This CL adds intrinsics for the 64-bit addition and subtraction
functions in math/bits. These intrinsics use the condition code
to propagate the carry or borrow bit.
To make the carry chains more efficient I've removed the
'clobberFlags' property from most of the load and store
operations. Originally these ops did clobber flags when using
offsets that didn't fit in a signed 20-bit integer, however
that is no longer true.
As with other platforms the intrinsics are faster when executed
in a chain rather than a loop because currently we need to spill
and restore the carry bit between each loop iteration. We may
be able to reduce the need to do this on s390x (e.g. by using
compare-and-branch instructions that do not clobber flags) in the
future.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Add64 1.21ns ± 2% 2.03ns ± 2% +67.18% (p=0.000 n=7+10)
Add64multiple 2.98ns ± 3% 1.03ns ± 0% -65.39% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Sub64 1.23ns ± 4% 2.03ns ± 1% +64.85% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Sub64multiple 3.73ns ± 4% 1.04ns ± 1% -72.28% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
Change-Id: I913bbd5e19e6b95bef52f5bc4f14d6fe40119083
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174303
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
golang.org/cl/174498 add ONAME case to isStaticCompositeLiteral, to
detect global variable as compile-time constant.
It does report wrong for struct field, e.g:
o := one{i: two{i: 42}.i}
field i in two{i: 42} was reported as static composite literal, while it
should not.
In general, adding ONAME case for isStaticCompositeLiteral is probably
wrong.
Fixes#31782
Change-Id: Icde7d43bbb002b75df5c52b948b7126a4265e07b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174837
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
golang.org/cl/174498 removes dynamic map entry handling in maplit, by
filtering the static entry only. It panics if it see a dynamic entry.
It relies on order to remove all dynamic entries.
But after recursively call order on the statics, some static entries
become dynamic, e.g OCONVIFACE node:
type i interface {
j()
}
type s struct{}
func (s) j() {}
type foo map[string]i
var f = foo{
"1": s{},
}
To fix it, we recursively call order on each static entry, if it changed
to dynamic, put entry to dynamic then.
Fixes#31777
Change-Id: I1004190ac8f2d1eaa4beb6beab989db74099b025
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174777
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This enables more of the testcases in memcombine for ppc64le,
and adds more detail to some existing.
Change-Id: Ic522a1175bed682b546909c96f9ea758f8db247c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174737
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
"Division by invariant integers using multiplication" paper
by Granlund and Montgomery contains a method for directly computing
divisibility (x%c == 0 for c constant) by means of the modular inverse.
The method is further elaborated in "Hacker's Delight" by Warren Section 10-17
This general rule can compute divisibilty by one multiplication, and add
and a compare for odd divisors and an additional rotate for even divisors.
To apply the divisibility rule, we must take into account
the rules to rewrite x%c = x-((x/c)*c) and (x/c) for c constant on the first
optimization pass "opt". This complicates the matching as we want to match
only in the cases where the result of (x/c) is not also needed.
So, we must match on the expanded form of (x/c) in the expression x == c*(x/c)
in the "late opt" pass after common subexpresion elimination.
Note, that if there is an intermediate opt pass introduced in the future we
could simplify these rules by delaying the magic division rewrite to "late opt"
and matching directly on (x/c) in the intermediate opt pass.
On amd64, the divisibility check is 30-45% faster.
name old time/op new time/op delta`
DivisiblePow2constI64-4 0.83ns ± 1% 0.82ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.079 n=5+4)
DivisibleconstI64-4 2.68ns ± 1% 1.87ns ± 0% -30.33% (p=0.000 n=5+4)
DivisibleWDivconstI64-4 2.69ns ± 1% 2.71ns ± 3% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
DivisiblePow2constI32-4 1.15ns ± 1% 1.15ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.238 n=5+4)
DivisibleconstI32-4 2.24ns ± 1% 1.20ns ± 0% -46.48% (p=0.016 n=5+4)
DivisibleWDivconstI32-4 2.27ns ± 1% 2.27ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.683 n=5+5)
DivisiblePow2constI16-4 0.81ns ± 1% 0.82ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.135 n=5+5)
DivisibleconstI16-4 2.11ns ± 2% 1.20ns ± 1% -42.99% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivisibleWDivconstI16-4 2.23ns ± 0% 2.27ns ± 2% +1.79% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
DivisiblePow2constI8-4 0.81ns ± 1% 0.81ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.286 n=5+5)
DivisibleconstI8-4 2.13ns ± 3% 1.19ns ± 1% -43.84% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivisibleWDivconstI8-4 2.23ns ± 1% 2.25ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.183 n=5+5)
Fixes#30282Fixes#15806
Change-Id: Id20d78263a4fdfe0509229ae4dfa2fede83fc1d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173998
Run-TryBot: Brian Kessler <brian.m.kessler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In the statement x = a[i], the index panic should appear to come from
the line number of the '['. Previous to this CL we sometimes used the
line number of the '=' instead.
