Fixes#58141
Co-authored-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Achille Roussel <achille.roussel@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Fabre <ju.pryz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Phoenix <evan@phx.io>
Change-Id: I49b66946acc90fdf09ed9223096bfec9a1e5b923
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/479627
Run-TryBot: Johan Brandhorst-Satzkorn <johan.brandhorst@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Johan Brandhorst-Satzkorn <johan.brandhorst@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Change the run.go driver to recognize the "gc" build tag.
Change existing tests to use the "gc" build tag if they use some
feature that seems specific to the gc compiler, such as passing specific
options to or expecting specific behavior from "go tool compile".
Change tests to use the "!gccgo" build tag if they use "go build" or
"go run", as while those might work with compilers other than gc, they
won't work with the way that gccgo runs its testsuite (which happens
independently of the go command).
For #43252
Change-Id: I666e04b6d7255a77dfc256ee304094e3a6bb15ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/279052
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
During package initialization, the compiler tries to optimize:
var A = "foo"
var B = A
into
var A = "foo"
var B = "foo"
so that we can statically initialize both A and B and skip emitting
dynamic initialization code to assign "B = A".
However, this isn't safe in the presence of cmd/link's -X flag, which
might overwrite an initialized string-typed variable at link time. In
particular, if cmd/link changes A's static initialization, it won't
know it also needs to change B's static initialization.
To address this, this CL disables this optimization for string-typed
variables.
Fixes#34675.
Change-Id: I1c18f3b855f6d7114aeb39f96aaaf1b452b88236
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/198657
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The general policy for the current state of js/wasm is that it only
has to support tests that are also supported by nacl.
The test nilptr3.go makes assumptions about which nil checks can be
removed. Since WebAssembly does not signal on reading a null pointer,
all nil checks have to be explicit.
Updates #18892
Change-Id: I06a687860b8d22ae26b1c391499c0f5183e4c485
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110096
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The Go 1.6 release notes say we'll remove the “-X name value” form
(in favor of the “-X name=value” form) in Go 1.7.
Do that.
Also establish the doc/go1.7.txt file.
Change-Id: Ie4565a6bc5dbcf155181754d8d92bfbb23c75338
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19614
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
People invoking the linker directly already have to change their scripts
to use the new "go tool link", so this is a good time to make the -X flag
behave like all other Go flags and take just a single argument.
The old syntax will continue to be accepted (it is rewritten into the new
syntax before flag parsing). Maybe some day we will be able to retire it.
Even if we never retire the old syntax, having the new syntax at least
makes the rewriting much less of a kludge.
Change-Id: I91e8df94f4c22b2186e81d7f1016b8767d777eac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10310
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
If the user provided a key but no value via -ldflag -X,
another linker flag was used as the value.
Placing the user's flags at the end avoids this problem.
It also provides the user the opportunity to
override existing linker flags.
Fixes#8810.
Change-Id: I96f4190713dc9a9c29142e56658446fba7fb6bc8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2242
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
This test was added in CL 151000043.
It got lost in CL 144630044.
Change-Id: I318ab11be8e3e7489fc1395457c029c8bdb2aa41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1773
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The remaining run-only tests will be migrated to run.go in another CL.
This CL will break the build due to issues 8746 and 8806.
Update #4139
Update #8746
Update #8806
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc, bradfitz, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144630044
