Fix#63955
parseIndVar, prove and maybe more are on the assumption that the loop header
is a single block. This can be wrong, ensure we don't match theses cases we
don't know how to handle.
In the future we could update them so that they know how to handle such cases
but theses cases seems rare so I don't think the value would be really high.
We could also run a loop canonicalization pass first which could handle this.
The repro case looks weird because I massaged it so it would crash with the
previous compiler.
Change-Id: I4aa8afae9e90a17fa1085832250fc1139c97faa6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/539977
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
