This results in names to unexported fields like
net.(*Dialer)."".deadline instead of net.(*Dialer).deadline.
Fixes#18419.
Change-Id: I0415c68b77cc16125c2401320f56308060ac3f25
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44070
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Arguments to inlined calls are hidden from setPos as follows:
args := as.Rlist
as.Rlist.Set(nil)
// setPos...
as.Rlist.Set(args.Slice())
Previously, this code had no effect since the value of as was
overwritten by the assignment in the retvars loop.
Fixes#19799.
Change-Id: Iaf97259f82fdba8b236136337cc42b2774c7fef5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44351
Run-TryBot: David Lazar <lazard@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Apply the fix in CL 44355 to MIPS.
ARM64 has these rules but commented out for performance reason.
Fix the commented rules, in case they are enabled in the future.
Enhance the test so it triggers the failure on ARM and MIPS without
the fix.
Updates #20530.
Change-Id: I82d77448e3939a545fe519d0a29a164f8fa5417c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44430
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Replacing byteload-of-bytestore-of-x with x is incorrect
when x contains a larger-than-byte value (and so on for
16 and 32-bit load/store pairs). Replace "x" with the
appropriate zero/sign extension of x, which if unnecessary
will be repaired by other rules.
Made logic for arm match x86 and amd64; yields minor extra
optimization, plus I am (much) more confident it's correct,
despite inability to reproduce bug on arm.
Ppc64 lacks this optimization, hence lacks this problem.
See related https://golang.org/cl/37154/Fixes#20530.
Change-Id: I6af9cac2ad43bee99cafdcb04725ce7e55a43323
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44355
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Instead of just printing the value, print the original node to make the
error more human-friendly. Also print the value if its string form is
different than the original node, to make sure it's obvious what value
was duplicated.
This means that "case '@', '@':", which used to print:
duplicate case 64 in switch
Will now print:
duplicate case '@' (value 64) in switch
Factor this logic out into its own function to reuse it in range cases
and any other place where we might want to print a node and its value in
the future.
Also needed to split the errorcheck files because expression switch case
duplicates are now detected earlier, so they stop the compiler before it
gets to generating the AST and detecting the type switch case
duplicates.
Fixes#20112.
Change-Id: I9009b50dec0d0e705e5de9c9ccb08f1dce8a5a99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41852
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
These are functional tests, so it is safe to gofmt them.
Change-Id: I3067279c1d49809ac6a62054448ab8a6c3de9bda
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43623
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Cannot reproduce original problem. Compiler internals
have changed enough such that this appears to work now.
Restore original test (exported interfaces), but also
keep version of the test using non-exported interfaces.
Fixes#15596.
Change-Id: Idb32da80239963242bd5d1609343c80f19773b0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43622
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
When compiling concurrently, we walk all functions before compiling
any of them. Walking functions can cause variables to switch from
being non-addrtaken to addrtaken, e.g. to prepare for a runtime call.
Typechecking propagates addrtaken-ness of closure variables to
their outer variables, so that capturevars can decide whether to
pass the variable's value or a pointer to it.
When all functions are compiled immediately, as long as the containing
function is compiled prior to the closure, this propagation has no effect.
When compilation is deferred, though, in rare cases, this results in
a change in the addrtaken-ness of a variable in the outer function,
which in turn changes the compiler's output.
(This is rare because in a great many cases, a temporary has been
introduced, insulating the outer variable from modification.)
But concurrent compilation must generate identical results.
To fix this, track whether capturevars has run.
If it has, there is no need to update outer variables
when closure variables change.
Capturevars always runs before any functions are walked or compiled.
The remainder of the changes in this CL are to support the test.
In particular, -d=compilelater forces the compiler to walk all
functions before compiling any of them, despite being non-concurrent.
This is useful because -live is fundamentally incompatible with
concurrent compilation, but we want -c=1 to have no behavior changes.
Fixes#20250
Change-Id: I89bcb54268a41e8588af1ac8cc37fbef856a90c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42853
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Tuple ops are weird. They are essentially a pair of ops,
one which consumes a mem and one which generates a mem (the Select1).
The schedule pass didn't handle these quite right.
Fix the scheduler to include both parts of the paired op in
the store chain. That makes sure that loads are correctly ordered
with respect to the first of the pair.
Add a check for the ssacheck builder, that there is only one
live store at a time. I thought we already had such a check, but
apparently not...
Fixes#20335
Change-Id: I59eb3446a329100af38d22820b1ca2190ca46a78
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43294
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The writebarrier test has to change.
Now that T23 composite literals are passed to the backend,
they get SSA'd, so writes to their fields are treated separately,
so the relevant part of the first write to t23 is now a dead store.
Preserve the intent of the test by splitting it up into two functions.
