Change the Checker.use/useLHS functions to report if all "used"
expressions evaluated without error. Use that information to
control whether to report an assignment mismatch error or not.
This will reduce the number of errors reported per assignment,
where the assignment mismatch is only one of the errors.
Change-Id: Ia0fc3203253b002e4e1d5759d8d5644999af6884
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/478756
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
As with changes in prior CLs, we don't suppress legitimate
"declared but not used" errors anymore simply because the
respective variables are used in incorrect assignments,
unrelated to the variables in question.
Adjust several (ancient) tests accordingly.
Change-Id: I5826393264d9d8085c64777a330d4efeb735dd2d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/478716
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
I made the default be that, where there are differences between types2
and -G=0 error messages, we want errorcheck tests to pass types2.
Typically, we can get errorcheck to pass on types2 and -G=0 if they give
the same number of error messages on the same lines, just different
wording. If they give a different number of error messages, then I made
types2 pass. I added an exception list for -G=0 to cover those cases
where -G=0 and types give different numbers of error messages.
Because types2 does not run if there are syntax errors, for several
tests, I had to split the tests into two parts in order to get all the
indicated errors to be reported in types2 (bug228.go, bug388.go,
issue11610.go, issue14520.go)
I tried to preserve the GCCGO labeling correctly (but may have gotten
some wrong). When types2 now matches where a GCCGO error previously
occurred, I transformed GCCGO_ERROR -> ERROR. When types2 no longer
reports an error in a certain place, I transformed ERROR -> GCCGO_ERROR.
When types2 reports an error in a new place, I used GC_ERROR.
The remaining entries in types2Failures are things that I think we
probably still need to fix - either actually missing errors in types2,
or cases where types2 gives worse errors than -G=0.
Change-Id: I7f01e82b322b16094096b67d7ed2bb39b410c34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/372854
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
fixedbugs/issue14136.go:17:16: error: unknown field ‘X’ in ‘T’
fixedbugs/issue14136.go:18:13: error: incompatible type in initialization (cannot use type int as type string)
fixedbugs/issue14520.go:9:37: error: import path contains control character
fixedbugs/issue14520.go:14:2: error: expected ‘)’
fixedbugs/issue14520.go:14:3: error: expected declaration
fixedbugs/issue14652.go:9:7: error: use of undefined type ‘any’
fixedbugs/issue14729.go:13:17: error: embedded type may not be a pointer
fixedbugs/issue15514.dir/c.go:10: error: incompatible type in initialization
fixedbugs/issue15898.go:11:9: error: duplicate type in switch
fixedbugs/issue15898.go:16:9: error: duplicate type in switch
fixedbugs/issue16439.go:10:21: error: index expression is negative
fixedbugs/issue16439.go:13:21: error: index expression is negative
fixedbugs/issue16439.go:16:21: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/issue16439.go:18:22: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/issue17328.go:11:20: error: expected ‘{’
fixedbugs/issue17328.go:11:20: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline
fixedbugs/issue17328.go:13:1: error: expected declaration
fixedbugs/issue17588.go:14:15: error: expected type
fixedbugs/issue17631.go:20:17: error: unknown field ‘updates’ in ‘unnamed struct’
fixedbugs/issue17645.go:15:13: error: incompatible type in initialization
fixedbugs/issue17758.go:13:1: error: redefinition of ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue17758.go:9:1: note: previous definition of ‘foo’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18092.go:13:19: error: expected colon
fixedbugs/issue18231.go:17:12: error: may only omit types within composite literals of slice, array, or map type
fixedbugs/issue18393.go:24:38: error: expected type
fixedbugs/issue18419.dir/test.go:12: error: reference to unexported field or method 'member'
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:14:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:15:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:16:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:17:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:18:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:20:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:21:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:22:1: error: redefinition of ‘m’
fixedbugs/issue18655.go:13:1: note: previous definition of ‘m’ was here
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:13:20: error: expected ‘;’ after statement in if expression
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:16:21: error: parse error in for statement
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:19:24: error: expected ‘;’ after statement in switch expression
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:13:12: error: ‘a’ declared but not used
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:16:13: error: ‘b’ declared but not used
fixedbugs/issue18915.go:19:16: error: ‘c’ declared but not used
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:16:17: error: return with value in function with no return type
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:18:9: error: return with value in function with no return type
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:22:16: error: argument 2 has incompatible type (cannot use type bool as type uint)
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:22:9: error: too many arguments
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:22:16: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue19012.go:24:9: error: too many arguments
fixedbugs/issue19056.go:9:9: error: expected operand
fixedbugs/issue19056.go:9:9: error: expected ‘;’ or newline after top level declaration
fixedbugs/issue19482.go:25:15: error: expected struct field name
fixedbugs/issue19482.go:27:15: error: expected struct field name
fixedbugs/issue19482.go:31:19: error: expected struct field name
fixedbugs/issue19482.go:33:15: error: expected struct field name
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:13:1: error: expected operand
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:13:1: error: missing ‘)’
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:13:105: error: expected ‘;’ after statement in if expression
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:13:105: error: expected ‘{’
fixedbugs/issue19667.go:12:19: error: reference to undefined name ‘http’
Change-Id: Ia9c75b9c78671f354f0a0623dbc075157ef8f181
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/277433
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Fixes#19012.
Fallback to return signatures without detailed types.
These error message will be of the form of issue:
* https://golang.org/issues/4215
* https://golang.org/issues/6750
So:
func f(x int, y uint) {
return x > y
}
f(10, "a" < 3)
will give errors:
too many errors to return
too many arguments in call to f
instead of:
too many errors to return
have (<T>)
want ()
too many arguments in call to f
have (number, <T>)
want (number, number)
Change-Id: I680abc7cdd8444400e234caddf3ff49c2d69f53d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36806
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
