Just a first basic test, I'll extend this to test more but want to get an
opinion on basic approach first.
Change-Id: Idab9ebd7d9960b000b81a01a1e53258bf4bce755
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9386
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This doesn't test much with gccgo, but at least it builds now, and the
test does, unsurprisingly, pass. A proper test would require adding
assembly files in GCC syntax for all platforms that gccgo supports,
which would be infeasible.
Also added copyright headers to the asm files.
Change-Id: Icea5af29d7d521a0681506ddb617a79705b76d33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9417
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Instead of comparing against the entire output that may include
verbose warning messages, use the last line of the output and check
it includes the expected success message (PASS).
Change-Id: Iafd583ee5529a8aef5439b9f1f6ce0185e4b1331
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9304
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
- main3.c tests main.main is exported when compiled for GOOS=android.
- wait longer for main2.c (it's slow on android/arm)
- rearranged test.bash
Fixes#10070.
Change-Id: I6e5a98d1c5fae776afa54ecb5da633b59b269316
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9296
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Forward signals to signal handlers installed before Go installs its own,
under certain circumstances. In particular, as iant@ suggests, signals are
forwarded iff:
(1) a non-SIG_DFL signal handler existed before Go, and
(2) signal is synchronous (i.e., one of SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGFPE), and
(3a) signal occured on a non-Go thread, or
(3b) signal occurred on a Go thread but in CGo code.
Supported only on Linux, for now.
Change-Id: I403219ee47b26cf65da819fb86cf1ec04d3e25f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8712
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The purpose of this test is to make sure that -buildmode=c-shared
works even when the shared library can be built without invoking cgo.
Change-Id: Id6f95af755992b209aff770440ca9819b74113ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9166
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Change-Id: I0d3f9841500e0a41f1c427244869bf3736a31e18
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9075
Reviewed-by: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Followed the same test pattern in misc/cgo/testcarchive.
Change-Id: I2f863b5c24a28f0b38b0128ed3e8a92c17fb5b9f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8985
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This memory is untyped and can't be used anymore.
The next version of SWIG won't need it.
Change-Id: I592b287c5f5186975ee09a9b28d8efe3b57134e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8956
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Because there is no libgcc.
Change-Id: I3b3f80791a1db4c2b7318f81a115972cd2237f07
Signed-off-by: Shenghou Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8786
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
With the new buildmodes c-archive and c-shared, it is possible for a
cgo call to come in early in the lifecycle of a Go program. Calls
before the runtime has been initialized are caught by
_cgo_wait_runtime_init_done. However a call can come in after the
runtime has initialized, but before the program's package init
functions have finished running.
To avoid this cgocallback checks m.ncgo to see if we are on a thread
running Go. If not, we may be a foreign thread and it blocks until
main_init is complete.
Change-Id: I7a9f137fa2a40c322a0b93764261f9aa17fcf5b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8897
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
This reverts commit 9fa9f966e9.
The change has broken darwin and netbsd builders. It needs to be tested properly.
Change-Id: Id9e2d30caa8764c362c9f33890015dfc1aae0dab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8527
Run-TryBot: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
This will enable test sharding over multiple VMs, to speed trybot answers.
Update #10029
Change-Id: Ie277c6459bc38005e4d6af14d22effeaa0a4667e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6531
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Only documentation / comment changes. Update references to
point to golang.org permalinks or go.googlesource.com/go.
References in historical release notes under doc are left as is.
Change-Id: Icfc14e4998723e2c2d48f9877a91c5abef6794ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4060
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
On Darwin/ARM, because libSystem doesn't provide functions for
__sync_fetch_and_add, and only clang can inline that function,
skip the test when building with GCC.
Change-Id: Id5e9d8f9bbe1e6bcb2f381f0f66cf68aa95277c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2125
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This test requires external linking, but we don't yet implement
external linking on ppc64 (tracked in issue #8912). Disable the test
on ppc64 until external linking is implemented.
This makes all.bash pass on ppc64le.
Change-Id: I741498d4d9321607e7a65792a33faf8187bd18e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2908
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
While we're here, rename TestIssue7234 to Test7234 for consistency
with other tests.
Fixes#9557.
Change-Id: I22b0a212b31e7b4f199f6a70deb73374beb80f84
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2654
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Now that there's no 6c compiler anymore, there's no need for cgo to
generate C headers that are compatible with it.
Fixes#9528
Change-Id: I43f53869719eb9a6065f1b39f66f060e604cbee0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2482
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This test is doing pointer graph manipulation from C, and we
cannot support that with concurrent GC. The wbshadow mode
correctly diagnoses missing write barriers.
Disable the test in that mode for now. There is a bigger issue
behind it, namely SWIG, but for now we are focused on making
all.bash pass with wbshadow enabled.
Change-Id: I55891596d4c763e39b74082191d4a5fac7161642
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2346
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Use typedmemmove, typedslicecopy, and adjust reflect.call
to execute the necessary write barriers.
Found with GODEBUG=wbshadow=2 mode.
Eventually that will run automatically, but right now
it still detects other missing write barriers.
Change-Id: Iec5b5b0c1be5589295e28e5228e37f1a92e07742
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2312
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For Go 1.5, we can use go:linkname rather than assembly thunk for gc.