Fixes#29504
Change-Id: Ie718fd303c1ac2aee33e88d52c9ba9bcf220dea1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174617
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Any code that imports the testing package forces the testing flags to be
defined, even in non-test binaries. People work around this today by
defining a copy of the testing.TB interface just to avoid importing
testing.
Fix this by moving flag registration into a new function, testing.Init.
Delay calling Init until the testing binary begins to run, in
testing.MainStart.
Init is exported for cases where users need the testing flags to be
defined outside of a "go test" context. In particular, this may be
needed where testing.Benchmark is called outside of a test.
Fixes#21051
Change-Id: Ib7e02459e693c26ae1ba71bbae7d455a91118ee3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173722
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change creates an intrinsic for Add64 for ppc64x and adds a
testcase for it.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Add64-160 1.90ns ±40% 2.29ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.119 n=5+5)
Add64multiple-160 6.69ns ± 2% 2.45ns ± 4% -63.47% (p=0.016 n=4+5)
Change-Id: I9abe6fb023fdf62eea3c9b46a1820f60bb0a7f97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173758
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
"Division by invariant integers using multiplication" paper
by Granlund and Montgomery contains a method for directly computing
divisibility (x%c == 0 for c constant) by means of the modular inverse.
The method is further elaborated in "Hacker's Delight" by Warren Section 10-17
This general rule can compute divisibilty by one multiplication and a compare
for odd divisors and an additional rotate for even divisors.
To apply the divisibility rule, we must take into account
the rules to rewrite x%c = x-((x/c)*c) and (x/c) for c constant on the first
optimization pass "opt". This complicates the matching as we want to match
only in the cases where the result of (x/c) is not also available.
So, we must match on the expanded form of (x/c) in the expression x == c*(x/c)
in the "late opt" pass after common subexpresion elimination.
Note, that if there is an intermediate opt pass introduced in the future we
could simplify these rules by delaying the magic division rewrite to "late opt"
and matching directly on (x/c) in the intermediate opt pass.
Additional rules to lower the generic RotateLeft* ops were also applied.
On amd64, the divisibility check is 25-50% faster.
name old time/op new time/op delta
DivconstI64-4 2.08ns ± 0% 2.08ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.881 n=5+5)
DivisibleconstI64-4 2.67ns ± 0% 2.67ns ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
DivisibleWDivconstI64-4 2.67ns ± 0% 2.67ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.683 n=5+5)
DivconstU64-4 2.08ns ± 1% 2.08ns ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
DivisibleconstU64-4 2.77ns ± 1% 1.55ns ± 2% -43.90% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivisibleWDivconstU64-4 2.99ns ± 1% 2.99ns ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
DivconstI32-4 1.53ns ± 2% 1.53ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
DivisibleconstI32-4 2.23ns ± 0% 2.25ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.167 n=5+5)
DivisibleWDivconstI32-4 2.27ns ± 1% 2.27ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.429 n=5+5)
DivconstU32-4 1.78ns ± 0% 1.78ns ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=4+5)
DivisibleconstU32-4 2.52ns ± 2% 1.26ns ± 0% -49.96% (p=0.000 n=5+4)
DivisibleWDivconstU32-4 2.63ns ± 0% 2.85ns ±10% +8.29% (p=0.016 n=4+5)
DivconstI16-4 1.54ns ± 0% 1.54ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.333 n=4+5)
DivisibleconstI16-4 2.10ns ± 0% 2.10ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.571 n=4+5)
DivisibleWDivconstI16-4 2.22ns ± 0% 2.23ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.556 n=4+5)
DivconstU16-4 1.09ns ± 0% 1.01ns ± 1% -7.74% (p=0.000 n=4+5)
DivisibleconstU16-4 1.83ns ± 0% 1.26ns ± 0% -31.52% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivisibleWDivconstU16-4 1.88ns ± 0% 1.89ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.365 n=5+5)
DivconstI8-4 1.54ns ± 1% 1.54ns ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
DivisibleconstI8-4 2.10ns ± 0% 2.11ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.238 n=5+4)
DivisibleWDivconstI8-4 2.22ns ± 0% 2.23ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.762 n=5+5)
DivconstU8-4 0.92ns ± 1% 0.94ns ± 1% +2.65% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivisibleconstU8-4 1.66ns ± 0% 1.26ns ± 1% -24.28% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivisibleWDivconstU8-4 1.79ns ± 0% 1.80ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.079 n=4+5)
A follow-up change will address the signed division case.
