Don't convert values that aren't Go constants, like
uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(nil)), to a literal constant. This avoids
assuming they are constants for things like indexing, array sizes,
case duplication, etc.
Also, nil is an allowed duplicate in switches. CTNILs aren't Go constants.
Fixes#28078Fixes#28079
Change-Id: I9ab8af47098651ea09ef10481787eae2ae2fb445
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151320
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When a slice composite literal is sparse, initialize it dynamically
instead of statically.
s := []int{5:5, 20:20}
To initialize the backing store for s, use 2 constant writes instead
of copying from a static array with 21 entries.
This CL also fixes pathologies in the compiler when the slice is
*very* sparse.
Fixes#23780
Change-Id: Iae95c6e6f6a0e2994675cbc750d7a4dd6436b13b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151319
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Abort evconst if its argument isn't a Go constant. The SSA backend
will do the optimizations in question later. They tend to be weird
cases, like uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(uintptr(1))).
Fix OADDSTR and OCOMPLEX cases in isGoConst.
OADDSTR has its arguments in n.List, not n.Left and n.Right.
OCOMPLEX might have a 2-result function as its arg in List[0]
(in which case it isn't a Go constant).
Fixes#24760
Change-Id: Iab312d994240d99b3f69bfb33a443607e872b01d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151338
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
In assembly free packages (aka "complete" or "pure go"), allow
bodyless functions if they are linkname'd to something else.
Presumably the thing the function is linkname'd to has a definition.
If not, the linker will complain. And linkname is unsafe, so we expect
users to know what they are doing.
Note this handles only one direction, where the linkname directive
is in the local package. If the linkname directive is in the remote
package, this CL won't help. (See os/signal/sig.s for an example.)
Fixes#23311
Change-Id: I824361b4b582ee05976d94812e5b0e8b0f7a18a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151318
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This commit allows the runtime to handle 64bits addresses returned by
mmap syscall on AIX.
Mmap syscall returns addresses on 59bits on AIX. But the Arena
implementation only allows addresses with less than 48 bits.
This commit increases the arena size up to 1<<60 for aix/ppc64.
Update: #25893
Change-Id: Iea72e8a944d10d4f00be915785e33ae82dd6329e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/138736
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
When using soft-float, OMUL might be rewritten to function call
so we should ensure it was evaluated first.
Fixes#28688
Change-Id: I30b87501782fff62d35151f394a1c22b0d490c6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/148837
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Because run.go doesn't pass the package being compiled to the compiler
via the -p flag, it can't match up the main·f symbol from the
assembler with the "func f" stub in Go, so it doesn't produce the
correct assembly stub.
Fix this by removing the package prefix from the assembly definition.
Alternatively, we could make run.go pass -p to the compiler, but it's
nicer to remove these package prefixes anyway.
Should fix the linux-arm builder, which was broken by the introduction
of function ABIs in CL 147160.
Updates #27539.
Change-Id: Id62b7701e1108a21a5ad48ffdb5dad4356c273a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149483
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
When we set an explicit argmap, we may want only a prefix of that
argmap. Argmap is set when the function is reflect.makeFuncStub or
reflect.methodValueCall. In this case, arglen specifies how much of
the args section is actually live. (It could be either all the args +
results, or just the args.)
Fixes#28750
Change-Id: Idf060607f15a298ac591016994e58e22f7f92d83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149217
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
We have an existing optimization that recognizes
memory moves of the form A -> B -> C and converts
them into A -> C, in the hopes that the store to
B will be end up being dead and thus eliminated.
However, when A, B, and C are large types,
the front end sometimes emits VarDef ops for the moves.
This change adds an optimization to match that pattern.
This required changing an old compiler test.
The test assumed that a temporary was required
to deal with a large return value.
With this optimization in place, that temporary
ended up being eliminated.
Triggers 649 times during 'go build -a std cmd'.
Cuts 16k off cmd/go.
name old object-bytes new object-bytes delta
Template 507kB ± 0% 507kB ± 0% -0.15% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Unicode 225kB ± 0% 225kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
GoTypes 1.85MB ± 0% 1.85MB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Flate 328kB ± 0% 328kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
GoParser 402kB ± 0% 402kB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Reflect 1.41MB ± 0% 1.41MB ± 0% -0.20% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Tar 458kB ± 0% 458kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
XML 601kB ± 0% 599kB ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Change-Id: I9b5f25c8663a0b772ad1ee51fa61f74b74d26dd3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/143479
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
This is a simple tweak to allow a bit more mid-stack inlining.
