CL 329571 fold the checking has type params logic, but did not realize
that the instance in typIdx can be folded, too.
Change-Id: I4682af3779535af6a6e843972cada12ba1bae6ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330389
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The previous code for walking the syntax AST to find declarations
needed to know whether a declaration appeared within block scope, but
syntax.Crawl (née syntax.Walk) made that somewhat awkward.
This CL simplifies it a little, taking advantage of syntax.Walk's
support for keeping per-subtree state.
Change-Id: I03c7da8c44bec40f88e983852dc6bbab7e6ac13c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330549
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
The helper function claims that dialing a closed port should be
"nearly instantaneous", but that is empirically not the case on
OpenBSD or Windows. The tests do not appear to be particularly
sensitive to the exact upper bound otherwise, so let's just
remove the arbitrary latency assumption.
Fixes#46884
Change-Id: If00c9fdc3063da6aaf60d365d4a2ee2c94dc6df1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330250
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixes#46883
Updates CL 267017
Change-Id: I15c307bfb0aaa2877a148d32527681f79df1a650
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330289
Reviewed-by: Kevin Burke <kev@inburke.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
When we are looking for a dependency cycle involving a specific
package, we need to keep track of visited packages in order to avoid
repeatedly traversing a cycle that does not involve that package.
If we're keeping track of all visited packages anyway, we're already
spending O(N) memory on the traversal, so we may as well use
breadth-first search. That not only keeps the bookkeeping simple, but
also guarantees that we will find a shortest path (rather than a
completely arbitrary one).
Fixes#45863
Change-Id: I810c7337857e42dcb83630abbdea75021554be45
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330430
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
The real net code uses subtle heuristics to transform a domain name
to its absolute form. Since lookupPTR isn't checking that
transformation specifically, it should use the real code instead of
using a different heuristic.
Fixes#46882
Change-Id: I503357e0f62059c37c359cd54b44d343c7d5ab2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330249
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Trust: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The test successfully runs on currently supported versions (6.8 and
6.9) of openbsd.
Fixes#25877
Change-Id: I2694f08c5596b486453c2ac829f17b8bc455f828
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329732
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
- Fix handling of method expressions with embedded fields. Fix an
incorrect lookup for method expressions, which have only the
top-level type (and don't have DOT operations for the embedded
fields). Add the embedded field dot operations into the closure.
- Don't need a dictionary and so don't build a closure if the last
embedded field reached in a method expression is an interface value.
- Fix methodWrapper() to use the computed 'dot' node in the
generic-only part of the code.
- For a method expression, don't create a generic wrapper if the last
embedded field reached before the method lookup is an interface.
Copied cmd/compile/internal/types2/testdata/fixedbugs/issue44688.go2 to
test/typeparam/issue44688.go, made it fully runnable (rather than just
for compilation), and added a bunch more tests.
Change-Id: I90c1aa569e1c7272e986c9d2ae683e553c3a38a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329550
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL adds go/ast's Visitor, Walk, and Inspect functions to package
syntax. Having functions with the same API and semantics as their
go/ast counterparts reduces the mental load of context switching
between go/ast and syntax.
It also renames the existing Walk function into Crawl, and marks it as
a deprecated wrapper around Inspect. (I named it "Crawl" because it's
less functional than "Walk"... get it??)
There aren't that many callers to Crawl, so we can probably remove it
in the future. But it doesn't seem pressing, and I'm more concerned
about the risk of forgetting to invert a bool condition somewhere.
Change-Id: Ib2fb275873a1d1a730249c9cb584864cb6ec370e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330429
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
When wrapping a go/defer statement like:
go f(g(), "x", 42)
we were wrapping it like:
_0, _1, _2, _3 := f, g(), "x", 42
go func() { _0(_1, _2, _3) }()
This is simple and general (and often necessary), but suboptimal in
some cases, such as this. Instead of evaluating the constant arguments
at the go/defer statement, and storing them into the closure context,
we can just keep them in the wrapped call expression.
This CL changes the code to instead generate (assuming f is a declared
function, not a function-typed variable):
_0 := g()
go func() { f(_0, "x", 42) }()
Change-Id: I2bdd4951e7ee93363e1656ecf9b5bd69a121c38a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330332
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CL extends escape analysis to analyze function calls using method
expressions the same as it would a normal method call. That is, it now
analyzes "T.M(recv, args...)" the same as "recv.M(args...)".
This is useful because it means the frontend can eventually stop
supporting both function calls and method calls. We can simply desugar
method calls into function calls, like we already do in the backend to
simplify SSA construction.
Change-Id: I9cd5ec0d534cbcd9860f0014c86e4ae416920c26
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330331
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CL moves two bits of related code from order.go to escape
analysis:
1. The recognition of "unsafe uintptr" arguments passed to
syscall-like functions.
