This should provide simple name completions for comments
above exported variables.
Can be activated with `ctrl+space` within a comment.
Pretty new, so all help is welcome.
Fixes#34010
Change-Id: I1c8f71baa3beaa22ec5fd9fd4a531284a8d125f3
GitHub-Last-Rev: a9868eb69dc587cb4579268b2c3ae46932702641
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#166
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/197879
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The existing implementation did not suggest struct field names
when running completion from within a slice literal of
pointers. Now, struct field names are suggested in that case.
Fixesgolang/go#33211
Change-Id: I6028420a9a789846b070fcc6e45ec89dc4d898d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192277
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fix the following issues:
- We were trying to complete struct literal field names for
selector expressions (e.g. "Foo{a.B<>}"). Now we only complete field
names in this case if the expression is an *ast.Ident.
- We weren't including lexical completions in cases where you might be
completing a field name or a variable name (e.g. "Foo{A<>}").
I refactored composite literal logic to live mostly in one place. Now
enclosingCompositeLiteral computes all the bits of information related
to composite literals. The expected type, completion, and snippet code
make use of those precalculated facts instead of redoing the work.
Change-Id: I29fc808544382c3c77f0bba1843520e04f38e79b
GitHub-Last-Rev: 3489062be342ab0f00325d3b3ae9ce681df7cf2e
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#96
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/176601
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Improve expected type determination for the following cases:
- search back further through ast path to handle cases where the
position's node is more than two nodes from the ancestor node with
type information
- generate expected type for return statements
- wrap and unwrap pointerness from expected type when position is
preceded by "*" (dereference) or "&" (reference) operators,
respectively
- fix some false positive expected types when completing the "Fun"
(left) side of a CallExpr
Change-Id: I907ee3e405bd8420031a7b03329de5df1c3493b9
GitHub-Last-Rev: 20a0ac9bf2b5350494c6738f5960676cc50fb454
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#93
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/174477
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When the value of a composite literal key/value pair was unparsable,
you were getting completions for the composite literal keys instead of
values. For example "struct { foo int }{foo: []<>" was completing to
the field name "foo". This was because the leaf ast.Node at the cursor
was the composite literal itself, and our go-back-one-character logic
was not happening because the preceding character's node
was *ast.BadExpr, not *ast.Ident. Fix by always generating the ast
path for the character before the cursor's position. I couldn't find
any cases where this broke completion.
I also added expected type detection for the following composite
literal cases:
- array/slice literals
- struct literals (both implicit and explicit field names)
- map keys and values
Fixesgolang/go#29153
Change-Id: If8cf678cbd743a970f52893fcf4a9b83ea06d7e9
GitHub-Last-Rev: f385705cc05eb98132e20561451dbb8c39b68519
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#86
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/173099
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
New tests include cases for anonymous structs, composite literals,
ranking of results in binary expressions, and import cycles.
Change-Id: Ic02e84e09101bb9873fc1705bba2594d655bb45b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153443
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