In cases like this:
func f() {
g()
}
We'd really like to inline f into its callers. It can't hurt.
We implement this optimization by making calls a bit cheaper, enough
to afford a single call in the function body, but not 2.
The remaining budget allows for some argument modification, or perhaps
a wrapping conditional:
func f(x int) {
g(x, 0)
}
func f(x int) {
if x > 0 {
g()
}
}
Update #19348
Change-Id: Ifb1ea0dd1db216c3fd5c453c31c3355561fe406f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147361
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Dead-code eliminating labels is tricky because there might
be gotos that can still reach them.
Bug probably introduced with CL 91056
Fixes#28616
Change-Id: I6680465134e3486dcb658896f5172606cc51b104
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147817
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
This change re-introduces (temporarily) a work-around for recursive
alias type declarations, originally in https://golang.org/cl/35831/
(intended as fix for #18640). The work-around was removed later
for a more comprehensive cycle detection check. That check
contained a subtle error which made the code appear to work,
while in fact creating incorrect types internally. See #25838
for details.
By re-introducing the original work-around, we eliminate problems
with many simple recursive type declarations involving aliases;
specifically cases such as #27232 and #27267. However, the more
general problem remains.
This CL also fixes the subtle error (incorrect variable use when
analyzing a type cycle) mentioned above and now issues a fatal
error with a reference to the relevant issue (rather than crashing
later during the compilation). While not great, this is better
than the current status. The long-term solution will need to
address these cycles (see #25838).
As a consequence, several old test cases are not accepted anymore
by the compiler since they happened to work accidentally only.
This CL disables parts or all code of those test cases. The issues
are: #18640, #23823, and #24939.
One of the new test cases (fixedbugs/issue27232.go) exposed a
go/types issue. The test case is excluded from the go/types test
suite and an issue was filed (#28576).
Updates #18640.
Updates #23823.
Updates #24939.
Updates #25838.
Updates #28576.
Fixes#27232.
Fixes#27267.
Change-Id: I6c2d10da98bfc6f4f445c755fcaab17fc7b214c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147286
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This reverts commit 9ce87a63b9.
The fix addresses the specific test case, but not the general
problem.
Updates #24755.
Change-Id: I0ba8463b41b099b1ebf49759f88a423b40f70d58
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145617
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This way, once the constant declarations are typechecked, all named
types are fully typechecked and have all of their methods added.
Usually this isn't important, as methods and interfaces cannot be used
in constant declarations. However, it can lead to confusing and
incorrect errors, such as:
$ cat f.go
package p
type I interface{ F() }
type T struct{}
const _ = I(T{})
func (T) F() {}
$ go build f.go
./f.go:6:12: cannot convert T literal (type T) to type I:
T does not implement I (missing F method)
The error is clearly wrong, as T does have an F method. If we ensure
that all funcs are typechecked before all constant declarations, we get
the correct error:
$ go build f2.go
# command-line-arguments
./f.go:6:7: const initializer I(T literal) is not a constant
Fixes#24755.
Change-Id: I182b60397b9cac521d9a9ffadb11b42fd42e42fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/115096
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
CL 114797 reworked how arguments get written to the stack.
Some type conversions got lost in the process. Restore them.
Fixes#28390
Updates #28430
Change-Id: Ia0d37428d7d615c865500bbd1a7a4167554ee34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144598
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If a field and method have the same name, mark the respective struct field
so that we don't report follow-on errors when the field/method is accessed.
Per suggestion of @mdempsky.
Fixes#28268.
Change-Id: Ia1ca4cdfe9bacd3739d1fd7ca5e014ca094245ee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144259
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The second and subsequent return values from f() need to be
converted to the element type of the first return value from f()
(which must be a slice).
Fixes#22327
Change-Id: I5c0a424812c82c1b95b6d124c5626cfc4408bdb6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142718
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
As of https://golang.org/cl/43456 gccgo now gives a better error
message for this test.
