Preventing returning io.EOF on non-connection oriented sockets is
already applied to Unix variants. This CL applies it to Windows.
Update #4856.
Change-Id: I82071d40f617e2962d0540b9d1d6a10ea4cdb2ec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2203
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
There is no reason to have the redundant test case TestDNSThreadLimt
because TestLookupIPDeadline does cover what we need to test with
-dnsflood flag and more.
Also this CL moves TestLookupIPDeadline into lookup_test.go to avoid
abusing to control the order of test case execution by using file name.
Change-Id: Ib417d7d3411c59d9352c03c996704d584368dc62
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2204
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
We already had client support for trailers, but no way for a server to
set them short of hijacking the connection.
Fixes#7759
Change-Id: Ic83976437739ec6c1acad5f209ed45e501dbb93a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2157
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Currently when we get a CGI or FCGI request, the remote port of the client
is hard coded to zero, despite nearly every webserver passing down the
REMOTE_PORT variable.
This was likely originally excluded because the CGI RFC (rfc3875) does not
mention anything about the remote port of the client. However every webserver
tested does pass REMOTE_PORT down. This includes Apache 2.2, Apache 2.4,
nginx and lighttpd.
Fixes#8351
Change-Id: I4c6366cb39f0ccc05e038bd31d85f93b76e8d0c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1750
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Given a file of size N, a request for "Range: bytes=N-*" should
return a 416 [1]. Currently, it returns a 206 and a body of 0
bytes, with the illegal Content-Range of "bytes N-(N-1)/N" [2].
[1]: RFC 7233, sec 2.1: "If a valid byte-range-set includes at least one
byte-range-spec with a first-byte-pos that is less than the current
length of the representation, [...]". sec 3.1: "If all of the
preconditions are true, the server supports the Range header field for
the target resource, and the specified range(s) are invalid or
unsatisfiable, the server SHOULD send a 416 (Range Not Satisfiable)
response."
[2]: RFC 7233, sec 4.2: "A Content-Range field value is invalid if it
contains a byte-range-resp that has a last-byte-pos value less than its
first-byte-pos value, [...]"
Fixes#8988
Change-Id: If3e1134e7815f5d361efea01873b29aafe3de817
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1862
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Co-hacking with Dave Cheney.
Fixes#9405
Change-Id: I14fc3b6a47dcdb5e514e93d062b804bb24e89f47
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1875
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
I broke the build in https://golang.org/change/207950a when I made
http.Transport send "Connection: close" request headers when
DisableKeepAlives was set true because I didn't run all the tests
before submitting.
httputil.DumpRequestOut used Transport to get its output, and used it
with DisableKeepAlives, so this changed the output.
Rather than updating golden data in our tests (because surely others
depend on the exact bytes from these in their tests), switch to not
using DisableKeepAlives in DumpRequestOut instead, so the output is
the same as before.
Change-Id: I9fad190be8032e55872e6947802055a6d65244df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1632
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
No bug was open, but I found an old email to myself to investigate
when I suspected this was happening.
Change-Id: Icedefec6f15a000eaabb2693b0640b3b6c8bf82c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1578
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Actually fixing this "bug" would be weird, since io.LimitReader already
does what we need, as demonstrated by net/http's use.
Thanks to @davidfstr for pointing this out.
Change-Id: If707bcc698d1666a369b39ddfa9770685fbe3879
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1579
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Per private thread soliciting help. I realized part of this is
documented in several places, but we lacked a unifying
example.
LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews
CC=adg, golang-codereviews, iant, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/171620043
New detection because of net/http now using TestMain.
Fixes#9033
LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=adg, golang-codereviews, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/170210043
Just to confirm the fix, by typing the follwing:
go test -run=TestLookupIPDeadline -dnsflood or
go test -run=TestLookupIPDeadline -dnsflood -tags netgo
Update #8602
LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/166740043
Before this CL, if the system resolver does a very slow DNS
lookup for a particular host, all subsequent requests for that
host will hang waiting for that lookup to complete. That is
more or less expected when Dial is called with no deadline.
When Dial has a deadline, though, we can accumulate a large
number of goroutines waiting for that slow DNS lookup. Try to
avoid this problem by restarting the DNS lookup when it is
redone after a deadline is passed.
This CL also avoids creating an extra goroutine purely to
handle the deadline.
