In the previous implementation, the initial verification in lsp/command
for whether extract function was relavant to the given range did not
contain much of the initial logic for extract function. This meant
that "canExtractFunction" produced many false positives (i.e. the
lightbulb would appear when it should not have in VSCode). This CL
moves more of the verification process from "extractFunction"
(lsp/source) to "canExtractFunction" (lsp/command).
Change-Id: If2683dc9ac3f4bfa8c3444418cf88edd8cbe73e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245398
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We'd like to call canExtractVariable in extractVariable without
duplicating logic. The same needs to be done for canExtractFunction.
Change-Id: Ia99befabbafffcf13dd3bc12355f9ddb81a71002
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245135
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Previously, users could not extract code that contained a return
statement. Now, users can extract code with return statements, as long
as the statements are nested within an if, case, or other control
flow statement.
Updates golang/go#37170
Change-Id: I2df52d0241517472decabce3666a32392ff257bd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/243650
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The logic for extracting a function is quite signficant, and the code
is expensive enough that we should only call it when requested by the
user. This means that we should support extracting through a command
rather than text edits in the code action.
To that end, we create a new struct for commands. Features like extract
variable and extract function can supply functions to determine if they
are relevant to the given range, and if so, to generate their text
edits. source.Analyzers now point to Commands, rather than
SuggestedFixFuncs. The "canExtractVariable" and "canExtractFunction"
functions still need improvements, but I think that can be done in a
follow-up.
Change-Id: I9ec894c5abdbb28505a0f84ad7c76aa50977827a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244598
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Extract function is a code action, similar to extract variable. After
highlighting a selection, if valid, the lightbulb appears to trigger
extraction. The current implementation does not allow users to
extract selections with a return statement.
Updates golang/go#37170
Change-Id: I5fc3b19cf7dbca4407ecf0cc37017661223614d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/241957
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
I add a code action that triggers upon request of the user. A variable
name is generated manually for the extracted code because the LSP does
not support a user's ability to provide a name.
Change-Id: Id1ec19b49562b7cfbc2cd416378bec9bd021d82f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/240182
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
