mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-23 03:50:03 -07:00
489f508ccf
8 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dan Scales
|
90a8482a17 |
test: re-enable most go/tests that were disabled because of types2 differences
I made the default be that, where there are differences between types2 and -G=0 error messages, we want errorcheck tests to pass types2. Typically, we can get errorcheck to pass on types2 and -G=0 if they give the same number of error messages on the same lines, just different wording. If they give a different number of error messages, then I made types2 pass. I added an exception list for -G=0 to cover those cases where -G=0 and types give different numbers of error messages. Because types2 does not run if there are syntax errors, for several tests, I had to split the tests into two parts in order to get all the indicated errors to be reported in types2 (bug228.go, bug388.go, issue11610.go, issue14520.go) I tried to preserve the GCCGO labeling correctly (but may have gotten some wrong). When types2 now matches where a GCCGO error previously occurred, I transformed GCCGO_ERROR -> ERROR. When types2 no longer reports an error in a certain place, I transformed ERROR -> GCCGO_ERROR. When types2 reports an error in a new place, I used GC_ERROR. The remaining entries in types2Failures are things that I think we probably still need to fix - either actually missing errors in types2, or cases where types2 gives worse errors than -G=0. Change-Id: I7f01e82b322b16094096b67d7ed2bb39b410c34f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/372854 Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> |
||
Ian Lance Taylor
|
6d2b3351f6 |
test: match gofrontend error messages
fixedbugs/bug13343.go:10:12: error: initialization expressions for ‘b’ and ‘c’ depend upon each other fixedbugs/bug13343.go:11:9: note: ‘c’ defined here fixedbugs/bug13343.go:11:9: error: initialization expression for ‘c’ depends upon itself fixedbugs/bug13343.go:11:9: error: initialization expressions for ‘c’ and ‘b’ depend upon each other fixedbugs/bug13343.go:10:12: note: ‘b’ defined here fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:24:10: error: reference to method ‘Do’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:25:10: error: reference to method ‘do’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:27:10: error: reference to method ‘Dont’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:28:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘Dont’ fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:31:10: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘do’ fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:33:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘do’ fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:34:10: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘Dont’ fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:35:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘Dont’ fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:37:10: error: reference to method ‘Do’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:38:10: error: reference to method ‘do’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:40:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘do’ fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:41:10: error: reference to method ‘Dont’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:42:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘Dont’ fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:43:10: error: reference to method ‘secret’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:44:13: error: reference to unexported field or method ‘secret’ fixedbugs/issue10975.go:13:9: error: interface contains embedded non-interface fixedbugs/issue11326.go:26:17: error: floating-point constant overflow fixedbugs/issue11326.go:27:17: error: floating-point constant overflow fixedbugs/issue11326.go:28:17: error: floating-point constant overflow fixedbugs/issue11361.go:9:11: error: import file ‘fmt’ not found fixedbugs/issue11361.go:11:11: error: reference to undefined name ‘fmt’ fixedbugs/issue11371.go:12:15: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue11371.go:13:15: error: integer constant overflow fixedbugs/issue11371.go:17:15: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue11590.go:9:17: error: integer constant overflow fixedbugs/issue11590.go:9:17: error: integer constant overflow fixedbugs/issue11590.go:10:22: error: complex real part overflow fixedbugs/issue11590.go:10:22: error: complex real part overflow fixedbugs/issue11590.go:11:23: error: complex real part overflow fixedbugs/issue11590.go:11:23: error: complex real part overflow fixedbugs/issue11590.go:9:19: error: integer constant overflow fixedbugs/issue11590.go:10:24: error: complex real part overflow fixedbugs/issue11590.go:11:25: error: complex real part overflow fixedbugs/issue11610.go:11:7: error: import path is empty fixedbugs/issue11610.go:12:4: error: invalid character 0x3f in input file fixedbugs/issue11610.go:14:1: error: expected identifier fixedbugs/issue11610.go:14:1: error: expected type fixedbugs/issue11614.go:14:9: error: interface contains embedded non-interface fixedbugs/issue13248.go:13:1: error: expected operand fixedbugs/issue13248.go:13:1: error: missing ‘)’ fixedbugs/issue13248.go:12:5: error: reference to undefined name ‘foo’ fixedbugs/issue13266.go:10:8: error: package name must be an identifier fixedbugs/issue13266.go:10:8: error: expected ‘;’ or newline after package clause fixedbugs/issue13266.go:10:8: error: expected declaration fixedbugs/issue13273.go:50:18: error: expected ‘chan’ fixedbugs/issue13273.go:53:24: error: expected ‘chan’ fixedbugs/issue13274.go:11:58: error: expected ‘}’ fixedbugs/issue13365.go:14:19: error: index expression is negative fixedbugs/issue13365.go:15:21: error: index expression is negative fixedbugs/issue13365.go:16:22: