Also add a link to a couple of the talks from GopherCon 2015.
Change-Id: I11e1c550e999553163d3fb5e900f167c849ce33f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12287
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
This seems to have broken arm64 in a mysterious way. Will try again later.
This reverts commit 0a3c991fd3.
Change-Id: Ic1b53413c4168977a27381d9cc6fb8d9d7cbb780
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12245
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
If we receive an HTTP request with "Expect: 100-continue" and the
Handler never read to EOF, the conn is in an unknown state.
Don't reuse that connection.
Fixes#11549
Change-Id: I5be93e7a54e899d615b05f72bdcf12b25304bc60
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12262
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Now that we care about the protocol of Git remotes (for the -insecure
flag), we need to recognize and parse the SCP-like remote format.
Fixesgolang/go#11457
Change-Id: Ia26132274fafb1cbfefe2475f7ac5f17ccd6da40
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12226
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Running a safe-point function on syscall entry uses systemstack() and
hence clobbers g.sched.pc and g.sched.sp. Fix this by re-saving them
after the systemstack, just like in the other uses of systemstack in
reentersyscall.
Change-Id: I47868a53eba24d81919fda56ef6bbcf72f1f922e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12125
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently, we run a P's safe-point function immediately after entering
_Psyscall state. This is unsafe, since as soon as we put the P in
_Psyscall, we no longer control the P and another M may claim it.
We'll still run the safe-point function only once (because doing so
races on an atomic), but the P may no longer be at a safe-point when
we do so.
In particular, this means that the use of forEachP to dispose all P's
gcw caches is unsafe. A P may enter a syscall, run the safe-point
function, and dispose the P's gcw cache concurrently with another M
claiming the P and attempting to use its gcw cache. If this happens,
we may empty the gcw's workbuf after putting it on
work.{full,partial}, or add pointers to it after putting it in
work.empty. This will cause an assertion failure when we later pop the
workbuf from the list and its object count is inconsistent with the
list we got it from.
Fix this by running the safe-point function just before putting the P
in _Psyscall.
Related to #11640. This probably fixes this issue, but while I'm able
to show that we can enter a bad safe-point state as a result of this,
I can't reproduce that specific failure.
Change-Id: I6989c8ca7ef2a4a941ae1931e9a0748cbbb59434
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12124
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
There was already special code to recognize "?" in hidden_structdcl,
which is used for inlined types and variables. This recognizes "?" in
structdcl as well, a case that arises when a struct type appears
within an inlined function body.
Fixes#10219.
Change-Id: Ic5257ae54f817e0d4a189c2294dcd633c9f2101a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12241
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The parser treats (R1+R2) on ppc64 the same as (R1,R2) on arm,
but it is not strictly a "register pair". Improve the text.
No semantic change.
Change-Id: Ib8b14881c6467add0d53150a901c01e962afb28b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12212
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
- Make Log2 exact for powers of two.
- Fix error tolerance function to make tolerance
a function of the correct (expected) value.
Fixes#9066.
Change-Id: I0320a93ce4130deed1c7b7685627d51acb7bc56d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12230
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Originally 'go test -h' printed the output of 'go help test'.
Then issue #6576 was filed, because that output didn't list (for example) -bench.
CL 14502065 changed 'go test -h' to print the output of 'go help testflag'.
Then issue #9209 was filed, because that output didn't list (for example) -c.
To print all the relevant flags, parts of both 'go help test' and 'go help testflag'
are needed. Refactor the help messages to make those parts available
and print them.
Fixes#9209.
Change-Id: Ie8205b8fb37d00c10d25b3fc98f14286ec46c4e3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12173
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Before, calling the RGBA method of YCbCr color would return red values
in the range [0x0080, 0xff80]. After, the range is [0x0000, 0xffff] and
is consistent with what Gray colors' RGBA method returns. In particular,
pure black, pure white and every Gray color in between are now exactly
representable as a YCbCr color.
This fixes a regression from Go 1.4 (where YCbCr{0x00, 0x80, 0x80} was
no longer equivalent to pure black), introduced by golang.org/cl/8073 in
the Go 1.5 development cycle. In Go 1.4, the +0x80 rounding was not
noticable when Cb == 0x80 && Cr == 0x80, because the YCbCr to RGBA
conversion truncated to 8 bits before multiplying by 0x101, so the
output range was [0x0000, 0xffff].
The TestYCbCrRoundtrip fuzzy-match tolerance grows from 1 to 2 because
the YCbCr to RGB conversion now maps to an ever-so-slightly larger
range, along with the usual imprecision of accumulating rounding errors.
Also s/int/int32/ in ycbcr.go. The conversion shouldn't overflow either
way, as int is always at least 32 bits, but it does make it clearer that
the computation doesn't depend on sizeof(int).
Fixes#11691
Change-Id: I538ca0adf7e040fa96c5bc8b3aef4454535126b9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12220
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Fixes#10963.
Change-Id: I8d769b4d25b306f2df41f882ec01d97bbd63171d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12221
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Fixes#10338.
Change-Id: Ib86cb9a6c694b1e442a9957153c7ca38a7d11c3e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12232
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes#3652. (Well, already fixed, but tests that it stays fixed.)
Change-Id: I4e17f595ee2ad513de86ac3861e8e66b1230b3be
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12195
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes#9224.
Change-Id: Ie0f4f14407099e4fa7ebe361a95b6492012928a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12192
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This fix only works on Git 2.3.0 and later.
There appears to be no portable way to fix the earlier versions.
We already run git with stdin closed, but on Unix git calls getpass,
which opens /dev/tty itself. We could do package syscall-specific
things to get /dev/tty invalidated during the exec, but I'd really
rather not. And on Windows, Git opens "CONIN$" and "CONOUT$"
itself, and I have no idea how to invalidate those.
Fix the problem for newish Git versions and wait for people to update.
Best we can do.
Fixes#9341.
Change-Id: I576579b106764029853e0f74d411e19108deecf5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12175
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Fixes#11305.
Change-Id: Icaa3a009aa4ab214c9aaf74f52c3e622fa266a9d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12194
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fix now uses same test as 'go build'.
Fixes#10500.
Change-Id: I2fcf2d95430643370aa29165d89a188988dee446
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12174
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Also use more consistent language for the new build options.
Change-Id: I88cbe200c13f452713be73d2e00337ddb793b8c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12172
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Also adds to 'go test' all the build flags that were missing
due to inconsistency in the duplication (for example, -toolexec).
Fixes#10504.
Change-Id: I1935b5caa13d5e551a0483904adffa8877087df7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12170
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
While we are here, fix a few things not updated for -insecure.
Fixes#8163.
Change-Id: Ib80c9ac00d6b61cce26c3d20bee3d30ab9af1331
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12148
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Was detecting only non-trivial ones.
Fixes#9690.
Change-Id: I662d81dd4818ddf29592057c090805772c84287b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12147
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
These used to be defined at use, but that breaks when shared libraries
are involved.
For #11480.
Change-Id: I416a848754fb615c0d75f9f0ccc00723d07f7f01
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12145
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
When the prologue call to morestack was moved down to the
bottom of the function, the pc/sp tables were not updated.
If a traceback through a call to morestack is needed, it would
get confused at and stop at morestack.
Confirmed the fix by adding //go:systemstack (which calls
morestackc, but same issue) where it did not belong
and inspecting the crash.
Change-Id: Id0294bb9dba51ef1a49154637228fb57f1086a94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12144
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
