/op delta
TrailingZeros16-4 1.55ns ± 1% 0.87ns ± 1% -43.87% (p=0.000 n=50+49)
Change-Id: Ia899975b0e46f45dcd20223b713ed632bc32740b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/189277
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL add test cases for the unary FP negative
operation.
Change-Id: I54e7292ca9df05da0c2b113adefc97ee1e94c6e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190937
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL performs the branchelim optimization on WASM with its
select instruction. And the total size of pkg/js_wasm decreased
about 80KB by this optimization.
Change-Id: I868eb146120a1cac5c4609c8e9ddb07e4da8a1d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190957
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Because the Node AST represents references to declared objects (e.g.,
variables, packages, types, constants) by directly pointing to the
referred object, we don't have use-position info for these objects.
For switch statements with duplicate cases, we report back where the
first duplicate value appeared. However, due to the AST
representation, if the value was a declared constant, we mistakenly
reported the constant declaration position as the previous case
position.
This CL reports back against the 'case' keyword's position instead, if
there's no more precise information available to us.
It also refactors code to emit the same "previous at" error message
for duplicate values in map literals.
Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for the test case.
Fixes#33460.
Change-Id: Iec69542ccd4aad594dde8df02d1b880a422c5622
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188901
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The assembly output for x & c == c, where c is power of 2:
MOVQ "".set+8(SP), AX
ANDQ $8, AX
CMPQ AX, $8
SETEQ "".~r2+24(SP)
With optimization using bitset:
MOVQ "".set+8(SP), AX
BTL $3, AX
SETCS "".~r2+24(SP)
output less than 1 instruction.
However, there is no speed improvement:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AllBitSet-8 0.35ns ± 0% 0.35ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Fixes#31904
Change-Id: I5dca4e410bf45716ed2145e3473979ec997e35d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/175957
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Array accesses with index types smaller than the machine word size may
involve a sign or zero extension of the index value before bounds
checking. Currently, this defeats prove because the facts about the
original index value don't flow through the sign/zero extension.
This CL fixes this by looking back through value-preserving sign/zero
extensions when adding facts via Update and, where appropriate, applying
the same facts using the pre-extension value. This fix is enhanced by
also looking back through value-preserving extensions within
ft.isNonNegative to infer whether the extended value is known to be
non-negative. Without this additional isNonNegative enhancement, this
logic is rendered significantly less effective by the limitation
discussed in the next paragraph.
In Update, the application of facts to pre-extension values is limited
to cases where the domain of the new fact is consistent with the type of
the pre-extension value. There may be cases where this cross-domain
passing of facts is valid, but distinguishing them from the invalid
cases is difficult for me to reason about and to implement.
Assessing which cases to allow requires details about the context and
inferences behind the fact being applied which are not available
within Update. Additional difficulty arises from the fact that the SSA
does not curently differentiate extensions added by the compiler for
indexing operations, extensions added by the compiler for implicit
conversions, or explicit extensions from the source.
Examples of some cases that would need to be filtered correctly for
cross-domain facts:
(1) A uint8 is zero-extended to int for indexing (a value-preserving
zeroExt). When, if ever, can signed domain facts learned about the int be
applied to the uint8?
(2) An int8 is sign-extended to int16 (value-preserving) for an equality
comparison. Equality comparison facts are currently always learned in both
the signed and unsigned domains. When, if ever, can the unsigned facts
learned about the int16, from the int16 != int16 comparison, be applied
to the original int8?
This is an alternative to CL 122695 and CL 174309. Compared to CL 122695,
this CL differs in that the facts added about the pre-extension value will
pass through the Update method, where additional inferences are processed
(e.g. fence-post implications, see #29964). CL 174309 is limited to bounds
checks, so is narrower in application, and makes the code harder to read.
Fixes#26292.
Fixes#29964.
Fixes#15074
Removes 238 bounds checks from std/cmd.
Change-Id: I1f87c32ee672bfb8be397b27eab7a4c2f304893f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174704
Run-TryBot: Zach Jones <zachj1@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Don't skip closing parentheses of any kind after a missing
expression. They are likely part of the lexical construct
enclosing the expression.
Fixes#33386.
Change-Id: Ic0abc2037ec339a345ec357ccc724b7ad2a64c00
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188502
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Quietly drop duplicate methods inherited from embedded interfaces if
they have an identical signature to existing methods.
Updates #6977.
Change-Id: I144151cb7d99695f12b555c0db56207993c56284
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/187519
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Quietly drop duplicate methods from embedded interfaces
if they have an identical signature to existing methods.
Instead of adjusting the prior syntax-based only method set
computation where methods don't have signature information
(and thus where de-duplication according to the new rules
would have been somewhat tricky to get right), this change
completely rewrites interface method set computation, taking
a page from the cmd/compiler's implementation. In a first
pass, when type-checking interfaces, explicit methods and
embedded interfaces are collected, but the interfaces are
not "expanded", that is the final method set computation
is done lazily, either when needed for method lookup, or
at the end of type-checking.
While this is a substantial rewrite, it allows us to get
rid of the separate (duplicate and delicate) syntactical
method set computation and generally simplifies checking
of interface types significantly. A few (esoteric) test
cases now have slightly different error messages but all
tests that are accepted by cmd/compile are also accepted
by go/types.
(This is a replacement for golang.org/cl/190258.)
Updates #6977.
Change-Id: Ic8b9321374ab4f617498d97c12871b69d1119735
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191257
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
There is real (albeit generated) code that exceeds the limit.
Fixes#33555
Change-Id: I668e85825d3d2a471970e869abe63f3492213cc1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/189697
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The compiler can crash if the compiled code tries to
unconditionally read from a nil pointer. This should cause
the generated binary to panic, not the compiler.
