This change is the first step in handling golang/go#38136. Instead of
creating multiple diagnostic reports for type error analyzers, we add
suggested fixes to the existing reports. To match the analyzers for
FindAnalysisError, we add an ErrorMatch function to source.Analyzer.
This is not an ideal solution, but it was the best one I could come up
with without modifying the go/analysis API. analysisinternal could be
used for this purpose, but it seemed to complicated to be worth it, and
this is fairly simple. I think that go/analysis itself might need to be
extended for type error analyzers, but these temporary measures will
help us understand the kinds of features we need for type error
analyzers.
A follow-up CL might be to not add reports for type error analyzers
until the end of source.Diagnostic, which would remove the need for the
look-up.
Fixesgolang/go#38136
Change-Id: I25bc6396b09d49facecd918bf5591d2d5bdf1b3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226777
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
We need to search all transitive dependencies of a package, not just its
immediate imports.
Fixesgolang/go#38100
Change-Id: I15b4dbe226ba851691ca0c95460c3648ede32f04
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227030
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for type errors of the type "no result values expected". It will replace the return statment with an empty return statement.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I3885748dfc69a2d19f8e7a2e81f36f6d0a20d25b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223666
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for diagnostics that have an error message of the form "undeclared name: %s". It provides a quick fix to add a new variable with that name.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I6534ee79d1770d1a62bac169c3c7e52e2443f39e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222237
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
As part of investigating golang/go#38100, I noticed a few things that I
wanted to clean up. Mostly, for renames, we were calling
qualifiedObjAtProtocolPos twice, so I factored out a shared helper
function. I also added an error return for builtins so that callers
don't have to check.
Change-Id: I28c75c801cbec1611736af931cfa72befd219201
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225777
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
A common annoying mis-completion is as follows:
type foo struct {
field int
}
func (f foo) Field() int { return f.field }
func (f foo) logic() {
if f.f<>
}
Now at <> we prefer "field" over "Field()". Similarly:
type foo struct {
}
func (f foo) DoSomething() { }
func (f foo) doSomething() { }
func (f foo) logic() {
f.d<>
}
Now at <> we prefer "doSomething()" over "DoSomething()". All else
being equally, you normally want private objects over public objects
when the private objects are available.
The same logic is applied to deep completions so we prefer "c.foo.bar"
over "c.Foo().bar".
Change-Id: Ic91cba7721ddb1f2a30338037693ddcce8c621f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223877
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change fixes breadcrumbs when the cursor is inside of a method by making the method a top level symbol and removing it from the struct's hierarchy.
Fixesgolang/go#36949
Change-Id: I8da5f453a5c78ade1e7688fc4eeebf79ce96f1e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221819
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds support for recognizing a //go:generate directive
and offering a CodeLens that will then send a "generate" command to
the server to run "go generate" or "go generate ./...". Because
"go generate" can only be executed per package, there is no need to show
the CodeLens on top of every //go:generate comment. Therefore, only the
top directive will be considered.
The stdout/stderr of the go generate command will be piped to the logger
while stderr will also be sent to the editor as a window/showMessage
The user will only know when the process starts and when it ends so that they wouldn't
get bogged with a large number of message windows popping up. However, they can
check the logs for all the details.
If a user wants to cancel the "go generate" command, they will be able
to do so with a "Cancel" ActionItem that the server will offer to the client
Fixesgolang/go#37680
Change-Id: I89a9617521eab20859cb2215db133f34fda856c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222247
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The tests will not run because there is no workspacesymbol marker.
Therefore, restore testdata used in WorkspaceSymbols tests, and
initialize data so that the tests run even if the target of the marker
is 0.
Change-Id: I051b842183b7e23bb746cc282fc3921a90ca8df1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221617
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Now we properly offer "case" and "default" keyword completion in cases
like:
switch {
<>
}
First I had to add an AST fix for empty switch statements to move the
closing brace down. For example, say the user is completing:
switch {
ca<>
}
This gets parsed as:
switch {
}
Even if we manually recover the "ca" token, "<>" is not positioned
inside the switch statement anymore, so we don't know to offer "case"
and "default" candidates. To work around this, we move the closing
brace down one line yielding:
switch {
}
Second I had to add logic to manually extract the completion prefix
inside empty switch statements, and finally some logic to offer (only)
"case" and "default" candidates in empty switch statements.
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I624f17da1c5e73faf91fe5f69e872d86f1cf5482
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220579
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now we offer an error-check-and-return completion candidate when
appropriate:
func myFunc() (int, error) {
f, err := os.Open("foo")
<>
}
offers the candidate:
if err != nil {
return 0, <err>
}
where <> denotes a placeholder so you can easily alter "err".