Before:
fixedbugs/issue5089.go:13:1: error: redefinition of ‘bufio.Buffered’: receiver name changed
func (b *bufio.Reader) Buffered() int { // ERROR "non-local|redefinition"
^
fixedbugs/issue5089.go:11:13: note: previous definition of ‘bufio.Buffered’ was here
import "bufio" // GCCGO_ERROR "previous"
^
Now:
fixedbugs/issue5089.go:13:7: error: may not define methods on non-local type
func (b *bufio.Reader) Buffered() int { // ERROR "non-local|redefinition"
^
Change-Id: I4112ca8d91336f6369f780c1d45b8915b5e8e235
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/130955
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Building with gccgo failed with an undefined symbol error from an
unnecessary hash function.
Updates #19773
Change-Id: Ic78bf1b086ff5ee26d464089c0e14987d3fe8b02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/130956
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Ensure that label redefinition error column numbers
print the actual start of the label instead of the
position of the label's delimiting token ":".
For example, given this program:
package main
func main() {
foo:
foo:
foo:
foo :
}
* Before:
main.go:5:13: label foo defined and not used
main.go:6:7: label foo already defined at main.go:5:13
main.go:7:4: label foo already defined at main.go:5:13
main.go:8:16: label foo already defined at main.go:5:13
* After:
main.go:5:13: label foo defined and not used
main.go:6:4: label foo already defined at main.go:5:13
main.go:7:1: label foo already defined at main.go:5:13
main.go:8:1: label foo already defined at main.go:5:13
Fixes#26411
Change-Id: I8eb874b97fdc8862547176d57ac2fa0f075f2367
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/124595
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
In golang.org/cl/75310, the compiler's typechecker was changed so that
map key types were validated at a later stage, to make sure that all the
necessary type information was present.
This still worked for map type declarations, but caused a regression for
top-level map variable declarations. These now caused a fatal panic
instead of a typechecking error.
The cause was that checkMapKeys was run too early, before all
typechecking was done. In particular, top-level map variable
declarations are typechecked as external declarations, much later than
where checkMapKeys was run.
Add a test case for both exported and unexported top-level map
declarations, and add a second call to checkMapKeys at the actual end of
typechecking. Simply moving the one call isn't a good solution either;
the comments expand on that.
Fixes#28058.
Change-Id: Ia5febb01a1d877447cf66ba44fb49a7e0f4f18a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/140417
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
When we pass these types by reference, we usually have to allocate
temporaries on the stack, initialize them, then pass their address
to the conversion functions. It's simpler to pass these types
directly by value.
This particularly applies to conversions needed for fmt.Printf
(to interface{} for constructing a [...]interface{}).
func f(a, b, c string) {
fmt.Printf("%s %s\n", a, b)
fmt.Printf("%s %s\n", b, c)
}
This function's stack frame shrinks from 200 to 136 bytes, and
its code shrinks from 535 to 453 bytes.
The go binary shrinks 0.3%.
Update #24286
Aside: for this function f, we don't really need to allocate
temporaries for the convT2E function. We could use the address
of a, b, and c directly. That might get similar (or maybe better?)
improvements. I investigated a bit, but it seemed complicated
to do it safely. This change was much easier.
Change-Id: I78cbe51b501fb41e1e324ce4203f0de56a1db82d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/135377
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This was missed as part of adding a top-level VARDEF
for stack tracing (CL 134156).
Fixes#28055
Change-Id: Id14748dfccb119197d788867d2ec6a3b3c9835cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/140304
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
When a function triggers a signal (like a segfault which translates to
a nil pointer exception) during execution, a sigpanic handler is just
below it on the stack. The function itself did not stop at a
safepoint, so we have to figure out what safepoint we should use to
scan its stack frame.
Previously we used the site of the most recent defer to get the live
variables at the signal site. That answer is not quite correct, as
explained in #27518. Instead, use the site of a deferreturn call.
It has all the right variables marked as live (no args, all the return
values, except those that escape to the heap, in which case the
corresponding PAUTOHEAP variables will be live instead).
This CL requires stack objects, so that all the local variables
and args referenced by the deferred closures keep the right variables alive.
Fixes#27518
Change-Id: Id45d8a8666759986c203181090b962e2981e48ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/134637
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The previous CL introduced stack objects. This CL removes the old
ambiguously live liveness analysis. After this CL we're relying
on stack objects exclusively.
Update a bunch of liveness tests to reflect the new world.