Updates #30282
Change-Id: I7e995f167179aa5c76bb10fbcbeb49c520943403
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/168037
Run-TryBot: Brian Kessler <brian.m.kessler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For powers of two (c=1<<k), the divisibility check x%c == 0 can be made
just by checking the trailing zeroes via a mask x&(c-1) == 0 even for signed
integers. This avoids division fix-ups when just divisibility check is needed.
To apply this rule, we match on the fixed-up version of the division. This is
neccessary because the mod and division rewrite rules are already applied
during the initial opt pass.
The speed up on amd64 due to elimination of unneccessary fix-up code is ~55%:
name old time/op new time/op delta
DivconstI64-4 2.08ns ± 0% 2.09ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.730 n=5+5)
DivisiblePow2constI64-4 1.78ns ± 1% 0.81ns ± 1% -54.66% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivconstU64-4 2.08ns ± 0% 2.08ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.683 n=5+5)
DivconstI32-4 1.53ns ± 0% 1.53ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.968 n=4+5)
DivisiblePow2constI32-4 1.79ns ± 1% 0.81ns ± 1% -54.97% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivconstU32-4 1.78ns ± 1% 1.80ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.206 n=5+5)
DivconstI16-4 1.54ns ± 2% 1.54ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.238 n=5+4)
DivisiblePow2constI16-4 1.78ns ± 0% 0.81ns ± 1% -54.72% (p=0.000 n=4+5)
DivconstU16-4 1.00ns ± 5% 1.01ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.119 n=5+5)
DivconstI8-4 1.54ns ± 0% 1.54ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.571 n=4+5)
DivisiblePow2constI8-4 1.78ns ± 0% 0.82ns ± 8% -53.71% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivconstU8-4 0.93ns ± 1% 0.93ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.643 n=5+5)
A follow-up CL will address the general case of x%c == 0 for signed integers.
Updates #15806
Change-Id: Iabadbbe369b6e0998c8ce85d038ebc236142e42a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173557
Run-TryBot: Brian Kessler <brian.m.kessler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
We already skipped blank field initialization in non-global contexts.
This change makes the global context treatment match.
Fixes#31546
Change-Id: I40acce49b0a9deb351ae0da098f4c114e425ec63
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173723
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This pair of packages caused a crash in gollvm, due to a glitch in the
way the front end handles empty/non-name parameters for functions that
are inline candidates.
Updates #31637.
Change-Id: I571c0658a00974dd36025e571638c0c836a3cdfd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173617
Run-TryBot: Benny Siegert <bsiegert@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This reverts CL 168038 (git 68819fb6d2)
Reason for revert: Doesn't work on 32 bit archs.
Change-Id: Idec9098060dc65bc2f774c5383f0477f8eb63a3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173442
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
For powers of two (c=1<<k), the divisibility check x%c == 0 can be made
just by checking the trailing zeroes via a mask x&(c-1)==0 even for signed
integers. This avoids division fixups when just divisibility check is needed.
To apply this rule the generic divisibility rule for A%B = A-(A/B*B) is disabled
on the "opt" pass, but this does not affect generated code as this rule is applied
later.
