NetBSD's semaphore implementation is derived from OpenBSD's, but has
subsequently diverged due to cleanups that were only applied to the
latter (https://golang.org/cl/137960043, https://golang.org/cl/5563).
This CL applies analogous cleanups for NetBSD.
Notably, we can also remove the scary NetBSD deadlock warning.
NetBSD's manual pages document that lwp_unpark on a not-yet-parked LWP
will cause that LWP's next lwp_park system call to return immediately,
so there's no race hazard.
Change-Id: Ib06844c420d2496ac289748eba13eb4700bbbbb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5564
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Sing <jsing@google.com>
Rename "gothrow" to "throw" now that the C version of "throw"
is no longer needed.
This change is purely mechanical except in panic.go where the
old version of "throw" has been deleted.
sed -i "" 's/[[:<:]]gothrow[[:>:]]/throw/g' runtime/*.go
Change-Id: Icf0752299c35958b92870a97111c67bcd9159dc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2150
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
These signals are used by glibc to broadcast setuid/setgid to all
threads and to send pthread cancellations. Unlike other signals, the
Go runtime does not intercept these because they must invoke the libc
handlers (see issues #3871 and #6997). However, because 1) these
signals may be issued asynchronously by a thread running C code to
another thread running Go code and 2) glibc does not set SA_ONSTACK
for its handlers, glibc's signal handler may be run on a Go stack.
Signal frames range from 1.5K on amd64 to many kilobytes on ppc64, so
this may overflow the Go stack and corrupt heap (or other stack) data.
Fix this by ensuring that these signal handlers have the SA_ONSTACK
flag (but not otherwise taking over the handler).
This has been a problem since Go 1.1, but it's likely that people
haven't encountered it because it only affects setuid/setgid and
pthread_cancel.
Fixes#9600.
Change-Id: I6cf5f5c2d3aa48998d632f61f1ddc2778dcfd300
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1887
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
