1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-17 09:54:46 -07:00
Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Cuong Manh Le
77f5adba55 cmd/compile: don't use statictmps for small object in slice literal
Fixes #21561

Change-Id: I89c59752060dd9570d17d73acbbaceaefce5d8ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197560
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-10-08 06:09:26 +00:00
LE Manh Cuong
ec4e8517cd cmd/compile: support more length types for slice extension optimization
golang.org/cl/109517 optimized the compiler to avoid the allocation for make in
append(x, make([]T, y)...). This was only implemented for the case that y has type int.

This change extends the optimization to trigger for all integer types where the value
is known at compile time to fit into an int.

name             old time/op    new time/op    delta
ExtendInt-12        106ns ± 4%     106ns ± 0%      ~     (p=0.351 n=10+6)
ExtendUint64-12    1.03µs ± 5%    0.10µs ± 4%   -90.01%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)

name             old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
ExtendInt-12        0.00B          0.00B           ~     (all equal)
ExtendUint64-12    13.6kB ± 0%     0.0kB       -100.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name             old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
ExtendInt-12         0.00           0.00           ~     (all equal)
ExtendUint64-12      1.00 ± 0%      0.00       -100.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

Updates #29785

Change-Id: Ief7760097c285abd591712da98c5b02bc3961fcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/182559
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2019-09-17 17:18:17 +00:00
Keith Randall
933e34ac99 cmd/compile: treat slice pointers as non-nil
var a []int = ...
p := &a[0]
_ = *p

We don't need to nil check on the 3rd line. If the bounds check on the 2nd
line passes, we know p is non-nil.

We rely on the fact that any cap>0 slice has a non-nil pointer as its
pointer to the backing array. This is true for all safely-constructed slices,
and I don't see any reason why someone would violate this rule using unsafe.

R=go1.13

Fixes #30366

Change-Id: I3ed764fcb72cfe1fbf963d8c1a82e24e3b6dead7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/163740
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
2019-02-26 20:44:52 +00:00
Martin Möhrmann
a8a60ac2a7 cmd/compile: optimize append(x, make([]T, y)...) slice extension
Changes the compiler to recognize the slice extension pattern

  append(x, make([]T, y)...)

and replace it with growslice and an optional memclr to avoid an allocation for make([]T, y).

Memclr is not called in case growslice already allocated a new cleared backing array
when T contains pointers.

amd64:
name                      old time/op    new time/op    delta
ExtendSlice/IntSlice         103ns ± 4%      57ns ± 4%   -44.55%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
ExtendSlice/PointerSlice     155ns ± 3%      77ns ± 3%   -49.93%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
ExtendSlice/NoGrow          50.2ns ± 3%     5.2ns ± 2%   -89.67%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)

name                      old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
ExtendSlice/IntSlice         64.0B ± 0%     32.0B ± 0%   -50.00%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
ExtendSlice/PointerSlice     64.0B ± 0%     32.0B ± 0%   -50.00%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
ExtendSlice/NoGrow           32.0B ± 0%      0.0B       -100.00%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)

name                      old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
ExtendSlice/IntSlice          2.00 ± 0%      1.00 ± 0%   -50.00%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
ExtendSlice/PointerSlice      2.00 ± 0%      1.00 ± 0%   -50.00%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
ExtendSlice/NoGrow            1.00 ± 0%      0.00       -100.00%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)

Fixes #21266

Change-Id: Idc3077665f63cbe89762b590c5967a864fd1c07f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/109517
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
2018-05-06 04:28:23 +00:00
Martin Möhrmann
500d79c410 cmd/compile: refactor memclrrange for arrays and slices
Rename memclrrange to signify that it does not handle
all types of range clears.

Simplify checks to detect the range clear idiom for
arrays and slices.

Add tests to verify the optimization for the slice
range clear idiom is being applied by the compiler.

Change-Id: I5c3b7c9a479699ebdb4c407fde692f30f377860c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110477
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-05-02 04:20:25 +00:00