Add support for literal completion candidates such as "[]int{}" or
"make([]int, 0)". We support both named and unnamed types. I used the
existing type matching logic, so, for example, if the expected type is
an interface, we will suggest literal candidates that implement the
interface.
The literal candidates have a lower score than normal matching
candidates, so they shouldn't be disruptive in cases where you don't
want a literal candidate.
This commit adds support for slice, array, struct, map, and channel
literal candidates since they are pretty similar. Functions will be
supported in a subsequent commit.
I also added support for setting a snippet's final tab stop. This is
useful if you want the cursor to end up somewhere other than the
character after the snippet.
Change-Id: Id3b74260fff4d61703989b422267021b00cec005
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193698
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When the value of a composite literal key/value pair was unparsable,
you were getting completions for the composite literal keys instead of
values. For example "struct { foo int }{foo: []<>" was completing to
the field name "foo". This was because the leaf ast.Node at the cursor
was the composite literal itself, and our go-back-one-character logic
was not happening because the preceding character's node
was *ast.BadExpr, not *ast.Ident. Fix by always generating the ast
path for the character before the cursor's position. I couldn't find
any cases where this broke completion.
I also added expected type detection for the following composite
literal cases:
- array/slice literals
- struct literals (both implicit and explicit field names)
- map keys and values
Fixesgolang/go#29153
Change-Id: If8cf678cbd743a970f52893fcf4a9b83ea06d7e9
GitHub-Last-Rev: f385705cc05eb98132e20561451dbb8c39b68519
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#86
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/173099
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
