I structured the test for issue54343.go after issue46725.go, where I
was careful to use `[4]int`, which is a type large enough to avoid the
tiny object allocator (which interferes with finalizer semantics). But
in that test, I didn't note the importance of that type, so I
mistakenly used just `int` in issue54343.go.
This CL switches issue54343.go to use `[4]int` too, and then adds
comments to both pointing out the significance of this type.
Updates #54343.
Change-Id: I699b3e64b844ff6d8438bbcb4d1935615a6d8cc4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/423115
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The Go 1.18 frontend handles package-scope generic method values by
spilling the receiver value to a global temporary variable, which pins
it into memory. This issue isn't present in unified IR, which uses
OMETHVALUE when the receiver type is statically known.
Updates #54343.
Change-Id: I2c4ffeb125a3cf338f949a93b0baac75fff6cd31
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/422198
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