Fixes#33438
Change-Id: Ic8fa89646d6968e2cc4e27da0ad9286662f8bc49
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188760
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
We shouldn't mask to desired registers if we haven't masked out all the
forbidden registers yet. In this path we haven't masked out the nospill
registers yet. If the resulting mask contains only nospill registers, then
allocReg fails.
This can only happen on resultNotInArgs-marked instructions, which exist
only on the ARM64, MIPS, MIPS64, and PPC64 ports.
Maybe there's a better way to handle resultNotInArgs instructions.
But for 1.13, this is a low-risk fix.
Fixes#33355
Change-Id: I1082f78f798d1371bde65c58cc265540480e4fa4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188178
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Gccgo generates incorrect type equality functions for some types.
CL 185817 fixes it. This CL adds a test.
Updates #33062.
Change-Id: Id445c5d44a437512c65c46a029e49b7fc32e4d89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/185818
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Updates #33013
Change-Id: I3db062b37860bb0c6c99a553408b47cf0313531e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/185517
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Gccgo CL 184998 added optimizations for one- and two-case select
statements. But it didn't handle break statement in the select
case correctly. The fix is CL 185519. This CL adds a test.
Change-Id: Ide1b199f106172b41dd77c1f6e0d662fccdd8cc5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/185520
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
For OLSH/ORSH, the right node is not a uintptr-typed. However,
unsafeValue still be called recursively for it, causing the
compiler crashes.
To fixing, the right node only needs to be evaluated
for side-effects, so just discard its value.
Fixes#32959
Change-Id: I34d5aa0823a0545f6dad1ec34774235ecf11addc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/185039
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Test case that causes incorrect compiler error from gccgo.
Updates #32922
Change-Id: I59432a8e8770cf03eda293f6d110c081c18fa88b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/184918
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This CL adds a test for gccgo bug #32901: not all the type
descriptors are registered and thus deduplicated with types
created by reflection. It needs a few levels of indirect imports
to trigger this bug.
Updates #32901.
Change-Id: Idbd89bedd63fea746769f2687f3f31c9767e5ec0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/184718
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Test case that caused a compiler crash in gofrontend, related to
exporting inlinable function bodies.
Updates #32778
Change-Id: Iacf1753825d5359da43e5e281189876d4c3dd3c9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183851
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
It ends up making two similar types, [N]uint8 of both
alg and noalg varieties. Comparsions between the two then
don't come out equal when they should.
In particular, the type *[N]uint8 has an Elem pointer which
must point to one of the above two types; it can't point to both.
Thus allocating a *[N]uint8 and dereferencing it might be a
different type than a [N]uint8.
The fix is easy. Making a small test for this is really hard. It
requires that both a argless defer and the test be imported by a
common parent package. This is why a main binary doesn't see this
issue, but a test does (as Agniva noticed), because there's a wrapper
package that imports both the test and the defer.
Types like [N]uint8 don't really need to be marked noalg anyway,
as the generated code (if any) will be shared among all
vanilla memory types of the same size.
Fixes#32595
Change-Id: If7b77fa6ed56cd4495601c3f90170682d853b82f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/182357
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Adjusting gofrontend error messages for GCC standards causes the
messages expected by this test to be adjusted slightly: the gofrontend
code now quotes the _ identifier.
Change-Id: I55ee2ae70b4da3bf7a421ceea80b254dd17601a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183477
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
A missing operand to mergePoint caused lower to place values
in the wrong blocks.
Includes test, belt+suspenders to do both ssa check and verify
the output (was is how the bug was originally observed).
The fixed bug here is very likely present in Go versions
1.9-1.12 on amd64 and s390x
Fixes#32680.
Change-Id: I63e702c4c40602cb795ef71b1691eb704d38ccc7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183059
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
For int8, int16, and int32, comparing their unsigned value to MaxInt64
to determine non-negativity doesn't make sense, because they have
negative values whose unsigned representation is smaller than that.
Fix is simply to compare with the appropriate upper bound based on the
value type's size.
Fixes#32560.
Change-Id: Ie7afad7a56af92bd890ba5ff33c86d1df06cfd9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/181797
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This reverts CL 180761
Reason for revert: Reinstate the stack-allocated defer CL.
There was nothing wrong with the CL proper, but stack allocation of defers exposed two other issues.
Issue #32477: Fix has been submitted as CL 181258.
Issue #32498: Possible fix is CL 181377 (not submitted yet).
Change-Id: I32b3365d5026600069291b068bbba6cb15295eb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/181378
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The logic for detecting deferreturn calls is wrong.
We used to look for a relocation whose symbol is runtime.deferreturn
and has an offset of 0. But on some architectures, the relocation
offset is not zero. These include arm (the offset is 0xebfffffe) and
s390x (the offset is 6).
This ends up setting the deferreturn offset at 0, so we end up using
the entry point live map instead of the deferreturn live map in a
frame which defers and then segfaults.
Instead, use the IsDirectCall helper to find calls.
Fixes#32477
Update #6980
Change-Id: Iecb530a7cf6eabd7233be7d0731ffa78873f3a54
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/181258
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Shrinks the size of things that can be stack allocated from
10M to 128k for declared variables and from 64k to 16k for
implicit allocations (new(T), &T{}, etc).
Usage: "go build -gcflags -smallframes hello.go"
An earlier GOEXPERIMENT version of this caused only one
problem, when a gc-should-detect-oversize-stack test no
longer had an oversized stack to detect. The change was
converted to a flag to make it easier to access (for
diagnosing "long" GC-related single-thread pauses) and to
remove interference with the test.
Includes test to verify behavior.
Updates #27732.
Change-Id: I1255d484331e77185e07c78389a8b594041204c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/180817
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
