Embed all data necessary for read/write operations directly into netFD.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkTCP4Persistent 27669 23341 -15.64%
BenchmarkTCP4Persistent-2 18173 12558 -30.90%
BenchmarkTCP4Persistent-4 10390 7319 -29.56%
This change will intentionally break all builders to see
how many allocations they do per read/write.
This will be fixed soon afterwards.
R=golang-dev, alex.brainman
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12413043
gcpc/gcsp are used by GC in similar situation.
gcpc/gcsp are also more stable than gp->sched,
because gp->sched is mutated by entersyscall/exitsyscall
in morestack and mcall. So it has higher chances of being inconsistent.
Also, rename gcpc/gcsp to syscallpc/syscallsp.
This is the same as reverted change 12250043
with save marked as textflag 7.
The problem was that if save calls morestack,
then subsequent lessstack spoils g->sched.pc/sp.
And that bad values were remembered in g->syscallpc/sp.
Entersyscallblock had the same problem,
but it was never triggered to date.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12478043
Basically a partial rollback of 12053043 until I can
figure out what is really going on.
Fixes bug 6051.
R=golang-dev
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12496043
This means that pprof will no longer report profiles on OS X.
That's unfortunate, but the profiles were often wrong and, worse,
it was difficult to tell whether the profile was wrong or not.
The workarounds were making the scheduler more complex,
possibly caused a deadlock (see issue 5519), and did not actually
deliver reliable results.
It may be possible for adventurous users to apply a patch to
their kernels to get working results, or perhaps having no results
will encourage someone to do the work of creating a profiling
thread like on Windows. Issue 6047 has details.
Fixes#5519.
Fixes#6047.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12429045
This means that in the common case (modern kernel), we only
make 1 system call to dup instead of two, and we also avoid
grabbing the syscall.ForkLock.
R=golang-dev, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12476043
you do reflect.call with too big an argument list.
Not worth the hassle.
Fixes#6023Fixes#6033
R=golang-dev, bradfitz, dave
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12485043
While we're here, add a test for the same functionality in gzip,
which was already implemented, and add bzip2 CRC checks.
Fixes#5772.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12387044
Break all 386 builders.
««« original CL description
runtime: use gcpc/gcsp during traceback of goroutines in syscalls
gcpc/gcsp are used by GC in similar situation.
gcpc/gcsp are also more stable than gp->sched,
because gp->sched is mutated by entersyscall/exitsyscall
in morestack and mcall. So it has higher chances of being inconsistent.
Also, rename gcpc/gcsp to syscallpc/syscallsp.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12250043
»»»
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12424045
It was needed for the old scheduler,
because there temporary could be more threads than gomaxprocs.
In the new scheduler gomaxprocs is always respected.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12438043
gcpc/gcsp are used by GC in similar situation.
gcpc/gcsp are also more stable than gp->sched,
because gp->sched is mutated by entersyscall/exitsyscall
in morestack and mcall. So it has higher chances of being inconsistent.
Also, rename gcpc/gcsp to syscallpc/syscallsp.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12250043
In the event that code tries to use a hash function that isn't compiled
in and panics, give the developer a fighting chance of figuring out
which hash function it needed.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12420045
Runtime netpoll supports at most one read waiter
and at most one write waiter. It's responsibility
of net package to ensure that. Currently windows
implementation allows more than one waiter in Accept.
It leads to "fatal error: netpollblock: double wait".
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12400045
Whether the keys are concatenated or separate (or a mixture) depends on the server.
Fixes#5979.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12433043
Windows dynamic priority boosting assumes that a process has different types
of dedicated threads -- GUI, IO, computational, etc. Go processes use
equivalent threads that all do a mix of GUI, IO, computations, etc.
In such context dynamic priority boosting does nothing but harm, so turn it off.
In particular, if 2 goroutines do heavy IO on a server uniprocessor machine,
windows rejects to schedule timer thread for 2+ seconds when priority boosting is enabled.
Fixes#5971.
R=alex.brainman
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12406043
The test isn't checking deliberate panics so catching them just makes the code longer.
R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12420043
This CL makes IPAddr, UDPAddr and TCPAddr implement sockaddr
interface, UnixAddr is already sockaddr interface compliant, and
reduces unnecessary conversions between net.Addr, net.sockaddr and
syscall.Sockaddr.
This is in preparation for runtime-integrated network pollster for BSD
variants.
Update #5199
R=golang-dev, dave, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12010043
It's okay to preempt at ordinary function calls because
compilers arrange that there are no live registers to save
on entry to the function call.
The software floating point routines are function calls
masquerading as individual machine instructions. They are
expected to keep all the registers intact. In particular,
they are expected not to clobber all the floating point
registers.
The floating point registers are kept per-M, because they
are not live at non-preemptive goroutine scheduling events,
and so keeping them per-M reduces the number of 132-byte
register blocks we are keeping in memory.
Because they are per-M, allowing the goroutine to be
rescheduled during software floating point simulation
would mean some other goroutine could overwrite the registers
or perhaps the goroutine would continue running on a different
M entirely.
Disallow preemption during the software floating point
routines to make sure that a function full of floating point
instructions has the same floating point registers throughout
its execution.
R=golang-dev, dave
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12298043
Per suggestion from Russ in February. Then strings.IndexByte
can be implemented in terms of the shared code in pkg runtime.
Update #3751
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12289043
I used just enough of the data provided by Matt in Issue 5915 to trigger
issue 5915. As luck would have it, using slightly less of it triggered
issue 5962.
Fixes#5915.
Fixes#5962.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12288043
This allows to at least determine goroutine "identity".
Now it looks like:
goroutine 12 [running]:
goroutine running on other thread; stack unavailable
created by testing.RunTests
src/pkg/testing/testing.go:440 +0x88e
R=golang-dev, r, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12248043
We see timeouts in these tests on some platforms,
but not on the others. The hypothesis is that
the problematic platforms are slow uniprocessors.
Stack traces do not suggest that the process
is completely hang, and it is able to schedule
the alarm goroutine. And if it actually hangs,
we still will be able to detect that.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12253043
