The assignment `sink, *(&ok) = y.(int)` should (and does) escape a
value to the heap, but this detail is missed because the implicit
conversion of the multi-value expression `y.(int)` isn't visible to
escape analysis (because it's not inserted until desugaring during
walk).
For Unified IR, I plan to apply this desugaring earlier (because it's
necessary for correct dictionary handling), which means we'll
now (correctly) report the heap escape.
Due to limitations of the $GOROOT/test harness, the easiest way to
handle that GOEXPERIMENT=unified gets this right while
GOEXPERIMENT=nounified does not is to split the test case into
separate files. Hence this CL.
Change-Id: I91f3a6c015cbc646ab018747e152cac2874cf24c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/415241
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
A method selector expression can pick out a method or promoted method
(represented by ODOTMETH), but it can also pick out an interface
method from an embedded interface-typed field (represented by
ODOTINTER).
In the case that we're picking out an interface method, we're not able
to fully devirtualize the method call. However, we're still able to
improve escape analysis somewhat. E.g., the included test case
demonstrates that we can optimize "i.M()" to "i.(T).I.M()", which
means the T literal can be stack allocated instead of heap allocated.
Fixes#42279.
Change-Id: Ifa21d19011e2f008d84f9624b7055b4676b6d188
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266300
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
After inlining, add a pass that looks for interface calls where we can
statically determine the interface value's concrete type. If such a
case is found, insert an explicit type assertion to the concrete type
so that escape analysis can see it.
Fixes#33160.
Change-Id: I36932c691693f0069e34384086d63133e249b06b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/264837
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
This CL changes "T literal.M" error message to "T{...}.M". It's clearer
expression and focusing user on actual issue.
Updates #38745
Change-Id: I84b455a86742f37e0bde5bf390aa02984eecc3c9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/253677
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Currently, when we create an OPTRLIT node, it defaults to the
OCOMPLIT's final element's position. But it improves error messages to
use the OCOMPLIT's own position instead.
Change-Id: Ibb031f543c7248d88d99fd0737685e01d86e2500
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197119
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This information is redundant with the position information already
provided. Also, no other -m diagnostics print out function name.
While here, report parameter leak diagnostics against the parameter
declaration position rather than the function, and use Warnl for
"moved to heap" messages.
Test cases updated programmatically by removing the first word from
every "no match for" error emitted by run.go:
go run run.go |& \
sed -E -n 's/^(.*):(.*): no match for `([^ ]* (.*))` in:$/\1!\2!\3!\4/p' | \
while IFS='!' read -r fn line before after; do
before=$(echo "$before" | sed 's/[.[\*^$()+?{|]/\\&/g')
after=$(echo "$after" | sed -E 's/(\&|\\)/\\&/g')
fn=$(find . -name "${fn}" | head -1)
sed -i -E -e "${line}s/\"${before}\"/\"${after}\"/" "${fn}"
done
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I6e02486b1409e4a8dbb2b9b816d22095835426b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195040
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
In general, a conversion to interface type may require values to be
boxed, which in turn necessitates escape analysis to determine whether
the boxed representation can be stack allocated.
However, esc.go used to unconditionally print escape analysis
decisions about OCONVIFACE, even for conversions that don't require
boxing (e.g., pointers, channels, maps, functions).
For test compatibility with esc.go, escape.go similarly printed these
useless diagnostics. This CL removes the diagnostics, and updates test
expectations accordingly.
Change-Id: I97c57a4a08e44d265bba516c78426ff4f2bf1e12
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192697
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Prep for subsequent CLs to remove old escape analysis pass.
This CL removes -newescape=true from tests that use it, and deletes
tests that use -newescape=false. (For history, see CL 170447.)
Notably, this removes escape_because.go without any replacement, but
this is being tracked by #31489.
Change-Id: I6f6058d58fff2c5d210cb1d2713200cc9f501ca7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/187617
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The new escape analysis implementation tries to emit debugging
diagnostics that are compatible with the existing implementation, but
there's a handful of cases that are easier to handle by updating the
test expectations instead.
For regress tests that need updating, the original file is copied to
oldescapeXXX.go.go with -newescape=false added to the //errorcheck
line, while the file is updated in place with -newescape=true and new
test requirements.
Notable test changes:
1) escape_because.go looks for a lot of detailed internal debugging
messages that are fairly particular to how esc.go works and that I
haven't attempted to port over to escape.go yet.
2) There are a lot of "leaking param: x to result ~r1 level=-1"
messages for code like
func(p *int) *T { return &T{p} }
that were simply wrong. Here &T must be heap allocated unconditionally
(because it's being returned); and since p is stored into it, p
escapes unconditionally too. esc.go incorrectly reports that p escapes
conditionally only if the returned pointer escaped.
3) esc.go used to print each "leaking param" analysis result as it
discovered them, which could lead to redundant messages (e.g., that a
param leaks at level=0 and level=1). escape.go instead prints
everything at the end, once it knows the shortest path to each sink.
4) esc.go didn't precisely model direct-interface types, resulting in
some values unnecessarily escaping to the heap when stored into
non-escaping interface values.
5) For functions written in assembly, esc.go only printed "does not
escape" messages, whereas escape.go prints "does not escape" or
"leaking param" as appropriate, consistent with the behavior for
functions written in Go.
6) 12 tests included "BAD" annotations identifying cases where esc.go
was unnecessarily heap allocating something. These are all fixed by
escape.go.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: Iabc9eb14c94c9cadde3b183478d1fd54f013502f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170447
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For most nodes (e.g., OPTRLIT, OMAKESLICE, OCONVIFACE), escape
analysis prints "escapes to heap" or "does not escape" to indicate
whether that node's allocation can be heap or stack allocated.
These messages are also emitted for OADDR, even though OADDR does not
actually allocate anything itself. Moreover, it's redundant because
escape analysis already prints "moved to heap" diagnostics when an
OADDR node like "&x" causes x to require heap allocation.
Because OADDR nodes don't allocate memory, my escape analysis rewrite
doesn't naturally emit the "escapes to heap" / "does not escape"
diagnostics for them. It's also non-trivial to replicate the exact
semantics esc.go uses for OADDR.
Since there are so many of these messages, I'm disabling them in this
CL by themselves. I modified esc.go to suppress the Warnl calls
without any other behavior changes, and then used a shell script to
automatically remove any ERROR messages mentioned by run.go in
"missing error" or "no match for" lines.
Fixes#16300.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: I3993e2743c3ff83ccd0893f4e73b366ff8871a57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170319
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
This is a followup to issue #13805. That change avoid leaks for types that
don't have any pointers for the single assignment form of a dottype expression.
This does the same for the double assignment form.
Fixes#15796
Change-Id: I27474cade0ff1f3025cb6392f47b87b33542bc0f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24906
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
ODOTTYPE should be treated a whole lot like ODOT,
but it was missing completely from the switch in
escwalk and thus escape status did not propagate
to fields.
Since interfaces are required to trigger this bug,
the test was added to escape_iface.go.
Fixes#11931.
Change-Id: Id0383981cc4b1a160f6ad447192a112eed084538
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12921
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The false positives (var incorrectly escapes) are marked with BAD.
Change-Id: If64fabb6ea96de44a1177d9ab12e2ccc579fe0c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5294
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
