These changes match the following gofrontend error messages:
blank1.go:16:1: error: may not define methods on non-local type
chan/perm.go:28:9: error: expected channel
chan/perm.go:29:11: error: left operand of ‘<-’ must be channel
chan/perm.go:69:9: error: argument must be channel
complit1.go:25:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:26:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:27:17: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:49:41: error: may only omit types within composite literals of slice, array, or map type
complit1.go:50:14: error: expected struct, slice, array, or map type for composite literal
convlit.go:24:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type string)
convlit.go:25:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type float64)
convlit.go:26:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type int)
ddd1.go:63:9: error: invalid use of ‘...’ calling non-variadic function
fixedbugs/bug176.go:12:18: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/bug332.go:17:10: error: use of undefined type ‘T’
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:22:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:33:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:44:25: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:55:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4458.go:19:14: error: type has no method ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue5172.go:24:14: error: too many expressions for struct
init.go:17:9: error: reference to undefined name ‘runtime’
initializerr.go:26:29: error: duplicate value for index 1
interface/explicit.go:60:14: error: type assertion only valid for interface types
label.go:64:9: error: reference to undefined label ‘go2’
label1.go:18:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:22:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:106:89: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:108:26: error: invalid continue label ‘on’
label1.go:111:118: error: break statement not within for or switch or select
label1.go:113:23: error: invalid break label ‘dance’
map1.go:64:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:65:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:67:9: error: argument 1 must be a map
method2.go:36:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:37:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:41:12: error: method requires pointer (use ‘(*T).g’)
syntax/chan1.go:13:19: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
syntax/chan1.go:17:11: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
Change-Id: I98047b60a376e3d2788836300f7fcac3f2c285cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273527
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Gccgo CL 184998 added optimizations for one- and two-case select
statements. But it didn't handle break statement in the select
case correctly. The fix is CL 185519. This CL adds a test.
Change-Id: Ide1b199f106172b41dd77c1f6e0d662fccdd8cc5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/185520
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Change-Id: Idee94a1d93555d53442098dd7479982e3f5afbba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/161339
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On a slow or distracted machine, 0.1s is sometimes
not long enough for a non-blocking function call to complete.
This causes rare test flakes.
They can be easily reproduced by reducing the wait time to (say) 100ns.
For non-blocking functions, increase the window from 100ms to 10s.
Using different windows for block and non-blocking functions,
allows us to reduce the time for blocking functions.
The risk here is false negatives, but that risk is low;
this test is run repeatedly on many fast machines,
for which 10ms is ample time.
This reduces the time required to run the test by a factor of 10,
from ~1s to ~100ms.
Fixes#20299
Change-Id: Ice9a641a66c6c101d738a2ebe1bcb144ae3c9916
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47812
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
These are functional tests, so it is safe to gofmt them.
Change-Id: I3067279c1d49809ac6a62054448ab8a6c3de9bda
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43623
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change adds line position tests for several yyerror calls in the
typechecker that are currently not tested in any way.
Untested yyerror calls were found by replacing them with
yerrorl(src.NoXPos, ...)
(thus destroying position information in the error), and then running
the test suite. No failures means no test coverage for the relevant
yyerror call.
For #19683
Change-Id: Iedb3d2f02141b332e9bfa76dbf5ae930ad2fddc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41477
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
doubleselect.go defines a flag to control the number of iterations,
but never called flag.Parse so it was unusable.
Change-Id: Ib5d0c7119e7f7c9a808dcc02d0d9cc6ba5bbc16e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41299
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
No functional changes.
Generating shorter functions improves compilation time. On my laptop, this test's running time goes from 5.5s to 1.5s; the wall clock time to run all tests goes down 1s. On Raspberry Pi, this CL cuts 50s off the wall clock time to run all tests.
Fixes#7503.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/72590045
The select2.go test assumed that the memory allocated between
its two samplings of runtime.ReadMemStats is strictly
increasing. To avoid failing the tests when this is not true,
a greater-than check is introduced before computing the
difference in allocated memory.
R=golang-dev, r, cshapiro
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/13701046
Unexports runtime.MemStats and rename MemStatsType to MemStats.
The new accessor requires passing a pointer to a user-allocated
MemStats structure.
Fixes#2572.
R=bradfitz, rsc, bradfitz, gustavo
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/5616072
I converted this program yesterday and the output is the
same as it used to be, ignoring space, but the result is
not the best expression of the algorithm. The old {.section
Maybe} pieces are now {{with .Maybe}}, as a direct translation,
but I they should be {{if .Maybe}} as the output is just a
bool and there is no cascading.
I have verified that the output of the program is unaffected.
R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4889053
It's already in old/template; make that build.
Update a couple of references to point to the old template.
They can be updated later.
Update goplay to use exp/template.
R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4902046
In line with other functions such as Fprintf, put the
thing to be written first.
Apologies for the breakages this is sure to cause.
R=rsc, gri, adg, eds, r2, aam
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4169042
The sanity checking in pass 2 is wrong
when a select is offering to communicate in
either direction on a channel and neither case
is immediately ready.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3991047
Close of closed channel panics.
Receive from closed channel never panics,
even if done repeatedly.
Fixes#1349.
Fixes#1419.
R=gri, iant, ken2, r, gri1, r2, iant2, rog, albert.strasheim, niemeyer, ejsherry
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3989042
There were duplicate closes and missing closes,
with the result that the program was rarely testing
as much as it seemed to be. Now it finishes.
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4008046
nonblock.go wants to test nonblocking operations on
synchronous channels, so it is inherently racy. This
introduces loops to make the race conditions much more likely
to succeed when using gccgo.
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/2161043
* adds pass 3 to dequeue from channels eagerly
various other cleanup/churn:
* use switch on cas->send in each pass to
factor out common code.
* longer goto labels, commented at target
* be more agressive about can't happen:
throw instead of print + cope.
* use "select" instead of "selectgo" in errors
* use printf for debug prints when possible
R=ken2, ken3
CC=golang-dev, r
https://golang.org/cl/875041