error: index expression is negative fixedbugs/issue13365.go:19:13: error: some element keys in composite literal are out of range fixedbugs/issue13365.go:22:19: error: incompatible type for element 1 in composite literal fixedbugs/issue13365.go:23:21: error: incompatible type for element 1 in composite literal fixedbugs/issue13365.go:24:22: error: incompatible type for element 1 in composite literal fixedbugs/issue13415.go:14:5: error: redefinition of ‘x’ fixedbugs/issue13415.go:14:5: note: previous definition of ‘x’ was here fixedbugs/issue13415.go:14:5: error: ‘x’ declared but not used fixedbugs/issue13471.go:12:25: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:13:25: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:14:25: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:15:24: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:16:23: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:18:26: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:19:26: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:20:26: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:21:25: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:22:24: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13471.go:24:24: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:18:12: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:19:13: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:20:13: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:21:13: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:22:13: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:24:12: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue14006.go:24:18: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline fixedbugs/issue14006.go:30:18: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline fixedbugs/issue14006.go:37:22: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline fixedbugs/issue14006.go:43:22: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline fixedbugs/issue14006.go:59:17: note: previous definition of ‘labelname’ was here fixedbugs/issue14006.go:64:17: error: label ‘labelname’ already defined fixedbugs/issue14006.go:24:17: error: value computed is not used fixedbugs/issue14006.go:30:17: error: value computed is not used fixedbugs/issue14006.go:37:20: error: value computed is not used fixedbugs/issue14006.go:43:20: error: value computed is not used fixedbugs/issue14006.go:59:17: error: label ‘labelname’ defined and not used fixedbugs/issue14010.go:13:14: error: invalid left hand side of assignment fixedbugs/issue14010.go:14:14: error: invalid left hand side of assignment fixedbugs/issue14010.go:14:9: error: invalid use of type fixedbugs/issue14321.go:30:10: error: method ‘F’ is ambiguous in type ‘C’ fixedbugs/issue14321.go:31:10: error: ‘G’ is ambiguous via ‘A’ and ‘B’ fixedbugs/issue14321.go:33:10: error: type ‘C’ has no method ‘I’ fixedbugs/issue8183.go:12:14: error: integer constant overflow fixedbugs/issue9036.go:21:12: error: invalid prefix for floating constant fixedbugs/issue9036.go:22:12: error: invalid prefix for floating constant fixedbugs/issue9076.go:14:5: error: incompatible type in initialization (cannot use type uintptr as type int32) fixedbugs/issue9076.go:15:5: error: incompatible type in initialization (cannot use type uintptr as type int32) For issue9083.go avoid an error about a variable that is set but not used. fixedbugs/issue9370.go:105:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:106:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:107:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:108:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:109:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:110:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:112:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:113:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:114:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:115:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:116:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:117:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:119:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:119:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value fixedbugs/issue9370.go:36:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:39:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:43:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:46:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:50:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:53:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:56:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:57:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:58:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:59:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:60:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:61:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:65:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:68:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:70:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:71:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:72:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:73:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:74:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:75:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:77:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:78:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:79:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:80:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:81:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:82:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:84:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:85:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:86:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:87:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:88:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:89:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:91:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:92:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:93:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:94:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:95:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:96:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:98:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:99:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go💯15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:101:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:102:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil) fixedbugs/issue9370.go:103:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type