For #61422.
Change-Id: Ia7cb2721e52d9ccd932a49e0c331868eb7749f94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546027
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
CL 546025 failed to check if mp.curg is nil, causing all sorts of
failures. It can very well be nil in this context.
For #64318.
Fixes#64507.
Change-Id: I4a95c3fa16d5e1dee8041394c4bdb9c6ba04f032
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546636
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
These tests represent two patterns of usage, found in Google-internal
tests, that deadlocked after CL 506755.
TestConcurrentRun is a minor variation on TestParallelSub, with the
additional expectation that the concurrent calls to Run (without
explicit calls to Parallel) proceed without blocking. It replaces
TestParallelSub.
TestParentRun is similar, but instead of calling Run concurrently it
calls Run from within the subtest body. It almost certainly represents
an accidental misuse of T.Run, but since that pattern used to run to
completion we don't want to break it accidentally. (Perhaps it should
be diagnosed with a vet check instead?)
While we are testing concurrency, this also cleans up
TestConcurrentCleanup to use a clearer synchronization pattern.
Fixes#64402.
Change-Id: I14fc7e7085a994c284509eac28190c3a8feb04cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546019
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This was released in 1.21, release noted in CL 524675.
(I think it was missed originally and then and backported,
but then somehow incorrectly made it into the 1.22 dragnet.)
Change-Id: I45f3182f14f77f8b92a3b7d5ef0011b71fd3c176
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546675
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Using the new type Alias node, this issue is now fixed.
Add a test case.
Fixes#50729.
Change-Id: I22a4cf31b83de497e052989ca2054227e65e9937
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546455
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Update the go doc for linker flags. Remove flags that no longer
exist. Also remove flags that are intended for debugging the
linker from user docs. Add -aslr to the doc.
The -n flag does nothing except print a nearly useless message on
XCOFF linking. Deprecate it.
Fixes#64476.
Change-Id: I518c9c6cc009eae50b7c11308348524ad6a62b69
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546615
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The code generation on riscv64 will currently result in incorrect
assembly when a 32 bit integer is right shifted by an amount that
exceeds the size of the type. In particular, this occurs when an
int32 or uint32 is cast to a 64 bit type and right shifted by a
value larger than 31.
Fix this by moving the SRAW/SRLW conversion into the right shift
rules and removing the SignExt32to64/ZeroExt32to64. Add additional
rules that rewrite to SRAIW/SRLIW when the shift is less than the
size of the type, or replace/eliminate the shift when it exceeds
the size of the type.
Add SSA tests that would have caught this issue. Also add additional
codegen tests to ensure that the resulting assembly is what we
expect in these overflow cases.
Fixes#64285
Change-Id: Ie97b05668597cfcb91413afefaab18ee1aa145ec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545035
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: M Zhuo <mzh@golangcn.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Ryan <markdryan@rivosinc.com>
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The GoSyscallBegin event is a signal for both the P and the G to enter a
syscall state for the trace parser. (Ps can't have their own event
because it's too hard to model. As soon as the P enters _Psyscall it can
get stolen out of it.) But there's a window in time between when that
event is emitted and when the P enters _Psyscall where the P's status
can get emitted. In this window the tracer will emit the wrong status:
Running instead of Syscall. Really any call into the tracer could emit a
status event for the P, but in this particular case it's when running a
safepoint function that explicitly emits an event for the P's status.
The fix is straightforward. The source-of-truth on syscall status is the
G's status, so the function that emits the P's status just needs to
check the status of any G attached to it. If it's in _Gsyscall, then the
tracer should emit a Syscall status for the P if it's in _Prunning.
Fixes#64318.
Change-Id: I3b0fb0d41ff578e62810b04fa5a3ef73e2929b0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546025
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
For #61422.
Change-Id: Ie0d3c05752d29aa65983add85935d2505560ec55
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546029
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
With range over int, the rune literal in range expression will be left
as untyped rune, but idealType is not handling this case, causing ICE.
Fixing this by setting the concrete type for untyped rune expresison.
Fixes#64471
Change-Id: I07a151c54ea1d9e1b92e4d96cdfb6e73dca13862
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546296
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This bottoms out in internal/bytealg.Count, which does a fair amount
of avx shenanigans. Make sure we're not reading out of bounds.
Change-Id: Ied0e461f536f75acc24c6797f7fc74e3f3901c10
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/533116
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorropo <jorropo.pgm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Achille Roussel <achille.roussel@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
The shift amounts were wrong in this case, leading to miscompilation
of load combining.
Also the store combining was not triggering when it should.
Fixes#64468
Change-Id: Iaeb08972c5fc1d6f628800334789c6af7216e87b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546355
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The parallel subtests are themselves removed from the running map
while they are blocked on calls to t.Parallel, so it is misleading to
log their parents as if they are running when we know they cannot be
making any kind of meaningful progress.
Fixes#64404.
Change-Id: Iaad11d5d4f4c86d775d36e5285c49629dccddd74
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546018
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This is a follow-up to CL 536400.
