As discussed in
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-dev/Na9XE6mcQyY/zbeBI7R-vnoJ
Here is a static copy of the go/parser benchmark. I ended up using
fancy encodings because the original parser.go had a number of `s
scattered throughout which made it hard to embed the source directly.
Curiously on my laptop this benchmark always scores roughly 10% higher
than the standalone benchmark. This may be down to the generation of
the fasta data set triggering the cpu governor to raise the cpu speed.
However the benchmark is consistent with itself across multiple runs.
R=golang-dev, minux.ma, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6305055
As discussed on golang-dev, reduce the size of the fasta
dataset to make it possible to run the go1 benchmarks on
small ARM systems.
Also, remove the 25m suffix from fasta data and Revcomp.
linux/arm: pandaboard OMAP4
BenchmarkBinaryTree17 1 70892426000 ns/op
BenchmarkFannkuch11 1 35712066000 ns/op
BenchmarkGobDecode 10 137146000 ns/op 5.60 MB/s
BenchmarkGobEncode 50 64953000 ns/op 11.82 MB/s
BenchmarkGzip 1 5675690000 ns/op 3.42 MB/s
BenchmarkGunzip 1 1207001000 ns/op 16.08 MB/s
BenchmarkJSONEncode 5 860424800 ns/op 2.26 MB/s
BenchmarkJSONDecode 1 3321839000 ns/op 0.58 MB/s
BenchmarkMandelbrot200 50 45893560 ns/op
BenchmarkRevcomp 10 135220300 ns/op 18.80 MB/s
BenchmarkTemplate 1 6385681000 ns/op 0.30 MB/s
R=rsc, minux.ma, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6278048
We can't depend on init() order, and certainly we don't want to
register all future benchmarks that use jsonbytes or jsondata to init()
in json_test.go, so we use a more general solution: make generation of
jsonbytes and jsondata their own function so that the compiler will take
care of the order.
R=golang-dev, dave, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6282046
Most significant in mandelbrot, from avoiding MOVSD between registers,
but there are others.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6258063
Surprise! The C code is using floating point values for its counters.
Its off the critical path, but the Go code and C code are supposed to
be as similar as possible to make comparisons meaningful.
It doesn't have a significant effect.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6260058
Moving panic out of line speeds up fannkuch almost a factor of two.
Changes to bitwhacking code affect mandelbrot badly.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz, rsc, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6258056
Unexports runtime.MemStats and rename MemStatsType to MemStats.
The new accessor requires passing a pointer to a user-allocated
MemStats structure.
Fixes#2572.
R=bradfitz, rsc, bradfitz, gustavo
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/5616072
Also delete gotest, since it's messy to fix and slated for deletion anyway.
A couple of things outside src can't be tested any more. "go test" will be
fixed and these tests will be re-enabled. They're noisy for now.
Fixes#284.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5598049
I have included a few important microbenchmarks,
but the overall intent is to have mostly end-to-end
benchmarks timing real world operations.
The jsondata.go file is a summary of agl's
activity in various open source repositories.
It gets used as test data for many of the benchmarks.
Everything links into one binary (even the test data)
so that it is easy to run the benchmarks on many
computers: there is just one file to copy around.
R=golang-dev, r, bradfitz, adg, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5484071
Some tests are significantly faster (50%), a few are slower (up to 30%).
Fannkuch is confusing: parallel code is a little slower for gc, non-parallel and all gccgo runs are faster.
R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4830058
Interesting comparisons between old and new machine,
and relationship between gccgo and gc.
R=golang-dev, rsc1
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4430045
- Skip the gccgo tests if we don't have it
- Add -lm so nbody.c will compile
- Pass 2098 to the meteor test (cf. the shootout site)
R=rsc, r, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3619042
Changed all uses of bytes.Add (aside from those testing bytes.Add) to append(a, b...).
Also ran "gofmt -s" and made use of copy([]byte, string) in the fasta benchmark.
R=golang-dev, r, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3302042
I tried adding a Scale method to big.Int and it didn't make any noticeable
difference, so I'm removing my TODO.
Also got rid of a few obvious allocations that I missed earlier for a modest
improvement (~5%).
R=golang-dev, gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/2711043
- renamed Len -> BitLen, simplified implementation
- renamed old Div, Mod, DivMod -> Que, Rem, QuoRem
- implemented Div, Mod, DivMod (Euclidian definition, more
useful in a mathematical context)
- fixed a bug in Exp (-0 was possible)
- added extra tests to check normalized results everywhere
- uniformly set Int.neg flag at the end of computations
- minor cosmetic cleanups
- ran all tests
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/1091041
- fixed a couple of bugs in the process
(shift right was incorrect for negative numbers)
- added more tests and made some tests more robust
- changed pidigits back to using shifts to multiply
by 2 instead of add
This improves pidigit -s -n 10000 by approx. 5%:
user 0m6.496s (old)
user 0m6.156s (new)
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/963044