No test because we would have to simulate a slow DNS lookup
followed by a fast DNS lookup.
Fixes#8602.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=bradfitz, mikioh.mikioh
CC=golang-codereviews, r, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/154610044
We force runtime.GC before WriteHeapProfile with -test.heapprofile.
Make it possible to do the same with the HTTP interface.
Some servers only run a GC every few minutes.
On such servers, the heap profile will be a few minutes stale,
which may be too old to be useful.
Requested by private mail.
LGTM=dvyukov
R=dvyukov
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/161990043
The http package by default adds "Accept-Encoding: gzip" to outgoing
requests, unless it's a bad idea, or the user requested otherwise.
Only when the http package adds its own implicit Accept-Encoding header
does the http package also transparently un-gzip the response.
If the user requested part of a document (e.g. bytes 40 to 50), it appears
that Github/Varnish send:
range(gzip(content), 40, 50)
And not:
gzip(range(content, 40, 50))
The RFC 2616 set of replacements (with the purpose of
clarifying ambiguities since 1999) has an RFC about Range
requests (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7233) but does not
mention the interaction with encodings.
Regardless of whether range(gzip(content)) or gzip(range(content)) is
correct, this change prevents the Go package from asking for gzip
in requests if we're also asking for Range, avoiding the issue.
If the user cared, they can do it themselves. But Go transparently
un-gzipping a fragment of gzip is never useful.
Fixes#8923
LGTM=adg
R=adg
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/155420044
This avoids a pop-up box on OS X and it avoids
a test failure if something is using 5555.
I apologize for not noticing this during the review.
TBR=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/152320044
http.Client calls URL.String() to fill in the Referer header, which may
contain authentication info. This patch removes authentication info from
the Referer header without introducing any API changes.
A new test for net/http is also provided.
This is the polished version of Alberto García Hierro's
https://golang.org/cl/9766046/
It should handle https Referer right.
Fixes#8417
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, gobot, bradfitz, mikioh.mikioh
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/151430043
This test is flaky, just like TestDualStackTCPListener.
That one was disabled. Disable this one too.
Update #5001
LGTM=bradfitz
R=rlh, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/154950043
The nicest solution would be to buffer the message and only write
it if it encodes correctly, but that adds considerable memory and
CPU overhead for a very rare condition. Instead, we just shut
down the connection if this happens.
Fixes#7689.
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/146670043
Bodies larger than 8KB (the default bufio reader size) weren't
being dumped. Force a read of the body so they're teed into
the response buffer.
Thanks to Steven Hartland for identifying the problem.
Fixes#8089
LGTM=r
R=golang-codereviews, r
CC=adg, golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144650044
See comment 4 of https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=8483#c4:
"So if a user creates a http.Client, issues a bunch of
requests and then wants to shutdown it and all opened connections;
what is she intended to do? The report suggests that just waiting for
all pending requests and calling CloseIdleConnections won't do, as
there can be new racing connections. Obviously she can't do what
you've done in the test, as it uses the unexported function. If this
happens periodically, it can lead to serious resource leaks (the
transport is also preserved alive). Am I missing something?"
This CL tracks the user's intention to close all idle
connections (CloseIdleConnections sets it true; and making a
new request sets it false). If a pending dial finishes and
nobody wants it, before it's retained for a future caller, the
"wantIdle" bool is checked and it's closed if the user has
called CloseIdleConnections without a later call to make a new
request.
Fixes#8483
LGTM=adg
R=golang-codereviews, dvyukov, adg
CC=golang-codereviews, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/148970043
Not sure why they used empty.s and all these other
packages were special cased in cmd/go instead.
Add them to the list.
This avoids problems with net .s files being compiled
with gcc in cgo mode and gcc not supporting // comments
on ARM.
Not a problem with bytes, but be consistent.
The last change fixed the ARM build but broke the Windows build.
Maybe *this* will make everyone happy. Sigh.
TBR=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/144530046
In cgo mode it gets passed to gcc, and on ARM
it appears that gcc does not support // comments.
TBR=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/142640043
Those C files would have been compiled with 6c.
It's close to impossible to use C correctly anymore,
and the C compilers are going away eventually.
Make them unavailable now.
go1.4.txt change in CL 145890046
LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews, r
https://golang.org/cl/149720043
