Type constraint satisfaction is interface implementation.
Adjusted a few error messages.
Change-Id: I4266af78e83131a76b1e3e44c847a21de760ac6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/363839
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
In this case, we can't use an itab for doing a bound call, since we're
converting from an interface to an interface. We do a static or dynamic
type assert in new function assertToBound().
The dynamic type assert in assertToBound() is only needed if a bound is
parameterized. In that case, we must do a dynamic type assert, and
therefore need a dictionary entry for the type bound (see change in
getGfInfo). I'm not sure if we can somehow limit this case, since using
an interface as a type arg AND having the type bound of the type
arg be parameterized is a very unlikely case.
Had to add the TUNION case to parameterizedBy1() (which is only used for
extra checking).
Added a bunch of these test cases to 13.go, which now passes.
Change-Id: Ic22eed637fa879b5bbb46d36b40aaad6f90b9d01
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/339898
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL changes fixedbugs/issue30862.go into a "runindir" test so that
it can use '-goexperiment fieldtrack' and test that //go:nointerface
works with cmd/compile. In particular, this revealed that -G=3 and
unified IR did not handle it correctly.
This CL also fixes unified IR's support for //go:nointerface and adds
a test that checks that //go:nointerface, promoted methods, and
generics all interact as expected.
Updates #47045.
Change-Id: Ib8acff8ae18bf124520d00c98e8915699cba2abd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/332611
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Removed a case in transformCall() where we were setting a type on n,
which isn't needed, since noder2 already set the type of n. More
importantly, we are losing information, since the type of the results
may be a shape type, but the actual type of call is the known type
from types2, which may be a concrete type (in this case Zero[MyInt]).
That concrete type will then be used correctly if the concrete result is
converted to an interface.
If we are inlining the call to Zero[MyInt], we need to add an implicit
CONVNOP operation, since we are going to use the result variable
directly, which has a shape type. So, add an implicit CONVNOP to
remember that the known type is the concrete type.
Also cleaned up 14.go a bit, so it is more understandable. Renamed type
T to AnyInt, since T is used elsewhere as a type parameter. Reformatted
Zero function and added a comment.
Change-Id: Id917a2e054e0bbae9bd302232853fa8741d49b64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/336430
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL includes multiple test cases that exercise unique failures
with -G=3 mode that did not affect unified IR mode. Most of these were
found over a period of about 3 hours of manual experimentation.
Thanks to Cuong Manh Le for test cases 11 and 12.
Updates #46704.
Change-Id: Ia2fa619536732b121b6c929329065c85b9384511
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/326169
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