The speed up on amd64 due to elimination of unneccessary fixup code is ~55%:
name old time/op new time/op delta
DivconstI64-4 2.08ns ± 0% 2.07ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.079 n=5+5)
DivisiblePow2constI64-4 1.78ns ± 1% 0.81ns ± 1% -54.55% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivconstU64-4 2.08ns ± 0% 2.08ns ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
DivconstI32-4 1.53ns ± 0% 1.53ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
DivisiblePow2constI32-4 1.79ns ± 1% 0.81ns ± 4% -54.75% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DivconstU32-4 1.78ns ± 1% 1.78ns ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5)
DivconstI16-4 1.54ns ± 2% 1.53ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.333 n=5+4)
DivisiblePow2constI16-4 1.78ns ± 0% 0.79ns ± 1% -55.39% (p=0.000 n=4+5)
DivconstU16-4 1.00ns ± 5% 0.99ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.730 n=5+5)
DivconstI8-4 1.54ns ± 0% 1.53ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.714 n=4+5)
DivisiblePow2constI8-4 1.78ns ± 0% 0.80ns ± 0% -55.06% (p=0.000 n=5+4)
DivconstU8-4 0.93ns ± 1% 0.95ns ± 1% +1.72% (p=0.024 n=5+5)
A follow-up CL will address the general case of x%c == 0 for signed integers.
Updates #15806
Change-Id: I0d284863774b1bc8c4ce87443bbaec6103e14ef4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/168038
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In 31618, we end up comparing the is-stmt-ness of positions
to repurpose real instructions as inline marks. If the is-stmt-ness
doesn't match, we end up not being able to remove the inline mark.
Always use statement-full positions to do the matching, so we
always find a match if there is one.
Also always use positions that are statements for inline marks.
Fixes#31618
Change-Id: Idaf39bdb32fa45238d5cd52973cadf4504f947d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173324
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Stack object generation code was always using the local package name
for its symbol. Normally that doesn't matter, as we usually only
compile functions in the local package. But for wrappers, the compiler
generates functions which live in other packages. When there are two
other packages with identical functions to wrap, the same name appears
twice, and the compiler goes boom.
Fixes#31252
Change-Id: I7026eebabe562cb159b8b6046cf656afd336ba25
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171464
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The special case logic for go/defer arguments in Escape.call was
scattered around a bit and was somewhat inconsistently handled across
different types of function calls and parameters. This CL pulls the
logic out into a separate callStmt method that's used uniformly for
all kinds of function calls and arguments.
Fixes#31573.
Change-Id: Icdcdf611754dc3fcf1af7cb52879fb4b73a7a31f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173019
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
A check in inl.go to prevent inlining of functions calling
either getcallerpc or getcallersp does not work when these
functions are intrinsics. Swap checks to fix.
Includes test.
No bug, this was discovered in the course of a ridiculous
experiment with inlining.
Change-Id: Ie1392523bb89882d586678f2674e1a4eadc5e431
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172217
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Casp1 is implemented in Go on js/wasm, so escape analysis correctly
determines that the "old" parameter does not escape (which is good).
Unfortunately, test/run.go doesn't have a way to indicate that ERROR
messages are optional, and cmd/compile only emits diagnostics for "var
x int" when it's moved to the heap; not when it stays on the stack.
To accomodate that this test currently passes on some GOARCHes but not
others, rewrite the Casp1 test to use "x := new(int)" and allow both
"new(int) escapes to heap" or "new(int) does not escape".
Updates #31525.
Change-Id: I40150a7ff9042f184386ccdb2d4d428f63e8ba4f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172602
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The //go:noescape directive says that arguments don't leak at all,
which is too aggressive of a claim for functions that return pointers
derived from their parameters.
Remove the directive for now. Long term fix will require a new
directive that allows more fine-grained control over escape analysis
information supplied for functions implemented in assembly.
Also, update the BAD comments in the test cases for Loadp: we really
want that *ptr leaks to the result parameter, not that *ptr leaks to
the heap.
Updates #31525.
Change-Id: Ibfa61f2b70daa7ed3223056b57eeee777eef2e31
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172578
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Cherry pointed out this case in review for CL 136496. That CL was
slightly too aggressive, and I likely would have made the same mistake
if I tried it myself.
Updates #27772.
Change-Id: I1fafabb9f8d9aba0494aa71333a4e17cf1bac5c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172421
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
There weren't any tests to make sure these work correctly, and this
led to escape analysis regressions in both linux/s390x and js/wasm.