Fixes#64446
Change-Id: I35646732f62cb1937fd448f94ea518544d4295d4
GitHub-Last-Rev: 55db18a909
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64448
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545835
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Jes Cok <xigua67damn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Previously, its value was unset (NoPos), but the correct
value is a point after the signature (FuncType.End) and
before the body.
Also, fix a bug in Scope.Innermost whereby it would return
the wrong (outer) scope when the query position was in
the FuncType portion of a Func{Decl,Lit}.
The fix is to set the scope's pos/end to those of the
complete Func{Decl,Lit}. This is now documented at
Info.Scopes, along with other missing information.
Also, fix a bug in the go/types (but not types2) scope
test, in which comments were discarded by the parser,
causing the entire test to be a no-op (!).
Also, make failures of TestScopeLookupParent more
informative.
Also, add a release note about the change in behavior.
Fixes#64292Fixes#64295
Change-Id: Ib681f59d1b0b43de977666db08302d7524d3305f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544035
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
As per #62352 the invocation of vmmap may fail (very rarely) due to
a temporary lack of resources on the test runner machine. This PR
allows for retrying the invocation a fixed number of times before
giving up. This is because we suspect the failure is due to
sensible to retry.
Fixes: #62352
Change-Id: I51aa66b949753d8127cc307181b6ef32e91d5b05
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545935
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
The Go 1.22 code freeze has recently started. This is a time to update
all golang.org/x/... module versions that contribute packages to the
std and cmd modules in the standard library to latest master versions.
Generated with:
go install golang.org/x/build/cmd/updatestd@latest
go install golang.org/x/tools/cmd/bundle@latest
updatestd -goroot=$(pwd) -branch=master
For #36905.
Change-Id: I76525261b9a954ed21a3bd3cb6c4a12e6c031d80
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-windows-amd64-longtest,gotip-linux-amd64-longtest,gotip-linux-386-longtest
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546055
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
See CL 514907
Change-Id: Ieba2d7737115c66990b0ea7629033e787a99be93
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545655
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ludi Rehak <ludi317@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
testCallbackCallersSEH will break if anything in this call chain is
refactored to have a different number of function calls.
This change makes the test more robust by only testing the frames
that are actually relevant to the test.
Change-Id: Idb51514d7079f55da6e6ddc52ad43b1ffe32c8c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545755
Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
On non-pthread platforms, it's totally possible for the same M to
GoCreateSyscall/GoDestroySyscall on the same thread multiple times. That
same thread may hold onto its P through all those calls.
For #64060.
Change-Id: Ib968bfd439ecd5bc24fc98d78c06145b0d4b7802
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545515
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
ReadMemStats has a few assertions it makes about the consistency of the
stats it's about to produce. Specifically, how those stats line up with
runtime-internal stats. These checks are generally useful, but crashing
just because some stats are wrong is a heavy price to pay.
For a long time this wasn't a problem, but very recently it became a
real problem. It turns out that there's real benign skew that can happen
wherein sysmon (which doesn't synchronize with a STW) generates a trace
event when tracing is enabled, and may mutate some stats while
ReadMemStats is running its checks.
Fix this by synchronizing with both sysmon and the tracer. This is a bit
heavy-handed, but better that than false positives.
Also, put the checks behind a debug mode. We want to reduce the risk of
backporting this change, and again, it's not great to crash just because
user-facing stats are off. Still, enable this debug mode during the
runtime tests so we don't lose quite as much coverage from disabling
these checks by default.
Fixes#64401.
Change-Id: I9adb3e5c7161d207648d07373a11da8a5f0fda9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545277
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Geisendörfer <felix.geisendoerfer@datadoghq.com>
Most contention on the runtime locks inside semaphores is observed in
runtime.semrelease1, but it can also appear in runtime.semacquire1. When
examining contention profiles in TestRuntimeLockMetricsAndProfile, allow
call stacks that include either.
For #64253
Change-Id: Id4f16af5e9a28615ab5032a3197e8df90f7e382f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544375
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
The type of the data pointer field of a slice should be a pointer
to the element type, not a *uint8.
This ensures that the SSA value representing the slice's data pointer
can be spilled to the stack slot for the corresponding argument.
Before this change the types didn't match so we ended up spilling the
argument to an autotmp instead of to the dedicated argument slot.
Fixes#64414
Change-Id: I09ee39e93f05aee07e3eceb14e39736d7fd70a33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545357
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
On Darwin, the ptrace syscall is called in ptrace1, which then be
called in ptrace. This allows ptrace1 be disabled on iOS (by
implementing ptrace differently). But we can also achieve this by
adding a conditional directly in ptrace. This reduces stack usage
with -N -l, while keeping ptrace disabled on iOS.
For #64113.
Change-Id: I89d8e317e77352fffdbb5a25ba21ee9cdf2e1e20
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545276
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
For #61422.