The completion will only be offered when:
1. The position is in a function that returns an error as final result
value, and
2. The statement preceding position is an assignment whose final LHS
value is an error.
The completion will contain zero values for the non-error return values
as necessary.
Using the above example, the completion will be offered after the user
has typed:
i
if
if err
Basically the candidate will be offered after every keystroke as the
user types "if err".
I call this new type of completion a statement completion - perfect
for when you want to make a statement!
Change-Id: I0a330e1c1fa81a2757d3afc84c24e853f46f26b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221613
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Editors typically trigger completion automatically after ".". This
pops up annoying, useless completions after "..." variadic param, such
as "foo(bar...<>)". We now suppress completions in or directly after
the ellipsis.
Fixesgolang/go#37358.
Change-Id: I9fc94fbdf69429bd787bcb2c643f4f730e24154d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222200
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We now offer "range" keyword in the for loop init statement:
for i := r<> // offer "range" completion candidate
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I2e4c1db11c37127406c78191681c39b9dd3439f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220504
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Offer "struct", "interface", "map", "chan", and "func" keywords when
we expect a type. For example "var foo i<>" will offer "interface".
Because "struct" and "interface" are more often used when declaring
named types, they get a higher score in type declarations. Otherwise,
"map", "chan" and "func" get a higher score.
I also got rid of the special keyword scoring. Now keywords just use
stdScore and highScore. This makes the interplay with other types of
candidates more predictable. Keywords are offered in pretty limited
contexts, so I don't think they will be annoying.
Finally, keyword candidate score is now to be scaled properly based on
how well they match the prefix. Previously they weren't penalized for
not matching well, so there were probably some situations where
keywords were ranked too high.
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I0b659c00a8503cd72da28853dfe54fcb67f734ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220503
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds support for passing a span to cmd/suggested_fix.go, originally it would just take the filename and apply all the fixes for that file. Now, it can also take just a span within that file and only apply the fixes relevant to that span.
The //@suggestedfix marker now contains an extra parameter to specify which type of codeaction is expected.
Change-Id: I4e94b8dad719f990dc2d0ef3c50816f70f59f737
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222137
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adjusts where the start and end of the arguments list are when determining which parameter is the active paramter. Rather than use the first and last argument's position, we will use the start and ending parentheses.
Fixesgolang/go#37271
Change-Id: I70bc5c8b4bdb5242fc35a20e63b9a8860cb1d6bd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221817
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds an upgrade all dependencies codelens on the go.mod file if there are available upgrades.
Updates golang/go#36501
Change-Id: I86c1ae7e7a6dc01b7f5cd7eb18e5a11d96a3acc1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221108
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We were panicking when a LHS assignee's type was nil, such as:
// "foo" has not been declared
foo = 123
A recent refactoring changed (*completer).typeMatches() to no longer
gracefully handle a nil types.Type for its first parameter. That
behavior seems fine, so fix the problematic caller of typeMatches to
check for nil before calling.
Change-Id: Ie11e4a2d374ab1efbf6fd13fbe214e06d359fca0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221020
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Now "implementations" supports finding interfaces implemented by the
specified concrete type. This is the inverse of what "implementations"
normally does. There isn't currently a better place in LSP to put this
functionality. The reverse lookup isn't an important feature for most
languages because types often must explicitly declare what interfaces
they implement.
An argument can be made that this functionality fits better into find-
references, but it is still a stretch. Plus, that would require
find-references to search all packages instead of just transitive
dependents.
Updates golang/go#35550.
Change-Id: I72dc78ef52b5bf501da2f39692e99cd304b5406e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219678
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The highlight tests imported golang.org/x/tools/internal/lsp/protocol
package, which doesn't exist when the testdata is set up in the test
harness. This causes gopls to try to reload the metadata for the
package. I'm not sure why this wasn't an issue before, since we should
re-run go/packages.Load every time we have missing dependencies.
Fixesgolang/go#37365
Change-Id: I8ebcbbf78b7e6fcdac9ab83bef3f5a0c9a50a361
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221107
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This change implements support for textDocument/documentLink when it comes to go.mod files.
Updates golang/go#36501
Change-Id: Ic0974e3e858dd1c8df54b7d7abee085bbcb6d4ee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219938
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Searching with an empty string shouldn't return every symbol in the
workspace -- nobody wants that. Limit to 100 results to avoid breaking
editors. (VS Code locks up for like 30 seconds on my workspace.)
Change-Id: I1e0be476e8eeaef9e69767bfa04a89d40bd3a6e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220939
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
I'm still not sure if we need to handle any other non-standard package
path apart from "command-line-arguments".
Also, a couple of staticcheck fixes.
Change-Id: I0bb3e60f6ffe104ff9027dbebb628020caaa1af4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220138
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
The code to check if a candidate object matches our candidate
inference had become complicated, messy, and in some cases incorrect.