2. The wrapping of go/defer function calls in parameter-free function
literals.
As with previous CLs, it would be nice to push this logic even further
forward, but for now escape analysis seems most pragmatic.
A couple side benefits:
1. It allows getting rid of the uintptrEscapesHack kludge.
2. When inserting wrappers, we can move some expressions into the
wrapper and escape analyze them better. For example, the test
expectation changes are all due to slice literals in go/defer calls
where the slice is now constructed at the call site, and can now be
stack allocated.
Change-Id: I73679bcad7fa8d61d2fc52d4cea0dc5ff0de8c0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330330
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Currently ORECOVER is a single operation that both (1) calculates
the (logical) caller frame pointer and (2) calls runtime.gorecover.
This is normally fine, but it's inconvenient for regabi, which wants
to wrap "defer recover()" into "defer func() { recover() }" and
needs (1) and (2) to happen at different times.
The current solution is to apply walkRecover early to split it into
the two steps, but calling it during order is a minor layering
violation. It works well today because the order and walk phases are
closely related anyway and walkRecover is relatively simple, but it
won't work for go/defer wrapping earlier into the frontend.
This CL adds a new, lower-level ORECOVERFP primitive, which represents
just part (2); and OGETCALLER{PC,SP} primitives, which provide a way
to compute (1) in the frontend too.
OGETCALLERPC isn't needed/used today, but it seems worth including for
completeness. Maybe it will be useful at some point for intrinsifying
runtime.getcaller{pc,sp}, like we already do for runtime.getg.
Change-Id: Iaa8ae51e09306c45c147b6759a5b7c24dcc317ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330192
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CLs adds new frontend ops that will be used in the next CL. Split
out separately so generated code is less distracting in the main CL.
Change-Id: I66125e0ec2217bfa05f7b0ea0bc99ada13f563f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330191
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
The current go/defer wrapping code goes to some length to clear
ClosureCalled when a function call will end up not being called
directly, and so it will need to use the context register.
But we already have a flag to indicate we need to use the context
register: Needctxt. The real issue here is just that buildssa was
using fn.ClosureCalled instead of fn.Needctxt.
Change-Id: Ic9f5f23b66eb467fc61fa84eacb45d46c54133d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330329
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CL is a prep refactoring for an upcoming CL to move go/defer
wrapping into escape analysis. That CL is unfortunately unavoidably
complex and subtle, so this CL takes care of some more mundane
refactoring details.
Change-Id: Ifbefe1d522a8d57066646be09536437f42e7082c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330251
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This flag is only needed to prevent the directClosureCall optimization
in walkCall, when called for walkGoDefer. But walkGoDefer don't need
to call walkCall: at this point in the compile, the call expression
isn't a real call anymore.
Instead, we just need to walkExpr on the function expression.
Change-Id: I8a5176cfe1bff53700cbd21ed1b479ebd9a839ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330271
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
order already takes care of wrapping all go/defer function calls, so
there's no need for walk to duplicate that logic: it's never going to
be used.
Change-Id: I54e545404e52ab8f9d60151d1bd2aff4b9bd8b72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330270
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL makes OCHECKNIL typecheckable. Simplifies IR construction code
slightly, and gives one convenient place to check for misuse.
Change-Id: I280b8e47eddcac12947a41d6f911b25bc12a66bf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330194
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
CaptureName currently does a few things: checks if a variable needs to
be captured at all; checks if the variable has already been captured;
and creates and saves a new variable. This full suite of functionality
is useful for noder and irgen, but unified IR and other backend code
only has a need for the last feature.
This CL refactors CaptureName a little bit and extracts out
NewClosureVar as a function usable for callers that don't need the
extra features of CaptureName.
Change-Id: I8a67c6375e44babe53344bf78e335535c57f9607
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330193
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
CL 325369 improved this logic in types2. Port this improvement back to
go/types.
Change-Id: I5f859cbffd88bb3db09a81c2389269f7bd0869f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330069
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Remove logic related to guarding against allowing type parameters from
cmd/gofmt. At this point, it was only restricting tests.
Change-Id: Idd198389aaa422636d61af547a37be49f3be6c97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329931
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The build.Context ToolTags value is set based on the set of enabled
experiments, which in turn depends on GOARCH. Before this CL the set
of experiments was being set based on GOARCH in the environment.
That is normally fine, but fails with cmd/go when somebody has run
"go env -w GOARCH=val"; in that case cmd/go changes its GOARCH value
after initialization. The new GOARCH value was affect the set of
enabled experiments, which can affect the ToolTags value. With this
CL, we update ToolTags in cmd/go based on the GOARCH value it is using.
