The logic for extracting a function is quite signficant, and the code
is expensive enough that we should only call it when requested by the
user. This means that we should support extracting through a command
rather than text edits in the code action.
To that end, we create a new struct for commands. Features like extract
variable and extract function can supply functions to determine if they
are relevant to the given range, and if so, to generate their text
edits. source.Analyzers now point to Commands, rather than
SuggestedFixFuncs. The "canExtractVariable" and "canExtractFunction"
functions still need improvements, but I think that can be done in a
follow-up.
Change-Id: I9ec894c5abdbb28505a0f84ad7c76aa50977827a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244598
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This CL is a follow-up from CL 241983. I didn't realize that the
undeclaredname analysis was also using the go/printer.Fprint trick,
which we decided was both incorrect and inefficient. This CL does
approximately the same things as CL 241983, with a few changes to make
the approach more general.
source.Analyzer now has a field to indicate if its suggested fix needs
to be computed separately, and that is used to determine which
code actions get commands. We also make helper functions to map
analyses to their commands.
I figured out a neater way to test suggested fixes in this CL, so I
reversed the move to source_test back to lsp_test (which was the right
place all along).
Change-Id: I505bf4790481d887edda8b82897e541ec73fb427
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/242366
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
I add a code action that triggers upon request of the user. A variable
name is generated manually for the extracted code because the LSP does
not support a user's ability to provide a name.
Change-Id: Id1ec19b49562b7cfbc2cd416378bec9bd021d82f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/240182
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Getting the right indentation for the text in the AST proves to be a
little complicated. The most reasonable approach seems to be writing
out the AST, getting the lines with the struct definition on it,
and trimming whitespace to get the current indent. Then, we add this
indent to the struct fields in the new text.
Change-Id: I1cc3421d95edae61cfb662254ff3fb759b5c487f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/239199
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This change is the first step in handling golang/go#38136. Instead of
creating multiple diagnostic reports for type error analyzers, we add
suggested fixes to the existing reports. To match the analyzers for
FindAnalysisError, we add an ErrorMatch function to source.Analyzer.
This is not an ideal solution, but it was the best one I could come up
with without modifying the go/analysis API. analysisinternal could be
used for this purpose, but it seemed to complicated to be worth it, and
this is fairly simple. I think that go/analysis itself might need to be
extended for type error analyzers, but these temporary measures will
help us understand the kinds of features we need for type error
analyzers.
A follow-up CL might be to not add reports for type error analyzers
until the end of source.Diagnostic, which would remove the need for the
look-up.
Fixesgolang/go#38136
Change-Id: I25bc6396b09d49facecd918bf5591d2d5bdf1b3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226777
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This change adds a quick fix for diagnostics that have an error message of the form "undeclared name: %s". It provides a quick fix to add a new variable with that name.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I6534ee79d1770d1a62bac169c3c7e52e2443f39e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222237
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