The underlying issue that cmd/compile is only getting some of these
correct because escape analysis doesn't understand //go:linkname is
still present, but at least this addresses the fragility aspect.
Updates #15283.
Change-Id: I546aee1899d098b2e3de45e9b33c3ca22de485f8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172420
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
In typecheckclosure, a xfunc node will be put to xtop. But that node can
be shared between multiple closures, like in a const declaration group:
const (
x = unsafe.Sizeof(func() {})
y
)
It makes a xfunc node appears multiple times in xtop, causing duplicate
initLSym run.
To fix this issue, we only do typecheck for xfunc one time, and setup
closure node earlier in typecheckclosure process.
Fixes#30709
Change-Id: Ic924a157ee9f3e5d776214bef5390849ddc8aab9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172298
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The new escape analysis implementation tries to emit debugging
diagnostics that are compatible with the existing implementation, but
there's a handful of cases that are easier to handle by updating the
test expectations instead.
For regress tests that need updating, the original file is copied to
oldescapeXXX.go.go with -newescape=false added to the //errorcheck
line, while the file is updated in place with -newescape=true and new
test requirements.
Notable test changes:
1) escape_because.go looks for a lot of detailed internal debugging
messages that are fairly particular to how esc.go works and that I
haven't attempted to port over to escape.go yet.
2) There are a lot of "leaking param: x to result ~r1 level=-1"
messages for code like
func(p *int) *T { return &T{p} }
that were simply wrong. Here &T must be heap allocated unconditionally
(because it's being returned); and since p is stored into it, p
escapes unconditionally too. esc.go incorrectly reports that p escapes
conditionally only if the returned pointer escaped.
3) esc.go used to print each "leaking param" analysis result as it
discovered them, which could lead to redundant messages (e.g., that a
param leaks at level=0 and level=1). escape.go instead prints
everything at the end, once it knows the shortest path to each sink.
4) esc.go didn't precisely model direct-interface types, resulting in
some values unnecessarily escaping to the heap when stored into
non-escaping interface values.
5) For functions written in assembly, esc.go only printed "does not
escape" messages, whereas escape.go prints "does not escape" or
"leaking param" as appropriate, consistent with the behavior for
functions written in Go.
6) 12 tests included "BAD" annotations identifying cases where esc.go
was unnecessarily heap allocating something. These are all fixed by
escape.go.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: Iabc9eb14c94c9cadde3b183478d1fd54f013502f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170447
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For a failed interface conversion not in ",ok" form, getitab
calls itab.init to get the name of the missing method for the
panic message. itab.init will try to find the methods, populate
the method table as it goes. When some method is missing, it sets
itab.fun[0] to 0 before return. There is a small window that
itab.fun[0] could be non-zero.
If concurrently, another goroutine tries to do the same interface
conversion, it will read the same itab's fun[0]. If this happens
in the small window, it sees a non-zero fun[0] and thinks the
conversion succeeded, which is bad.
Fix the race by setting fun[0] to non-zero only when we know the
conversion succeeds. While here, also simplify the syntax
slightly.
Fixes#31419.
Change-Id: Ied34d3043079eb933e330c5877b85e13f98f1916
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171759
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
These new calls should not prevent NOSPLIT promotion, like the old ones.
These new calls should not prevent racefuncenter/exit removal.
(The latter was already true, as the new calls are not yet lowered
to StaticCalls at the point where racefuncenter/exit removal is done.)
Add tests to make sure we don't regress (again).
Fixes#31219
Change-Id: I3fb6b17cdd32c425829f1e2498defa813a5a9ace
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170639
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
Some var declarations return "extra expression" or "missing expression"
errors when they should return “assignment mismatch” instead. Change
the returned error messages to exhibit the desired behavior.
Fixes#30085.
Change-Id: I7189355fbb0f976d70100779db4f81a9ae64fb11
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/161558
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
"leaking closure reference" is redundant for similar reasons as "&x
escapes to heap" for OADDR nodes: the reference itself does not
allocate, and we already report when the referenced variable is moved
to heap.
"mark escaped content" is redundant with "leaking param content".