Reduces code size a bit:
name old object-bytes new object-bytes delta
Template 386k ± 0% 386k ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Unicode 202k ± 0% 202k ± 0% ~ (all equal)
GoTypes 1.16M ± 0% 1.16M ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Compiler 3.92M ± 0% 3.91M ± 0% -0.19% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
SSA 7.91M ± 0% 7.91M ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Flate 228k ± 0% 228k ± 0% -0.05% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
GoParser 283k ± 0% 283k ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Reflect 952k ± 0% 952k ± 0% -0.06% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Tar 188k ± 0% 188k ± 0% -0.09% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
XML 406k ± 0% 406k ± 0% -0.02% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
[Geo mean] 649k 648k -0.04%
Fixes#18872
Change-Id: Ifeed0f71f13849732999aa731cc2bf40c0f0e32a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43154
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reuse block head or preceding instruction's line number for
register allocator's spill, fill, copy, rematerialization
instructionsl; and also for phi, and for no-src-pos
instructions. Assembler creates same line number tables
for copy-predecessor-line and for no-src-pos,
but copy-predecessor produces better-looking assembly
language output with -S and with GOSSAFUNC, and does not
require changes to tests of existing assembly language.
Split "copyInto" into two cases, one for register allocation,
one for otherwise. This caused the test score line change
count to increase by one, which may reflect legitimately
useful information preserved. Without any special treatment
for copyInto, the change count increases by 21 more, from
51 to 72 (i.e., quite a lot).
There is a test; using two naive "scores" for line number
churn, the old numbering is 2x or 4x worse.
Fixes#18902.
Change-Id: I0a0a69659d30ee4e5d10116a0dd2b8c5df8457b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36207
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
If there were more unused imports than
the maximum default number of errors to report,
the set of reported imports was non-deterministic.
Fix by accumulating and sorting them prior to output.
Fixes#20298
Change-Id: Ib3d5a15fd7dc40009523fcdc1b93ddc62a1b05f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42954
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
If we've already complained about a type T,
don't complain again about further expressions
involving it.
Fixes#20245 and hopefully all of its ilk.
Change-Id: Ic0abe8235d52e8a7ac40e3615aea8f3a54fd7cec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42690
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Compile:
package p
var f = func(...A)
Before this CL:
x.go:3:13: type %!v(PANIC=runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference) is not an expression
x.go:3:17: undefined: A
After this CL:
x.go:3:13: type func(...<T>) is not an expression
x.go:3:17: undefined: A
Found with go-fuzz.
Fixes#20233
Change-Id: Ibb232b3954c4091071440eba48b44c4022a8083f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42610
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Because the hint parameter is supposed to be treated
purely as a hint, if it doesn't meet the requirements
we disregard it and continue as if there was no hint
at all.
Fixes#19926
Change-Id: I86e7f99472fad6b99ba4e2fd33e4a9e55d55115e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40854
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Without this, T can sneak through to the backend
with its width unknown.
Fixes#20174
Change-Id: I9b21e0e2641f75e360cc5e45dcb4eefe8255b675
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42175
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Updates #18089.
Test for that issue; it was inadvertently fixed
by CL 34988. Ensure that we don't regress on the fix.
Change-Id: Icb85fc20dbb0a47f028f088281319b552b16759d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42173
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The code in #20162 contains an embedded interface.
It didn't get dowidth'd by the frontend,
and during DWARF generation, ngotype asked
for a string description of it,
which triggered a request for the number of fields
in the interface, which triggered a dowidth,
which is disallowed in the backend.
The other changes in this CL are to support the test.
Fixes#20162
Change-Id: I4d0be5bd949c361d4cdc89a8ed28b10977e40cf9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42131
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
dowidth is fundamentally unsafe to call from the back end;
it will cause data races.
Replace all calls to dowidth in the backend with
assertions that the width has been calculated.
Then fix all the cases in which that was not so,
including the cases from #20145.
Fixes#20145.
Change-Id: Idba3d19d75638851a30ec2ebcdb703c19da3e92b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41970
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When a constant doesn't fit in a single instruction, use two
paired instructions instead of the constant pool. For example
ADD $0xaa00bb, R0, R1
Used to rewrite to:
MOV ?(IP), R11
ADD R11, R0, R1
Instead, do:
ADD $0xaa0000, R0, R1
ADD $0xbb, R1, R1
Same number of instructions.
Good:
4 less bytes (no constant pool entry)
One less load.
Bad:
Critical path is one instruction longer.
It's probably worth it to avoid the loads, they are expensive.
Dave Cheney got us some performance numbers: https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20170426.1
TL;DR mean 1.37% improvement.
Change-Id: Ib206836161fdc94a3962db6f9caa635c87d57cf1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41612
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This change adds line position tests for several yyerror calls in the
typechecker that are currently not tested in any way.
Untested yyerror calls were found by replacing them with
yerrorl(src.NoXPos, ...)
(thus destroying position information in the error), and then running
the test suite. No failures means no test coverage for the relevant
yyerror call.
For #19683
Change-Id: Iedb3d2f02141b332e9bfa76dbf5ae930ad2fddc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41477
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
doubleselect.go defines a flag to control the number of iterations,
but never called flag.Parse so it was unusable.
Change-Id: Ib5d0c7119e7f7c9a808dcc02d0d9cc6ba5bbc16e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41299
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
At VARKILLs, zero a variable if it is ambiguously live.
