1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-14 14:50:23 -07:00
Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Chase
7fbb1b36c3 cmd/internal/gc: improve flow of input params to output params
This includes the following information in the per-function summary:

outK = paramJ   encoded in outK bits for paramJ
outK = *paramJ  encoded in outK bits for paramJ
heap = paramJ   EscHeap
heap = *paramJ  EscContentEscapes

Note that (currently) if the address of a parameter is taken and
returned, necessarily a heap allocation occurred to contain that
reference, and the heap can never refer to stack, therefore the
parameter and everything downstream from it escapes to the heap.

The per-function summary information now has a tuneable number of bits
(2 is probably noticeably better than 1, 3 is likely overkill, but it
is now easy to check and the -m debugging output includes information
that allows you to figure out if more would be better.)

A new test was  added to check pointer flow through struct-typed and
*struct-typed parameters and returns; some of these are sensitive to
the number of summary bits, and ought to yield better results with a
more competent escape analysis algorithm.  Another new test checks
(some) correctness with array parameters, results, and operations.

The old analysis inferred a piece of plan9 runtime was non-escaping by
counteracting overconservative analysis with buggy analysis; with the
bug fixed, the result was too conservative (and it's not easy to fix
in this framework) so the source code was tweaked to get the desired
result.  A test was added against the discovered bug.

The escape analysis was further improved splitting the "level" into
3 parts, one tracking the conventional "level" and the other two
computing the highest-level-suffix-from-copy, which is used to
generally model the cancelling effect of indirection applied to
address-of.

With the improved escape analysis enabled, it was necessary to
modify one of the runtime tests because it now attempts to allocate
too much on the (small, fixed-size) G0 (system) stack and this
failed the test.

Compiling src/std after touching src/runtime/*.go with -m logging
turned on shows 420 fewer heap allocation sites (10538 vs 10968).

Profiling allocations in src/html/template with
for i in {1..5} ;
  do go tool 6g -memprofile=mastx.${i}.prof  -memprofilerate=1 *.go;
  go tool pprof -alloc_objects -text  mastx.${i}.prof ;
done

showed a 15% reduction in allocations performed by the compiler.

Update #3753
Update #4720
Fixes #10466

Change-Id: I0fd97d5f5ac527b45f49e2218d158a6e89951432
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8202
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-01 13:47:20 +00:00
Dmitry Vyukov
878a86a129 cmd/gc: fix escape analysis of closures
Fixes #10353

See test/escape2.go:issue10353. Previously new(int) did not escape to heap,
and so heap-allcated closure was referencing a stack var. This breaks
the invariant that heap must not contain pointers to stack.

Look at the following program:

package main

func main() {
	foo(new(int))
	bar(new(int))
}

func foo(x *int) func() {
	return func() {
		println(*x)
	}
}

// Models what foo effectively does.
func bar(x *int) *C {
	return &C{x}
}

type C struct {
	x *int
}

Without this patch escape analysis works as follows:

$ go build -gcflags="-m -m -m -l" esc.go
escflood:1: dst ~r1 scope:foo[0]
escwalk: level:0 depth:0  func literal( l(9) f(1) esc(no) ld(1)) scope:foo[1]
/tmp/live2.go:9: func literal escapes to heap
escwalk: level:0 depth:1 	 x( l(8) class(PPARAM) f(1) esc(no) ld(1)) scope:foo[1]
/tmp/live2.go:8: leaking param: x to result ~r1

escflood:2: dst ~r1 scope:bar[0]
escwalk: level:0 depth:0  &C literal( l(15) esc(no) ld(1)) scope:bar[1]
/tmp/live2.go:15: &C literal escapes to heap
escwalk: level:-1 depth:1 	 &C literal( l(15)) scope:bar[0]
escwalk: level:-1 depth:2 		 x( l(14) class(PPARAM) f(1) esc(no) ld(1)) scope:bar[1]
/tmp/live2.go:14: leaking param: x

/tmp/live2.go:5: new(int) escapes to heap
/tmp/live2.go:4: main new(int) does not escape

new(int) does not escape while being captured by the closure.
With this patch escape analysis of foo and bar works similarly:

$ go build -gcflags="-m -m -m -l" esc.go
escflood:1: dst ~r1 scope:foo[0]
escwalk: level:0 depth:0  &(func literal)( l(9)) scope:foo[0]
escwalk: level:-1 depth:1 	 func literal( l(9) f(1) esc(no) ld(1)) scope:foo[1]
/tmp/live2.go:9: func literal escapes to heap
escwalk: level:-1 depth:2 		 x( l(8) class(PPARAM) f(1) esc(no) ld(1)) scope:foo[1]
/tmp/live2.go:8: leaking param: x

escflood:2: dst ~r1 scope:bar[0]
escwalk: level:0 depth:0  &C literal( l(15) esc(no) ld(1)) scope:bar[1]
/tmp/live2.go:15: &C literal escapes to heap
escwalk: level:-1 depth:1 	 &C literal( l(15)) scope:bar[0]
escwalk: level:-1 depth:2 		 x( l(14) class(PPARAM) f(1) esc(no) ld(1)) scope:bar[1]
/tmp/live2.go:14: leaking param: x

/tmp/live2.go:4: new(int) escapes to heap
/tmp/live2.go:5: new(int) escapes to heap

Change-Id: Ifd14b7ae3fc11820e3b5eb31eb07f35a22ed0932
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8408
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2015-04-09 09:56:27 +00:00