Change-Id: I0e091c30a445dbc55054c31837c6f051fea3c07d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544537
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
bugs:
* drop unused labels
* drop the reproduce checkbox:
it's not a strong signal and introduces clutter in github as a task list
* link go.dev/play
govuln:
* use correct label
* ask for version of the tool
* link go.dev/play
telemetry:
* align title with purpose
Change-Id: Id7dd876e518c75dc22e9aec43d9af6e18af088fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544775
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Change-Id: I6d40a59cde4c3f1d5094f5126fdbc1195285195f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/539577
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
The multiple issue templates pre-populate the issue title with a prefix
that Go issues customarily have. The "affected/package" phrase is short
for "the import path of the affected package". Let's try simplifying it
to just "import/path", and also include "issue title" to make the title
a more representative template of what the final title should look like.
Updates #29839.
Change-Id: I9736d24cf3d0a51536ac13dd07dd189fb51da021
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544556
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Liao <sean@liao.dev>
We can get the previous templates back from version control if needed.
Delete these unused copies to avoid confusion.
For #63970.
Change-Id: I44e54da06e259239745f4a493de1dae94cca3755
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544536
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The exitsyscall path, since the introduction of the new execution
tracer, stores a just little bit more data in the exitsyscall stack
frame, causing a build failure from exceeding the nosplit limit with
'-N -l' set on all packages (like Delve does).
One of the paths through which this fails is "throw" from wirep, called
by a callee of exitsyscall. By switching to the systemstack on this
path, we can avoid hitting the nosplit limit, fixing the build. It's
also not totally unreasonable to switch to the systemstack for the
throws in this function, since the function has to be nosplit anyway. It
gives the throw path a bit more wiggle room to dump information than it
otherwise would have.
Fixes#64113.
Change-Id: I56e94e40614a202b8ac2fdc8b8b731493b74e5d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544535
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This is required by traceThreadDestroy, though it's not strictly
necessary in this case. The requirement to hold sched.lock comes from
the assumption that traceThreadDestroy is getting called when the thread
leaves the tracer's view, but in this case the extra m that dropm is
dropping never leaves the allm list. Nevertheless, traceThreadDestroy
requires it just as a safety measure, and that's reasonable. dropm is
generally rare on pthread platforms, so the extra lock acquire over this
short critical section (and only when tracing is enabled) is fine.
Change-Id: Ib631820963c74f2f087d14a0067d0441d75d6785
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544396
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently the wakeableSleep lock is placed just after timers in the
ranking, but it turns out the timers lock can never be held over a timer
func, so that's wrong. Meanwhile, wakeableSleep can acquire sched.lock.
wakeableSleep, as it turns out, doesn't have any dependencies -- it's
always acquired in a (mostly) regular goroutine context.
Change-Id: Icc8ea76a8b309fbaf0f02215f16e5f706d49cd95
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544395
TryBot-Bypass: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
semrelease may unblock a goroutine, but the act of unblocking a
goroutine may emit an event, which in turn may try to acquire trace.lock
again.
It's safe to release trace.lock in readTrace0 for this because all of
the state (one variable) it uses under the lock will be recomputed when
it reacquires the lock. There's also no other synchronization
requirement to hold trace.lock. This is just a mistake.
Change-Id: Iff6c6b02efa298ebed8e60cdf6539ec161d5ec48
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544178
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
There's a conceptual cycle between traceStackTable.lock and
allocation-related locks, but it can't happen in practice because the
caller guarantees that there are no more writers to the table at the
point that dump is called.
But if that's true, then the lock isn't necessary at all. It would be
difficult to model this quiesence in the lockrank mode, so just don't
hold the lock and expand the documentation of the dump method.
Change-Id: Id4db61363f075b7574135529915e8bd4f4f4c082
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544177
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Unwind info in .xdata was being parsed incorrectly, causing targetOff to
be incorrect and miss finding data in .xdata that it should have found.
This causes a linker issue when using the MinGW MSVCRT compiler.
Contains several fixes based on the exception handling docs: the offset
used to get the number of unwind codes, the calculation of the target
offset based on the dynamic size of the unwind data, and the
UNW_FLAG_CHAININFO flag's value.
Fixes#64200
Change-Id: I6483d921b2bf8a2512a95223bf3c8ce8bc63dc4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544415
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
The code path in linker DWARF type generation that synthesizes pointer
type DIEs needed for other synthesized types wasn't properly setting
the DW_AT_go_kind attribute for the new pointer types.
Fixes#64231.
Change-Id: I70c338d2b33ae3b93a4c6f201e5836d91d368086
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544315
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
When I initially added the wasm code for these ops I did not saw that
wasm actually has the Cas operations implemented, although they are
merely pointer assignments since wasm is single threaded.
Now with a generic implementation for And/Or we can add wasm to the
build tags.
For #61395
Change-Id: I997dc90477c772882d6703df1b795dfc0d90a699
GitHub-Last-Rev: 92736a6e34
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64300
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544116
Run-TryBot: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