After the VARKILL anything this variable references
might be collected. If it were to become live again later,
the GC will see references to already-collected objects.
We don't know a variable is ambiguously live until very
late in compilation (after lowering, register allocation, ...),
so it is hard to generate the code in an arch-independent way.
We also have to be careful not to clobber any registers.
Fortunately, this almost never happens so performance is ~irrelevant.
There are only 2 instances where this triggers in the stdlib.
Fixes#20029
Change-Id: Ia9585a91d7b823fad4a9d141d954464cc7af31f4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41076
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Follow-up on https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/39998/
which dropped this information.
The reported blocks are the innermost blocks containing a
label jumped to from outside, not the outermost block as
reported originally by cmd/compile.
We could report the outermost block with a slighly more
involved algorithm (need to track containing blocks for
all unresolved forward gotos), but since gccgo also reports
the innermost blocks, the current approach seems good enough.
Change-Id: Ic0235b8fafe8d5f99dc9872b58e90e8d9e72c5db
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40980
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marvin Stenger <marvin.stenger94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Instead of a separate check control flow pass (checkcfg.go)
operating on nodes, perform this check at parse time on the
new syntax tree. Permits this check to be done concurrently,
and doesn't depend on the specifics of the symbol's dclstack
implementation anymore. The remaining dclstack uses will be
removed in a follow-up change.
- added CheckBranches Mode flag (so we can turn off the check
if we only care about syntactic correctness, e.g. for tests)
- adjusted test/goto.go error messages: the new branches
checker only reports if a goto jumps into a block, but not
which block (we may want to improve this again, eventually)
- also, the new branches checker reports one variable that
is being jumped over by a goto, but it may not be the first
one declared (this is fine either way)
- the new branches checker reports additional errors for
fixedbugs/issue14006.go (not crucial to avoid those errors)
- the new branches checker now correctly reports only
variable declarations being jumped over, rather than
all declarations (issue 8042). Added respective tests.
Fixes#8042.
Change-Id: I53b6e1bda189748e1e1fb5b765a8a64337c27d40
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39998
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Now only cmd/asm and cmd/compile depend on cmd/internal/obj. Changing
the assembler backends no longer requires reinstalling cmd/link or
cmd/addr2line.
There's also now one canonical definition of the object file format in
cmd/internal/objabi/doc.go, with a warning to update all three
implementations.
objabi is still something of a grab bag of unrelated code (e.g., flag
and environment variable handling probably belong in a separate "tool"
package), but this is still progress.
Fixes#15165.
Fixes#20026.
Change-Id: Ic4b92fac7d0d35438e0d20c9579aad4085c5534c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40972
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This rewrites runtime.Caller in terms of stackExpander, which already
handles inlined frames and partially skipped frames. This also has the
effect of making runtime.Caller understand cgo frames if there is a cgo
symbolizer.
Updates #19348.
Change-Id: Icdf4df921aab5aa394d4d92e3becc4dd169c9a6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40270
Run-TryBot: David Lazar <lazard@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The fixedbugs/issue12536.go file was erroneously deleted just before
committing the patch that fixed the issue (CL 14400).
That's an easy test and there's a small reproducer in the issue, add
it back.
Updates #12536
Change-Id: Ib7b0cd245588299e9a5469e1d75805fd0261ce1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40712
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Also adjust truncfltlit to make it more similar to trunccmplxlit, and
make it report an error for bad Etypes.
Fixes#19947
Change-Id: I6684523e989c2293b8a8e85bd2bfb9c399c5ea36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40453
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
When casting an ideal to complex{64,128}, for example during the
evaluation of
var a = complex64(0) / 1e-50
we want the compiler to report a division-by-zero error if a divisor
would be zero after the cast.
We already do this for floats; for example
var b = float32(0) / 1e-50
generates a 'division by zero' error at compile time (because
float32(1e-50) is zero, and the cast is done before performing the
division).
There's no such check in the path for complex{64,128} expressions, and
no cast is performed before the division in the evaluation of
var a = complex64(0) / 1e-50
which compiles just fine.
This patch changes the convlit1 function so that complex ideals
components (real and imag) are correctly truncated to float{32,64}
when doing an ideal -> complex{64, 128} cast.
Fixes#11674
Change-Id: Ic5f8ee3c8cfe4c3bb0621481792c96511723d151
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37891
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Continues outside of a loop are not allowed. Most of these possibilities
were tested in label1.go, but one was missing - a plain continue in a
switch/select but no enclosing loop.
This used to error with a "continue not in loop" in 1.8, but recently
was broken by c03e75e5. In particular, innerloop does not only account
for loops, but also for switches and selects. Swap it by bools that
track whether breaks and continues should be allowed.
While at it, improve the wording of errors for breaks that are not where
they should be. Change "loop" by "loop, switch, or select" since they
can be used in any of those.
And add tests to make sure this isn't broken again. Use a separate func
since I couldn't get the compiler to crash on f() itself, possibly due
to the recursive call on itself.
Fixes#19934.
Change-Id: I8f09c6c2107fd95cac50efc2a8cb03cbc128c35e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40357
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