fixedbugs/issue9370.go:121:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:122:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:123:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression fixedbugs/issue9370.go:124:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression Change-Id: I4089de4919112b08f5f2bbec20f84fcc7dbe3955 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/276832 Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com> |
||
Robert Griesemer
|
4b8895e2dd |
[dev.inline] cmd/compile/internal/syntax: remove gcCompat uses in scanner
- make the scanner unconditionally gc compatible - consistently use "invalid" instead "illegal" in errors Reviewed in and cherry-picked from https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/33896/. Change-Id: I4c4253e7392f3311b0d838bbe503576c9469b203 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34237 Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> |
||
Matthew Dempsky
|
adda7ad295 |
cmd/compile/internal/gc: enable new parser by default
Change-Id: I3c784986755cfbbe1b8eb8da4d64227bd109a3b0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27203 Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> |
||
Matthew Dempsky
|
70544c91ff |
cmd/compile/internal/syntax: match old parser errors and line numbers
This makes a bunch of changes to package syntax to tweak line numbers for AST nodes. For example, short variable declaration statements are now associated with the location of the ":=" token, and function calls are associated with the location of the final ")" token. These help satisfy many unit tests that assume the old parser's behavior. Because many of these changes are questionable, they're guarded behind a new "gcCompat" const to make them easy to identify and revisit in the future. A handful of remaining tests are too difficult to make behave identically. These have been updated to execute with -newparser=0 and comments explaining why they need to be fixed. all.bash now passes with both the old and new parsers. Change-Id: Iab834b71ca8698d39269f261eb5c92a0d55a3bf4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27199 Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> |
||
Robert Griesemer
|
539aa05a64 |
cmd/compile: towards simpler and faster lexing: always use getr
Always reading runes (rather than bytes) has negligible overhead (a simple if at the moment - it can be eliminated eventually) but simplifies the lexer logic and opens up the door for speedups. In the process remove many int conversions that are now not needed anymore. Also, because identifiers are now more easily recognized, remove talph label and move identifier lexing "in place". Also, instead of accepting all chars < 0x80 and then check for "frogs", only permit valid characters in the first place. Removes an extra call for common simple tokens and leads to simpler logic. `time go build -a net/http` (best of 5 runs) seems 1% faster. Assuming this is in the noise, there is no noticeable performance degradation with this change. Change-Id: I3454c9bf8b91808188cf7a5f559341749da9a1eb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19847 Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> |
||
Matthew Dempsky
|
7d3a40978a |
cmd/compile: refactor export data parsing
Merge push_parser and pop_parser into a single parse_import function and inline unimportfile. Shake out function boundaries a little bit so that the symmetry is readily visible. Move the import_package call into parse_import (and inline import_there into import_package). This means importfile no longer needs to provide fake import data to be needlessly lexed/parsed every time it's called. Also, instead of indicating import success/failure by whether the next token is "package", import_spec can just check whether importpkg is non-nil. Tangentially, this somehow alters the diagnostics produced for test/fixedbugs/issue11610.go. However, the new diagnostics are more consistent with those produced when the empty import statement is absent, which seems more desirable than maintaining the previous errors. Change-Id: I5cd1c22aa14da8a743ef569ff084711d137279d5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19650 Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> |
||
Didier Spezia
|
70da2d0a2a |
cmd/compile/internal/gc: fix internal compiler error on invalid declaration
Following an empty import, a declaration involving a ? symbol generates an internal compiler error when the name of the symbol (in newname function). package a import"" var? go.go:2: import path is empty go.go:3: internal compiler error: newname nil Make sure dclname is not called when the symbol is nil. The error message is now: go.go:2: import path is empty go.go:3: invalid declaration go.go:4: syntax error: unexpected EOF This CL was initially meant to be applied to the old parser, and has been updated to apply to the new parser. Fixes #11610 Change-Id: I75e07622fb3af1d104e3a38c89d9e128e3b94522 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15268 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> |