Change-Id: Ib6e2b858fcb15ea95fa8cfcba3bfac4e210605fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45610
Reviewed-by: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Several of the CLs that were against the runtime are noted in other
places in the release notes, depending on where they are most
user-visible.
Change-Id: I167dc7ff17a4c5f9a5d22d5bd123aa0e99f5639e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45137
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
For non-constant shifts with an untyped constant shift count, the
spec only said that it must "be converted to unsigned integer type".
go/types accepts any (arbitrarily large) integer value. Both cmd/compile
and gccgo require that the shift count be representable as a uint value
in that case (if the shift count is typed, it may be any unsigned integer
type).
This change adjusts the spec to state what the compilers have been doing
all along. The new wording matches similar rules elsewhere (e.g., for
untyped array and slice indices). Also, while technically this is a
restriction (we could permit arbitrarily large shift counts), in practice
this is irrelevant.
Fixes#14822.
Change-Id: Ia75834c67483cf761c10025c8df758f225ef67c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45072
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The new math/bits package has a section for itself, and should not be
mentioned in the 'Minor changes to the library' section of the release
notes.
Updates #20587
Change-Id: I13ecd35f5cee4324e50b2d31800e399c00159126
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45051
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Many TODOs remain.
Updates #20587
Change-Id: If49854ae4d36346d9e072a386f413cc85c66b62a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45012
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This includes the patch for systems that build PIE executables by
defaul
Updates #20276.
Change-Id: Iecf8dfcf11bc18d397b8075559c37e3610f825cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44470
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
It was removed in CL 27325.
Fixes#20431
Change-Id: I6842851444186e19029d040f61fdf4f87a3103a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43771
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
A pointer type of underlying type unsafe.Pointer can be used in
unsafe conversions. Document unfortunate status quo.
Fixes#19306.
Change-Id: I28172508a200561f8df366bbf2c2807ef3b48c97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42132
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
There's no Settings->Agreement path for PolyGerrit users, but if we
link directly to the page in the instructions, Gerrit will inform them
that they can access the page by switching to the old UI.
Fixes#20207
Change-Id: I0887ee854e4ac5975b5f305adb6259b81b41618f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42412
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Adding the Go Time podcast under the `Stay informed` section of the help
page on the website.
Change-Id: Ifb1c6bb20cbf640a91572d47f14a432f58439261
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41146
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Added a paragraph and examples explaining when an implementation
may use fused floating-point operations (such as FMA) and how to
prevent operation fusion.
For #17895.
Change-Id: I64c9559fc1097e597525caca420cfa7032d67014
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40391
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The section on map literals mentions constant map keys but doesn't say
what happens for equal non-constant map keys - that is covered in the
section on evaluation order. Added respective link for clarity.
Fixes#19689.
Change-Id: If9a5368ba02e8250d4bb0a1d60d0de26a1f37bbb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38598
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Updates #17802
Change-Id: I65ea0f4cde973604c04051e7eb25d12e4facecd3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36626
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
POSIX Shell only supports = to compare variables inside '[' tests. But
this is Bash, where == is an alias for =. In practice they're the same,
but the current form is inconsisnent and breaks POSIX for no good
reason.
Change-Id: I38fa7a5a90658dc51acc2acd143049e510424ed8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38031
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The (original) section on "Operators and Delimiters" introduced
superfluous terminology ("delimiter", "special token") which
didn't matter and was used inconsistently.
Removed any mention of "delimiter" or "special token" and now
simply group the special character tokens into "operators"
(clearly defined via links), and "punctuation" (everything else).
Fixes#19450.
Change-Id: Ife31b24b95167ace096f93ed180b7eae41c66808
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38073
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Fixes#19223.
Change-Id: I4cc8e81559a1313e1477ee36902e1b653155a888
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37374
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
This change removes the punitive language and anonymous reporting mechanism
from the Code of Conduct document. Read on for the rationale.
More than a year has passed since the Go Code of Conduct was introduced.
In that time, there have been a small number (<30) of reports to the Working Group.
Some reports we handled well, with positive outcomes for all involved.
A few reports we handled badly, resulting in hurt feelings and a bad
experience for all involved.
On reflection, the reports that had positive outcomes were ones where the
Working Group took the role of advisor/facilitator, listening to complaints and
providing suggestions and advice to the parties involved.
The reports that had negative outcomes were ones where the subject of the
report felt threatened by the Working Group and Code of Conduct.
After some discussion among the Working Group, we saw that we are most
effective as facilitators, rather than disciplinarians. The various Go spaces
already have moderators; this change to the CoC acknowledges their authority
and places the group in a purely advisory role. If an incident is
reported to the group we may provide information to or make a
suggestion the moderators, but the Working Group need not (and should not) have
any authority to take disciplinary action.
In short, we want it to be clear that the Working Group are here to help
resolve conflict, period.
The second change made here is the removal of the anonymous reporting mechanism.
To date, the quality of anonymous reports has been low, and with no way to
reach out to the reporter for more information there is often very little we
can do in response. Removing this one-way reporting mechanism strengthens the
message that the Working Group are here to facilitate a constructive dialogue.
Change-Id: Iee52aff5446accd0dae0c937bb3aa89709ad5fb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37014
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
CL (change list) pops out of nowhere and confuses the
reader. Use "change" instead to be consistent with the
rest of the document.
Fixes#18989.
Change-Id: I525a63a195dc6bb992c8ad0f10c2f2e1b2b952df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36564
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
To avoid confusion caused by the term "named type" (which now just
means a type with a name, but formerly meant a type declared with
a non-alias type declaration), a type declaration now comes in two
forms: alias declarations and type definitions. Both declare a type
name, but type definitions also define new types.
Replace the use of "named type" with "defined type" elsewhere in
the spec.
For #18130.
Change-Id: I49f5ddacefce90354eb65ee5fbf10ba737221995
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36213
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Dave and Jason have moved on to other things.
Change-Id: I702d11bedfab1f47a33679a48c2309f49021229e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36450
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