The main source of the complexity is the "derived" expected and
candidate types. When considering a candidate object "foo", we also
consider "&foo", "foo()", and "*foo", as appropriate. On the expected
side of things, when completing the a variadic function parameter we
expect either the variadic slice type and the scalar element type.
The code had grown organically to handle the expanding concerns, but
that resulted in confused code that didn't handle the interplay
between the various facets of candidate inference.
For example, we were inappropriately invoking func candidates when
completing variadic args:
func foo(...func())
func bar() {}
foo(bar<>) // oops - expanded to "bar()"
and we weren't type matching functions properly as builtin args:
func myMap() map[string]int { ... }
delete(myM<>) // we weren't preferring (or invoking) "myMap()"
We also had methods like "typeMatches" which took both a "candidate"
object and a "candType" type, which doesn't make sense because the
candidate contains the type already.
Now instead we explicitly iterate over all the derived candidate and
expected types so they are treated the same. There are still some
warts left but I think this is a step in the right direction.
Change-Id: If84a84b34a8fb771a32231f7ab64ca192f611b3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218877
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This change updates Staticcheck to the newly released 2020.1.2.
Change-Id: I80606b9c993de2f504c0ca3ee68f695ec8bd50e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220477
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Add support for var/func/const/type/import keywords at the file scope.
I left out "package" because, currently, if you are completing
something that means you must already have a package declaration. The
main hurdle was that anything other than a decl keyword shows up as
an *ast.BadDecl at the file scope. To properly detect the prefix we
manually scan for the token containing the position.
I also made a couple small drive-by improvements:
- Also suggest "goto" and "type" keywords in functions.
- Allow completing directly before a comment, e.g. "foo<>//". I
needed this for a test that would have been annoying to write
otherwise.
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I290e7bdda9e66a16f996cdc291985a54bf375231
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217500
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This change fixes the regex that removes the versions for links so that tests will still run under GOPATH mode. It also removes a link for an import that needed to be downloaded.
Change-Id: I7ed4f500d1bd9d2136188d30952eedb8d8aee6e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220140
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change appends to the pkg.go.dev link the version of the module that is being used. To get this functionality, go/packages.Package now contains a module field which gets populated from the "go list" call. This module field is then used to get the version of the module that we are linking to.
Updates golang/go#36501
Change-Id: I9668a6da0fd3ec8f4cde017986419c8d28196765
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219079
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
internal/lsp/reset_golden.sh fails when golden file does not exist, so
skip loading the golden file on update.
Additionally, add the missing primarymod directory as the update
destination path so that golden files are placed under the primarymod
directory.
However, keep the location of summary.txt.golden in the same directory
as the primarymod directory.
As a result, some unnecessary data was deleted.
Change-Id: I98120c8b7d483174644600786fd30acdc2e4c52e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219577
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
We were crashing in cases like:
1: func foo() {
2: if b<> <EOF>
We were trying to get the line start position for line 3, but there is
no line 3. Fix by bailing out early if we are the last line in the
file because there is nothing to fix in that case.
Fixesgolang/go#37226.
Change-Id: I4ad5746d7b55bdcc2de57c04e972c15a61084faa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219498
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change adds a code lens for go.mod files that will let a user know if a module can be upgraded, once it is clicked gopls will run a command to update that module.
Updates golang/go#36501
Change-Id: Id22b8097ede4972cf73bc029ec927544a71b7150
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218557
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Dangling selectors such as:
func _() {
x.
}
var x struct { i int }
tend to wreak havoc on the AST. In the above example you didn't used
to get completions because the declaration of "x" was missing from the
AST.
We now work around this issue by inserting a "_" into the source code
before parsing to make the selector valid:
func _() {
x._ // <-- insert "_" here
}
var x struct { i int }
This makes completion work as expected because the declaration of "x"
is present in the AST.
I had to change fixAST() to be called before fixSrc() because
otherwise this new workaround in fixSrc() breaks the "accidental
keyword" countermeasures in fixAST().
Fixesgolang/go#31973.
Updates golang/go#31687.
Change-Id: Ia7ef6c045a9c71502d1b8b36f187ac9b8a85fe21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/216484
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change allows to use fuzzy or case-sensitive matchers in addition
to case-insensitive when searching for symbols.
Matcher is specified by UserOptions.Matcher just like Completion.
Updates golang/go#33844
Change-Id: I4000fb7984c75f0f41c38d740dbe164398032312
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218737
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
In cases like:
if i := foo<>
we get an *ast.BadExpr because the parser is expecting the condition
expression, but "i := foo" is not a valid expression. Now we move the
statement into the "init" field and add a dummy "cond" expression.
