The sanity checking in pass 2 is wrong
when a select is offering to communicate in
either direction on a channel and neither case
is immediately ready.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3991047
The old heap maps used a multilevel table, but that
was overkill: there are only 1M entries on a 32-bit
machine and we can arrange to use a dense address
range on a 64-bit machine.
The heap map is in bss. The assumption is that if
we don't touch the pages they won't be mapped in.
Also moved some duplicated memory allocation
code out of the OS-specific files.
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4118042
Close of closed channel panics.
Receive from closed channel never panics,
even if done repeatedly.
Fixes#1349.
Fixes#1419.
R=gri, iant, ken2, r, gri1, r2, iant2, rog, albert.strasheim, niemeyer, ejsherry
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3989042
There were duplicate closes and missing closes,
with the result that the program was rarely testing
as much as it seemed to be. Now it finishes.
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4008046
The recent linker changes broke NaCl support
a month ago, and there are no known users of it.
The NaCl code can always be recovered from the
repository history.
R=adg, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3671042
- Skip the gccgo tests if we don't have it
- Add -lm so nbody.c will compile
- Pass 2098 to the meteor test (cf. the shootout site)
R=rsc, r, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3619042
cc: same
runtime: test cc alignment (required moving #define of offsetof to runtime.h)
fix bug260
Fixes#482.
Fixes#609.
R=ken2, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3563042
Specifically:
* lib/godoc:
- provide file set (FSet) argument to formatters where needed
* src/cmd:
- cgo, ebnflint, godoc, gofmt, goinstall: provide file set (fset) where needed
- godoc: remove local binary search with sort.Search (change by rsc),
extract file set for formatters
* src/pkg:
- exp/eval: remove embedded token.Position fields from nodes and replace
with named token.Pos fields; add corresponding Pos() accessor methods
- go/token: added file.Line(), changed signature of File.Position()
* test/fixedbugs/:
- bug206.go: change test to not rely on token.Pos details
* added various extra comments
* Runs all.bash
* gofmt formats all of src, misc w/o changes
* godoc runs
* performance:
- The new version of godoc consumes about the same space after indexing
has completed, but indexing is half the speed. Significant space savings
are expected from smaller ASTs, but since they are thrown away after a
file has been indexed, this is not visible anymore. The slower indexing
time is due to the much more expensive computation of line information.
However, with the new compressed position information, indexing can be
rewritten and simplified. Furthermore, computing the line info can be
done more efficiently.
New godoc, immediately after indexing completed (best of three runs):
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE
44381 godoc 0.0% 0:38.00 4 19 149 145M 184K 148M 176M
2010/12/03 17:58:35 index updated (39.231s, 18505 unique words, 386387 spots)
2010/12/03 17:58:35 bytes=90858456 footprint=199182584
2010/12/03 17:58:36 bytes=47858568 footprint=167295224
Old godoc, immediately after indexing completed (best of three runs):
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE
23167 godoc 0.0% 0:22.02 4 17 132 129M 184K 132M 173M
2010/12/03 14:51:32 index updated (24.892s, 18765 unique words, 393830 spots)
2010/12/03 14:51:32 bytes=66404528 footprint=163907832
2010/12/03 14:51:32 bytes=46282224 footprint=163907832
The different numbers for unique words/spots stem from the fact the the
two workspaces are not exactly identical. The new godoc maintains a large
file set data structure during indexing which (probably) is the reason
for the larger heap (90858456 vs 66404528) before garbage collection.
R=rsc, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3050041
Changed all uses of bytes.Add (aside from those testing bytes.Add) to append(a, b...).
Also ran "gofmt -s" and made use of copy([]byte, string) in the fasta benchmark.
R=golang-dev, r, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3302042
I tried adding a Scale method to big.Int and it didn't make any noticeable
difference, so I'm removing my TODO.
Also got rid of a few obvious allocations that I missed earlier for a modest
improvement (~5%).
R=golang-dev, gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/2711043