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: I1ab599cb1e8434f1918dd80596a70cba7dc8a0cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170321
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
For most nodes (e.g., OPTRLIT, OMAKESLICE, OCONVIFACE), escape
analysis prints "escapes to heap" or "does not escape" to indicate
whether that node's allocation can be heap or stack allocated.
These messages are also emitted for OADDR, even though OADDR does not
actually allocate anything itself. Moreover, it's redundant because
escape analysis already prints "moved to heap" diagnostics when an
OADDR node like "&x" causes x to require heap allocation.
Because OADDR nodes don't allocate memory, my escape analysis rewrite
doesn't naturally emit the "escapes to heap" / "does not escape"
diagnostics for them. It's also non-trivial to replicate the exact
semantics esc.go uses for OADDR.
Since there are so many of these messages, I'm disabling them in this
CL by themselves. I modified esc.go to suppress the Warnl calls
without any other behavior changes, and then used a shell script to
automatically remove any ERROR messages mentioned by run.go in
"missing error" or "no match for" lines.
Fixes#16300.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: I3993e2743c3ff83ccd0893f4e73b366ff8871a57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170319
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The bug in 29612 is that there are two similar-looking anonymous interface
types in two different packages, ./p1/ssa and ./p2/ssa:
v.(interface{ foo() }).foo()
These types should be treated differently because the unexported method
makes the types different (according to the spec).
But when generating the type descriptors for those two types, they
both have the name "interface { ssa.foo() }". They thus get the same
symbol, and the linker happily unifies them. It picks an arbitrary one
for the runtime to use, but that breaks conversions from concrete types
that have a foo method from the package which had its interface type
overwritten.
We need to encode the metadata symbol for unexported methods as package
path qualified (The same as we did in CL 27791 for struct fields).
So switching from FmtUnsigned to Fmtleft by default fixes the issue.
In case of generating namedata, FmtUnsigned is used.
The benchmark result ends up in no significant change of compiled binary
compare to the immediate parent.
Fixes#29612
Change-Id: I775aff91ae4a1bb16eb18a48d55e3b606f3f3352
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170157
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When branching at a bounds check for indexing or slicing ops, prove currently
only learns from the upper bound. On the positive branch, we currently learn
i < len(a) (or i <= len(a)) in both the signed and unsigned domains.
This CL makes prove also learn from the lower bound. Specifically, on the
positive branch from index or slicing ops, prove will now ALSO learn i >= 0 in
the signed domain (this fact is of no value in the unsigned domain).
The substantive change itself is only an additional call to addRestrictions,
though I've also inverted the nested switch statements around that call for the
sake of clarity.
This CL removes 92 bounds checks from std and cmd. It passes all tests and
shows no deltas on compilecmp.
Fixes#28885
Change-Id: I13eccc36e640eb599fa6dc5aa3be3c7d7abd2d9e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170121
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Would suggest extending capabilities (32-bit, unsigned, etc)
in separate CLs because prove bugs are so mystifying.
This implements the suggestion in this comment
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/104041/10/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/loopbce.go#164
for inferring properly bounded iteration for loops of the form
for i := K0; i < KNN-(K-1); i += K
for i := K0; i <= KNN-K; i += K
Where KNN is "known non negative" (i.e., len or cap) and K
is also not negative. Because i <= KNN-K, i+K <= KNN and
no overflow occurs.
Also handles decreasing case (K1 > 0)
for i := KNN; i >= K0; i -= K1
which works when MININT+K1 < K0
(i.e. MININT < K0-K1, no overflow)
Signed only, also only 64 bit for now.
Change-Id: I5da6015aba2f781ec76c4ad59c9c48d952325fdc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/136375
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Moșoi <alexandru@mosoi.ro>
Prove currently fails to remove bounds checks of the form:
if i >= 0 { // hint that i is non-negative
for i < len(data) { // i becomes Phi in the loop SSA
_ = data[i] // data[Phi]; bounds check!!
i++
}
}
addIndVarRestrictions fails to identify that the loop induction
variable, (Phi), is non-negative. As a result, the restrictions,
i <= Phi < len(data), are only added for the signed domain. When
testing the bounds check, addBranchRestrictions is similarly unable
to infer that Phi is non-negative. As a result, the restriction,
Phi >= len(data), is only added/tested for the unsigned domain.