This is a pretty ugly fix. We should do something cleaner for 1.18.
Fixes#46815
Change-Id: Ie9416781a168248813c3da8afdc257acdd3fef7e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329930
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Add unsafe.Add and unsafe.Slice to the list of built-in functions
which are not permitted in statement context. The compiler and
type checker already enforce this restriction, this just fixes
a documentation oversight.
For #19367.
For #40481.
Change-Id: Iabc63a8db048eaf40a5f5b5573fdf00b79d54119
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329925
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
When type checking t[_], where t is a type name, it was possible to leak
an error message related to generics. Fix this by guarding on
typeparams.Enabled.
In order to test this fix, we need to be able to run the new go/types
test only if type parameters are disabled. Introduce the .go1 test data
suffix (similar to .go2) to control this behavior.
Originally found via fuzzing, though the test case was manually
simplified.
Updates #46404
Change-Id: Ib1e2c27cf974c2a5ca5b9d6d01b84a30ba4d583b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329793
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This CL reorganizes the code from package escape into multiple files,
so the relationships between bits of code are hopefully easier to
follow. Besides moving code around and adding necessary
copyright/import declarations, no code is touched at all.
Change-Id: Iddd396c3a140f4eb1a7a6266d92a4098118b575b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329989
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CL removes the special escape analysis tags added to support
//go:uintptrescapes and calls to external functions. Instead, these
are kept as function pragmas.
This CL by itself isn't very interesting, but I expect will help with
subsequent cleanups I have planned here.
Change-Id: Ifb960289a27e0a6295ce2d2f5ec233cac590522b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329969
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Originally, overloading -d=inlfuncswithclosures=0 to enable quirks
mode was convenient because toolstash -cmp doesn't provide a way to
pass different gcflags to the installed vs stashed toolchains. Prior
to unified IR being merged, the stashed toolchain wouldn't know about
or accept any unified-specific flags.
However, this concern is no longer applicable since unified IR has
been merged, and the TestUnifiedCompare test can easily specify
different flag sets for the baseline and experiment build configs.
This CL adds a new -d=unifiedquirks flag to enable quirks mode, so
that it's possible to test unified IR with -d=inlfuncswithclosures=0
without also affecting a bunch of other compilation details.
Change-Id: Id1932f332822622aa8617278e82ec6d1a53b1b46
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329733
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
This documentation remained from the original dev.typeparams merge. This
flag no longer exists.
Change-Id: Ic9a82071c512614dc1382780d69ef13253fca21d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329792
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
To be consistent with Go 1.16, and to preserve as much information in
the AST as possible, parse an ast.IndexExpr with BadExpr Index for the
invalid expression a[].
A go/types test had to be adjusted to account for an additional error
resulting from this change.
We don't have a lot of test coverage for parser error recovery, so
rather than write an ad-hoc test for this issue, add a new go/types test
that checks that the indexed operand is used.
Updates #46403
Change-Id: I21e6ff4179746aaa50e530d4091fded450e69824
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329791
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
For #46366
Change-Id: I8417e6e4dbb8cb56ff7afc16893a01b7bb938217
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329529
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
CL 328770 should be sufficient to fix the specific failure in the
report, but when attempting to reproduce it I noticed a related
failure mode, triggered by the environment variables set in
src/run.bash.
The failure mode is currently masked on the Go project builders due to
the lack of any 'longtest' builder running as a non-root user
(#10719).
It is also masked from Go contributors running 'run.bash' locally
because 'run.bash' does not actually run all of the tests unless
GO_TEST_SHORT=0 is set in the environment (#29266, #46054).
Fixes#46695
Change-Id: I272c09dae462734590dce59b3d3c5b6d3f733c92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/328771
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TestAllDependencies is attempting to check that the modules in GOROOT
satisfy certain properties; it should not modify those modules itself.
The “quick” part of the test checks that vendored packages are present
and complete, without constructing a parallel GOROOT. It shouldn't
resolve new dependencies or change formatting in any way.
The longer version of the test already constructs a parallel GOROOT
and tidies the modules within it. That part of the test will flag any
modifications needed to the go.mod and go.sum files, without modifying
the original GOROOT.
From what I can tell, the failure mode in #46695 is caused by running
the test on a module rooted in $GOROOT proper. There is no such module
in the mainline Go repo, but it may have been introduced in the fork
and could also be introduced by stray edits in contributor CLs. It
should be diagnosed clearly.
For #46695
Change-Id: I62b90ccbd54cb3e3b413017021c952a7b1d455e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/328770
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Change-Id: I2d2c02eec4ac6eca218fa5334d32650c1620692c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329689
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.org>
CL 308611 optimized parseIdentifier for ASCII, but inadvertently skipped
error handling for 0 bytes. Don't take the optimized path when
encountering 0.
