I made the default be that, where there are differences between types2
and -G=0 error messages, we want errorcheck tests to pass types2.
Typically, we can get errorcheck to pass on types2 and -G=0 if they give
the same number of error messages on the same lines, just different
wording. If they give a different number of error messages, then I made
types2 pass. I added an exception list for -G=0 to cover those cases
where -G=0 and types give different numbers of error messages.
Because types2 does not run if there are syntax errors, for several
tests, I had to split the tests into two parts in order to get all the
indicated errors to be reported in types2 (bug228.go, bug388.go,
issue11610.go, issue14520.go)
I tried to preserve the GCCGO labeling correctly (but may have gotten
some wrong). When types2 now matches where a GCCGO error previously
occurred, I transformed GCCGO_ERROR -> ERROR. When types2 no longer
reports an error in a certain place, I transformed ERROR -> GCCGO_ERROR.
When types2 reports an error in a new place, I used GC_ERROR.
The remaining entries in types2Failures are things that I think we
probably still need to fix - either actually missing errors in types2,
or cases where types2 gives worse errors than -G=0.
Change-Id: I7f01e82b322b16094096b67d7ed2bb39b410c34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/372854
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
fixedbugs/issue14136.go:17:16: error: unknown field ‘X’ in ‘T’
fixedbugs/issue14136.go:18:13: error: incompatible type in initialization (cannot use type int as type string)
fixedbugs/issue14520.go:9:37: error: import path contains control character
fixedbugs/issue14520.go:14:2: error: expected ‘)’
fixedbugs/issue14520.go:14:3: error: expected declaration
fixedbugs/issue14652.go:9:7: error: use of undefined type ‘any’
fixedbugs/issue14729.go:13:17: error: embedded type may not be a pointer
fixedbugs/issue15514.dir/c.go:10: error: incompatible type in initialization
fixedbugs/issue15898.go:11:9: error: duplicate type in switch
fixedbugs/issue15898.go:16:9: error: duplicate type in switch
fixedbugs/issue16439.go:10:21: error: index expression is negative
fixedbugs/issue16439.go:13:21: error: index expression is negative
fixedbugs/issue16439.go:16:21: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/issue16439.go:18:22: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/issue17328.go:11:20: error: expected ‘{’
fixedbugs/issue17328.go:11:20: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline
fixedbugs/issue17328.go:13:1: error: expected declaration
fixedbugs/issue17588.go:14:15: error: expected type
fixedbugs/issue17631.go:20:17: error: unknown field ‘updates’ in ‘unnamed struct’
fixedbugs/issue17645.go:15:13: error: incompatible type in initialization
fixedbugs/issue17758.go:13:1: error: redefinition of ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue17758.go:9:1: note: previous definition of ‘foo’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18092.go:13:19: error: expected colon
fixedbugs/issue18231.go:17:12: error: may only omit types within composite literals of slice, array, or map type
fixedbugs/issue18393.go:24:38: error: expected type
fixedbugs/issue18419.dir/test.go:12: error: reference to unexported field or method 'member'
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:14:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:15:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:16:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:17:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:18:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:20:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:21:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:22:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:13:20: error: expected ‘;’ after statement in if expression
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:16:21: error: parse error in for statement
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:19:24: error: expected ‘;’ after statement in switch expression
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:13:12: error: ‘a’ declared but not used
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:16:13: error: ‘b’ declared but not used
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:19:16: error: ‘c’ declared but not used
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:16:17: error: return with value in function with no return type
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:18:9: error: return with value in function with no return type
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:22:16: error: argument 2 has incompatible type (cannot use type bool as type uint)
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:22:9: error: too many arguments
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:22:16: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:24:9: error: too many arguments
fixedbugs/issue19056.go:9:9: error: expected operand
fixedbugs/issue19056.go:9:9: error: expected ‘;’ or newline after top level declaration
fixedbugs/issue19482.go:25:15: error: expected struct field name
fixedbugs/issue19482.go:27:15: error: expected struct field name
fixedbugs/issue19482.go:31:19: error: expected struct field name
fixedbugs/issue19482.go:33:15: error: expected struct field name
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:13:1: error: expected operand
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:13:1: error: missing ‘)’
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:13:105: error: expected ‘;’ after statement in if expression
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:13:105: error: expected ‘{’
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:12:19: error: reference to undefined name ‘http’
Change-Id: Ia9c75b9c78671f354f0a0623dbc075157ef8f181
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/277433
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Towards better syntax error messages: With this change, the parser knows whether
a semicolon was an actual ';' in the source, or whether it was an automatically
inserted semicolon as result of a '\n' or EOF. Using this information in error
messages makes them more understandable.
For #17328.
Change-Id: I8cd9accee8681b62569d0ecef922d38682b401eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36636
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
If a general comment contains multiple newline characters, we can't
simply unread one and then re-lex it via the general whitespace lexing
phase, because then we'll reset lineno to the line before the "*/"
marker, rather than keeping it where we found the "/*" marker.
Also, for processing imports, call importfile before advancing the
lexer with p.next(), so that lineno reflects the line where we found
the import path, and not the token afterwards.
Fixes#14520.
Change-Id: I785a2d83d632280113d4b757de0d57c88ba2caf4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19934
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