This CL changes the isNonNegative method to utilise the factTable's
partially ordered set (poset). It also adds field factTable.zero to
allow isNonNegative to query the poset using the zero(0) constant
found or created early in prove.
Fixes#28956
Change-Id: I792f886c652eeaa339b0d57d5faefbf5922fe44f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/161437
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Typechecking treats all untyped numbers as integers for the purposes
of validating operators. However, when I refactoring constant
operation evalution in golang.org/cl/139901, I mistakenly interpreted
that the only invalid case that needed to be preserved was % (modulo)
on floating-point values.
This CL restores the other remaining cases that were dropped from that
CL. It also uses the phrasing "invalid operation" instead of "illegal
constant expression" for better consistency with the rest of
cmd/compile and with go/types.
Lastly, this CL extends setconst to recognize failed constant folding
(e.g., division by zero) so that we can properly mark those
expressions as broken rather than continuing forward with bogus values
that might lead to further spurious errors.
Fixes#31060.
Change-Id: I1ab6491371925e22bc8b95649f1a0eed010abca6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/169719
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Update the issue 30908 test to work with the no-opt builder
(this requires a corresponding change in the linker as well).
As part of this change, 'rundir' tests are now linked without
passing "-w" to the linker.
Updates #30908.
Fixes#31034.
Change-Id: Ic776e1607075c295e409e1c8230aaf55a79a6323
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/169161
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
CL 135377 introduces pass strings and slices to convT2{E,I} by value.
Before that CL, all types, except interface will be allocated temporary
address. The CL changes the logic that only constant and type which
needs address (determine by convFuncName) will be allocated.
It fails to cover the case where type is static composite literal.
Adding condition to check that case fixes the issue.
Also, static composite literal node implies constant type, so consttype
checking can be removed.
Fixes#30956
Change-Id: Ifc750a029fb4889c2d06e73e44bf85e6ef4ce881
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/168858
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Some special-case code paths in order.go didn't expect OCALLFUNC to
have Ninit; in particular, OAS2FUNC and ODEFER/OGO failed to call
o.init on their child OCALLFUNC node. This resulted in not all of the
AST being properly ordered.
This was noticed because order is responsible for introducing an
invariant around how OAPPEND is used, which is enforced by walk.
However, there were perhaps simpler cases (e.g., simple order of
evaluation) that were being silently miscompiled.
Fixes#31010.
Change-Id: Ib928890ab5ec2aebd8e30a030bc2b404387f9123
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/169257
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
New test case designed to mimic the code in issue 30908, which
features duplicate but non-indentical DWARF abstract subprogram DIEs.
Updates #30908.
Change-Id: Iacb4b53e6a988e46c801cdac236cef883c553f8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/168957
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For "rundir" tests, allow users to add in linker flags as well as
compiler flags, e.g.
// rundir -m -ldflags -w
The directive above will pass "-m" to the compiler on each package compilation
and "-w" to the linker for the final link.
In addition, if "-P" is specified with 'rundir', then for each compile
pass in "-p <X>" to set the packagepath explicitly, which is closer to
how the compiler is run by 'go build'.
Change-Id: I04720011a89d1bd8dcb4f2ccb4af1d74f6a01da1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/168977
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
It is possible that a "volatile" value (one that can be clobbered
by preparing args of a call) to be used in multiple write barrier
calls. We used to copy the volatile value right before each call.
But this doesn't work if the value is used the second time, after
the first call where it is already clobbered. Copy it before
emitting any call.
Fixes#30977.
Change-Id: Iedcc91ad848d5ded547bf37a8359c125d32e994c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/168677
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL instrinsifies Add64 with arm64 instruction sequence ADDS, ADCS
and ADC, and optimzes the case of carry chains.The CL also changes the
test code so that the intrinsic implementation can be tested.
Benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Add-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 2.090000ns +- 4% -16.40% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Add32-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 2.500000ns +- 0% ~ (all equal)
Add64-224 2.500000ns +- 0% 1.577778ns +- 2% -36.89% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Add64multiple-224 6.000000ns +- 0% 2.000000ns +- 0% -66.67% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: I6ee91c9a85c16cc72ade5fd94868c579f16c7615
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/159017
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
