This line of the inlining tuning experiment
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/109918/1/src/cmd/compile/internal/gc/inl.go#347
was incorrectly rewritten in a later patch to use the call
cost, not the panic cost, and thus the inlining of panic
didn't occur when it should. I discovered this when I
realized that tests should have failed, but didn't.
Fix is to make the correct change, and also to modify the
tests that this causes to fail. One test now asserts the
new normal, the other calls "ppanic" instead which is
designed to behave like panic but not be inlined.
Change-Id: I423bb7f08bd66a70d999826dd9b87027abf34cdf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/116656
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Calls to a closure held in a local, non-escaping,
variable can be inlined, provided the closure body
can be inlined and the variable is never written to.
The current implementation has the following limitations:
- closures with captured variables are not inlined because
doing so naively triggers invariant violation in the SSA
phase
- re-assignment check is currently approximated by checking
the Addrtaken property of the variable which should be safe
but may miss optimization opportunities if the address is
not used for a write before the invocation
Updates #15561
Change-Id: I508cad5d28f027bd7e933b1f793c14dcfef8b5a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65071
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugues Bruant <hugues.bruant@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Inlining refuses to inline bodies containing an actual function call, so that
if that call or a child uses runtime.Caller it cannot observe
the inlining.
However, inlining was also refusing to inline bodies that contained
function calls that were themselves inlined away. For example:
func f() int {
return f1()
}
func f1() int {
return f2()
}
func f2() int {
return 2
}
The f2 call in f1 would be inlined, but the f1 call in f would not,
because f1's call to f2 blocked the inlining, despite itself eventually
being inlined away.
Account properly for this kind of transitive inlining and enable.
Also bump the inlining budget a bit, so that the runtime's
heapBits.next is inlined.
This reduces the time for '6g *.go' in html/template by around 12% (!).
(For what it's worth, closing Chrome reduces the time by about 17%.)
Change-Id: If1aa673bf3e583082dcfb5f223e67355c984bfc1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5952
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Was not handling &x.y[0] and &x.y.z correctly where
y is an array or struct-valued field (not a pointer).
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6551059
Today, if run.go doesn't understand a test header line it just ignores
the test, making it too easy to write or edit tests that are not actually
being run.
- expand errorcheck to accept flags, so that bounds.go and escape*.go can run.
- create a whitelist of skippable tests in run.go; skipping others is an error.
- mark all skipped tests at top of file.
Update #4139.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6549054