Gccgo already has support for //extern.
Change-Id: I5505aa247dd5b555112f7261ed2f192c81cf0bdf
Signed-off-by: Shenghou Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1888
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
issue9400_linux.go did not build on 386 because it used a constant
that was larger than a 32-bit int in a ... argument. Fix this by
casting the constant to uint64 (to match how the constant is being
used).
Change-Id: Ie8cb64c3910382a41c7852be7734a62f0b2d5a21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2060
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
These signals are used by glibc to broadcast setuid/setgid to all
threads and to send pthread cancellations. Unlike other signals, the
Go runtime does not intercept these because they must invoke the libc
handlers (see issues #3871 and #6997). However, because 1) these
signals may be issued asynchronously by a thread running C code to
another thread running Go code and 2) glibc does not set SA_ONSTACK
for its handlers, glibc's signal handler may be run on a Go stack.
Signal frames range from 1.5K on amd64 to many kilobytes on ppc64, so
this may overflow the Go stack and corrupt heap (or other stack) data.
Fix this by ensuring that these signal handlers have the SA_ONSTACK
flag (but not otherwise taking over the handler).
This has been a problem since Go 1.1, but it's likely that people
haven't encountered it because it only affects setuid/setgid and
pthread_cancel.
Fixes#9600.
Change-Id: I6cf5f5c2d3aa48998d632f61f1ddc2778dcfd300
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1887
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Gccgo can only get a backtrace for the currently running thread, which
means that it can only get a backtrace for goroutines currently running
Go code. When a goroutine is running C code, gccgo has no way to stop
it and get the backtrace. This test is all about getting a backtrace
of goroutines running C code, so it can't work for gccgo.
Change-Id: I2dff4403841fb544da7396562ab1193875fc14c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1904
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
(The assertion depends on a per-package gensym counter whose
value varies based on what else is in the package.)
LGTM=khr
R=khr, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/169930043
On heavily loaded build servers, a 5 second timeout is too aggressive,
which causes this test to fail spuriously.
LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews, sqweek
https://golang.org/cl/170850043
Our current pe object reader assumes that every symbol starting with
'.' is section. It appeared to be true, until now gcc 4.9.1 generates
some symbols with '.' at the front. Change that logic to check other
symbol fields in addition to checking for '.'. I am not an expert
here, but it seems reasonable to me.
Added test, but it is only good, if tested with gcc 4.9.1. Otherwise
the test PASSes regardless.
Fixes#8811.
Fixes#8856.
LGTM=jfrederich, iant, stephen.gutekanst
R=golang-codereviews, jfrederich, stephen.gutekanst, iant
CC=alex.brainman, golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/152410043
The test doesn't work with GOTRACEBACK != 2.
Diagnose that failure mode.
LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=golang-codereviews, r
https://golang.org/cl/152970043
+ static test
NB: there's a preexisting (dynamic) failure of test issue7978.go.
LGTM=iant
R=rsc, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144650045
During a cgo call, the stack can be copied. This copy invalidates
the pointer that cgo has into the return value area. To fix this
problem, pass the address of the location containing the stack
top value (which is in the G struct). For cgo functions which
return values, read the stktop before and after the cgo call to
compute the adjustment necessary to write the return value.
Fixes#8771
LGTM=iant, rsc
R=iant, rsc, khr
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144130043
Those C files would have been compiled with 6c.
It's close to impossible to use C correctly anymore,
and the C compilers are going away eventually.
Make them unavailable now.
go1.4.txt change in CL 145890046
LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews, r
https://golang.org/cl/149720043
Normally, the caller to runtime.entersyscall() must not return before
calling runtime.exitsyscall(), lest g->syscallsp become a dangling
pointer. runtime.cgocallbackg() violates this constraint. To work around
this, save g->syscallsp and g->syscallpc around cgo->Go callbacks, then
restore them after calling runtime.entersyscall(), which restores the
syscall stack frame pointer saved by cgocall. This allows the GC to
correctly trace a goroutine that is currently returning from a
Go->cgo->Go chain.
This also adds a check to proc.c that panics if g->syscallsp is clearly
invalid. It is not 100% foolproof, as it will not catch a case where the
stack was popped then pushed back beyond g->syscallsp, but it does catch
the present cgo issue and makes existing tests fail without the bugfix.
Fixes#7978.
LGTM=dvyukov, rsc
R=golang-codereviews, dvyukov, minux, bradfitz, iant, gobot, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/131910043
Now it's two allocations. I don't see much downside to that,
since the two pieces were in different cache lines anyway.
Rename 'conservative' to 'cgo_conservative_type' and make
clear that _cgo_allocate is the only allowed user.
This depends on CL 141490043, which removes the other
use of conservative (in defer).
LGTM=dvyukov, iant
R=khr, dvyukov, iant
CC=golang-codereviews, rlh
https://golang.org/cl/139610043
testSchedLocal* tests need to malloc now because their
stack frames are too big to fit on the G0 stack.
LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant, khr
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/133660043
newstackcall creates a new stack segment, and we want to
be able to throw away all that code.
LGTM=khr
R=khr, iant
CC=dvyukov, golang-codereviews, r
https://golang.org/cl/139270043