Fixes#22350
Change-Id: I739b26e015882231011ce6bc1a7f426049e59f31
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/134156
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
In some optimization rules the type of generated OffPtr was
incorrectly set to the type of the pointee, instead of the
pointer. When the OffPtr value is spilled, this may generate
a spill of the wrong type, e.g. a floating point spill of an
integer (pointer) value. On Wasm, this leads to invalid
bytecode.
Fixes#27961.
Change-Id: I5d464847eb900ed90794105c0013a1a7330756cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/139257
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
During a call to a reflect-generated function or method (via
makeFuncStub or methodValueCall), when should we scan the return
values?
When we're starting a reflect call, the space on the stack for the
return values is not initialized yet, as it contains whatever junk was
on the stack of the caller at the time. The return space must not be
scanned during a GC.
When we're finishing a reflect call, the return values are
initialized, and must be scanned during a GC to make sure that any
pointers in the return values are found and their referents retained.
When the GC stack walk comes across a reflect call in progress on the
stack, it needs to know whether to scan the results or not. It doesn't
know the progress of the reflect call, so it can't decide by
itself. The reflect package needs to tell it.
This CL adds another slot in the frame of makeFuncStub and
methodValueCall so we can put a boolean in there which tells the
runtime whether to scan the results or not.
This CL also adds the args length to reflectMethodValue so the
runtime can restrict its scanning to only the args section (not the
results) if the reflect package says the results aren't ready yet.
Do a delicate dance in the reflect package to set the "results are
valid" bit. We need to make sure we set the bit only after we've
copied the results back to the stack. But we must set the bit before
we drop reflect's copy of the results. Otherwise, we might have a
state where (temporarily) no one has a live copy of the results.
That's the state we were observing in issue #27695 before this CL.
The bitmap used by the runtime currently contains only the args.
(Actually, it contains all the bits, but the size is set so we use
only the args portion.) This is safe for early in a reflect call, but
unsafe late in a reflect call. The test issue27695.go demonstrates
this unsafety. We change the bitmap to always include both args
and results, and decide at runtime which portion to use.
issue27695.go only has a test for method calls. Function calls were ok
because there wasn't a safepoint between when reflect dropped its copy
of the return values and when the caller is resumed. This may change
when we introduce safepoints everywhere.
This truncate-to-only-the-args was part of CL 9888 (in 2015). That
part of the CL fixed the problem demonstrated in issue27695b.go but
introduced the problem demonstrated in issue27695.go.
TODO, in another CL: simplify FuncLayout and its test. stack return
value is now identical to frametype.ptrdata + frametype.gcdata.
Fixes#27695
Change-Id: I2d49b34e34a82c6328b34f02610587a291b25c5f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/137440
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Also includes a small tweak to test/run.go to allow package names
with Unicode letters (as opposed to just ASCII chars).
Updates #27836
Change-Id: Idbf0bdea24174808cddcb69974dab820eb13e521
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/138075
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Show a more specifc error message in the form of "%d variables but %v
returns %d values" if an assignment mismatch occurs with a function
or method call on the right.
Fixes#27595
Change-Id: Ibc97d070662b08f150ac22d686059cf224e012ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/135575
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Adds a new build tag "gcflags_noopt" that can be used in test/*.go
tests.
Fixes#27833
Change-Id: I4ea0ccd9e9e58c4639de18645fec81eb24a3a929
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/136898
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
&^ and << have equal precedence. Add some parentheses to make sure
we shift before we andnot.
Fixes#27829
Change-Id: Iba8576201f0f7c52bf9795aaa75d15d8f9a76811
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/136899
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
See the change and comment in typecheck.go for a detailed explanation.
Fixes#26855.
Change-Id: I7867f948490fc0873b1bd849048cda6acbc36e76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/136395
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
That optimization is not valid if x == -0.
The test is a bit tricky because 0 == -0. We distinguish
0 from -0 with 1/0 == inf, 1/-0 == -inf.
This has been a bug since CL 24790 in Go 1.8. Probably doesn't
warrant a backport.
Fixes#27718
Note: the optimization x-0 -> x is actually valid.
But it's probably best to take it out, so as to not confuse readers.
Change-Id: I99f16a93b45f7406ec8053c2dc759a13eba035fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/135701
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Added some more cases that should be guarded against regression.