We also needed a slight tweak to our missing curly brace fix. Now we
insert an extra semicolon in cases like:
for i := 0; i < foo
yielding
for i := 0; i < foo;{}
The parser doesn't like having only two clauses in the three clause
"for" statement.
Updates golang/go#31687.
Change-Id: I12d51e0d8af03436741227753f8e71452a463b05
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/216483
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In cases like:
func _() {
if fo<>
}
func foo() {}
Completing at "<>" does not include "foo" because the missing "if"
opening curly brace renders the rest of the file unparseable. "foo"
doesn't exist in the AST, so as far as gopls is concerned it doesn't
exist at all.
To fix this, we detect when a block is missing opening "{" and we
insert stub "{}" to make things parse better. This is a different kind
of fix than our previous *ast.BadExpr handling because we must reparse
the file after tweaking the source. After reparsing we maintain the
original syntax error so the user sees consistent error messages. This
also avoids having the "{}" spring into existence when the user
formats the file.
Fixesgolang/go#31907.
Updates golang/go#31687.
Change-Id: I95ba60a11f7dd23dc484c063b4fd7ad77daa4e08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/216482
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We were crashing in cases like:
var _ []byte = append([]byte{}, ""...<>)
We were type asserting the type of append's second param
to *types.Slice, but in this case it is a string (*types.Basic). Fix
by checking the type assert was successful.
Note that we still don't attempt to give string completions when
appending to a byte slice. We can add that special case later once
everyone is clamoring for it.
Change-Id: I1d2fbd7f538e580d33c2dab4ef127a88e16d7ced
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/219144
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now when we expect a type name at the cursor, we omit non-type name
completion candidates. For example:
inch := 1
var foo in<> // don't offer "inch"
I also added expected type name detection for value specs:
// Expect a type name at <>
var foo <>
Fixesgolang/go#32806.
Change-Id: I32477cb286d2050bac5ccc767f8a608124fa5acd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/216400
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Now we keep a count of how many times to dereference a candidate. For
example:
var foo ***int
var _ int = f<> // Now we offer "***foo" instead of "*foo".
Change-Id: I14edc40aeec6884399eceb3dd3b4f85dc74a773c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218580
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When completing a composite literal value, we were returning from
candidate inference before we recorded type modifiers such as prefix
"&" or "*". This was causing funny completions like:
type myStruct struct { s *myStruct }
myStruct{s: &mySt<> // completed to "&&myStruct{}"
Now we properly pick up on the "&" prefix so we know our literal
"myStruct{}" candidate does not need a "&".
Change-Id: I908936698cfedfef81bc0c1cbcd93e14dc00e3a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218377
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Currently we show up to ~100 unimported package names matching the
completion prefix. This isn't useful since, assuming the user even
wants an unimported package, they will just type more to narrow it
down rather than scroll through 100 options. Having so many candidates
also slows things down due to per-candidate overhead in gopls and in
the LSP client. Now we instead limit to 5 unimported package names.
Unimported package members, on the other hand, make sense to list
many. The user may want to scroll through because they don't remember
the name of what they are looking for. I left the max value at 100.
Change-Id: I00e11fa0420758f8db6c7049f80fa156773a5ee6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218879
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When completing members on a type checked, unimported package, you get
fully typed members. That means you get deep completions. Because we
downrank the initial unimported package members so much, any deep
completions were dominating the rankings. For example
context.Back<>
yielded "context.Background().Err" ranked above "context.Background".
Fix by scoring context.Background in this example as
stdScore+tinyRelevanceScore instead of just tinyRelevanceScore. I also
changed untyped candidate scores in the same way so they stay
competitive when you have both imported and unimported candidates.
The other option was to propagate the score penalty into deep
candidates, but that wasn't easy. In general I think you are better off
avoiding big score penalties because they complicate the interplay
between different kinds of candidates. Scoring needs an overhaul, but
at least we are building up our test suite in the meantime.
Change-Id: Ia5d32c057b04174229686cec6ac0542c30e186e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218378
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
We were recursing infinitely evaluating objects of recursive pointer
types such as "type foo *foo". Now we track named pointer types we
have already seen to avoid trying to dereference such objects forever.
I lazily initialized the "seen" map to avoid the allocation in the
normal case when you aren't dealing with named pointer types.
Fixesgolang/go#37104.
Change-Id: I5f294cfc5a641e7b5fd24e1d9dc55520726ea560
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/218579
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
I'm starting to think that it might make more sense to show all
documentation on hover as a default. A number of people have requested
this behavior, and I think it would help ensure a more consistent
experience for users. We had originally defaulted to the synopsis
because VS Code Go had this behavior, but I see no reason to follow that
as a guideline.
Change-Id: I67aa530d253422550f59b5583e4c4a90ebd48f5b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217727
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