Change-Id: I9f1dda2fd0be9b6e167ef1cc018fc8cce55c066c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/134017
Run-TryBot: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has
made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work,
we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more
efficient.
With this change, it's possible to use
NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired
stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can
prove the created slice to be non-escaping.
New implementation key points:
- Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before
- You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes
- The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly
- Empty writes don't cause allocations
Buffer benchmarks from bytes package:
name old time/op new time/op delta
ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10)
WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old speed new speed delta
ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10)
WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal)
WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal)
BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc):
HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue.
Updates #7921
Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing implementation causes a compiler panic if a function parameter shadows a built-in function, and then calling that shadowed name.
Fixes#27356
Change-Id: I1ffb6dc01e63c7f499e5f6f75f77ce2318f35bcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/132876
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Makes the error message more consistent between OAS and OAS2.
Fixes#26616.
Change-Id: I07ab46c5ef8a37efb2cb557632697f5d1bf789f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131280
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Fence-post implications of the form "x-1 >= w && x > min ⇒ x > w"
were not correctly handling unsigned domain, by always checking signed
limits.
This bug was uncovered once we taught prove that len(x) is always
>= 0 in the signed domain.
In the code being miscompiled (s[len(s)-1]), prove checks
whether len(s)-1 >= len(s) in the unsigned domain; if it proves
that this is always false, it can remove the bound check.
Notice that len(s)-1 >= len(s) can be true for len(s) = 0 because
of the wrap-around, so this is something prove should not be
able to deduce.
But because of the bug, the gate condition for the fence-post
implication was len(s) > MinInt64 instead of len(s) > 0; that
condition would be good in the signed domain but not in the
unsigned domain. And since in CL105635 we taught prove that
len(s) >= 0, the condition incorrectly triggered
(len(s) >= 0 > MinInt64) and things were going downfall.
Fixes#27251Fixes#27289
Change-Id: I3dbcb1955ac5a66a0dcbee500f41e8d219409be5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/132495
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Nil check is special in that it has no use but we must keep it.
Count it as a use of the auto.
Fixes#27278.
Change-Id: I857c3d0db2ebdca1bc342b4993c0dac5c01e067f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131955
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In the compiler frontend, walkinrange indiscriminately calls Int64()
on const CTINT nodes, even though Int64's return value is undefined
for anything over 2⁶³ (in practise, it'll return a negative number).
This causes the introduction of bad constants during rewrites of
unsigned expressions, which make the compiler reject valid Go
programs.
This change introduces a preliminary check that Int64() is safe to
call on the consts on hand. If it isn't, walkinrange exits without
doing any rewrite.
Fixes#27143
Change-Id: I2017073cae65468a521ff3262d4ea8ab0d7098d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/130735
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Consolidate decision about whether -race and -msan options are
supported in cmd/internal/sys. Use consolidated functions in
cmd/compile and cmd/go. Use a copy of them in cmd/dist; cmd/dist can't
import cmd/internal/sys because Go 1.4 doesn't have it.
Fixes#24315
Change-Id: I9cecaed4895eb1a2a49379b4848db40de66d32a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121816
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Gccgo produced incorrect order of evaluation for expressions
involving &&, || subexpressions. The fix is CL 125299.
Updates #26495.
Change-Id: I18d873281709f3160b3e09f0b2e46f5c120e1cab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125301
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Code fix was in CL 122556. This is a corresponding test case.
Fixes#26426
Change-Id: Ib8769f367aed8bead029da0a8d2ddccee1d1dccb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124535
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If one tries to use promoted fields in a struct literal, the compiler
errors correctly. However, if the embedded fields are of struct pointer
type, the field.Type.Sym.Name expression below panics.
This is because field.Type.Sym is nil in that case. We can simply use
field.Sym.Name in this piece of code though, as it only concerns
embedded fields, in which case what we are after is the field name.
Added a test mirroring fixedbugs/issue23609.go, but with pointer types.
Fixes#26416.
Change-Id: Ia46ce62995c9e1653f315accb99d592aff2f285e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124395
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The arm64 backend generates "TST" for "if uint32(a)&uint32(b) == 0",
which should be "TSTW".
fixes#26438
Change-Id: I7d64c30e3a840b43486bcd10eea2e3e75aaa4857
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124637
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