Fixes#46855
Change-Id: Ic584e077eb74c012611fefa20eb71ca09c81b3c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329790
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The issue go#46783 correctly diagnosed the context timeout
caused an intermittent failure when the context was canceled
prior to the BeginTx call. However due to the asynchronous nature
of canceling a Tx through a context on fast systems, the tx.Prepare
also succeeded. On slower systems or if a time.Sleep was inserted
between the BeginTx and Prepare, the Prepare would fail.
Resolve this by moving the context cancel after the Prepare.
This will still trigger the deadlock which I tested locally.
In addition, I interspersed multiple time.Sleep calls and the
test still functioned.
Fixes#46852
Change-Id: I9cbf90d3c12b2555493a37799738772b615ae39d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329830
Run-TryBot: Daniel Theophanes <kardianos@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
This patch reinstates a fix for PowerPC with regard to making VDSO calls
while receiving a signal, and subsequently crashing. The crash happens
because certain VDSO calls can modify the r30 register, which is where g
is stored. This change was reverted for PowerPC because r30 is supposed
to be a non-volatile register. This is true, but that only makes a
guarantee across function calls, but not "within" a function call. This
patch was seemingly fine before because the Linux kernel still had hand
rolled assembly VDSO function calls, however with a recent change to C
function calls it seems the compiler used can generate instructions
which temporarily clobber r30. This means that when we receive a signal
during one of these calls the value of r30 will not be the g as the
runtime expects, causing a segfault.
You can see from this assembly dump how the register is clobbered during
the call:
(the following is from a 5.13rc2 kernel)
```
Dump of assembler code for function __cvdso_clock_gettime_data:
0x00007ffff7ff0700 <+0>: cmplwi r4,15
0x00007ffff7ff0704 <+4>: bgt 0x7ffff7ff07f0 <__cvdso_clock_gettime_data+240>
0x00007ffff7ff0708 <+8>: li r9,1
0x00007ffff7ff070c <+12>: slw r9,r9,r4
0x00007ffff7ff0710 <+16>: andi. r10,r9,2179
0x00007ffff7ff0714 <+20>: beq 0x7ffff7ff0810 <__cvdso_clock_gettime_data+272>
0x00007ffff7ff0718 <+24>: rldicr r10,r4,4,59
0x00007ffff7ff071c <+28>: lis r9,32767
0x00007ffff7ff0720 <+32>: std r30,-16(r1)
0x00007ffff7ff0724 <+36>: std r31,-8(r1)
0x00007ffff7ff0728 <+40>: add r6,r3,r10
0x00007ffff7ff072c <+44>: ori r4,r9,65535
0x00007ffff7ff0730 <+48>: lwz r8,0(r3)
0x00007ffff7ff0734 <+52>: andi. r9,r8,1
0x00007ffff7ff0738 <+56>: bne 0x7ffff7ff07d0 <__cvdso_clock_gettime_data+208>
0x00007ffff7ff073c <+60>: lwsync
0x00007ffff7ff0740 <+64>: mftb r30 <---- RIGHT HERE
=> 0x00007ffff7ff0744 <+68>: ld r12,40(r6)
```
What I believe is happening is that the kernel changed the PowerPC VDSO
calls to use standard C calls instead of using hand rolled assembly. The
hand rolled assembly calls never touched r30, so this change was safe to
roll back. That does not seem to be the case anymore as on the 5.13rc2
kernel the compiler *is* generating assembly which modifies r30, making
this change again unsafe and causing a crash when the program receives a
signal during these calls (which will happen often due to async
preempt). This change happened here:
https://lwn.net/ml/linux-kernel/235e5571959cfa89ced081d7e838ed5ff38447d2.1601365870.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/.
I realize this was reverted due to unexplained hangs in PowerPC
builders, but I think we should reinstate this change and investigate
those issues separately:
f4ca3c1e0aFixes#46803
Change-Id: Ib18d7bbfc80a1a9cb558f0098878d41081324b52
GitHub-Last-Rev: c3002bcfca
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#46767
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/328110
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Apparently, TestMorestack is still flaky on darwin/arm64 builder
after CL 307730. Let it spend more time in copying the stack.
With this CL, on my Apple M1 machine it passes reliably in short
mode for 1000 runs, and reliably gets 250+ samples in the 5-second
interval in long mode.
May fix#46755.
Change-Id: I07b36c1cf63ad35f7820e1f8e837e29376a37b2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329869
Trust: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Documents the mode added in CL 306149 to skip object resolution.
Fixes#46298
Change-Id: I6a14aaa00790f9f7e4e4ba17033355f5e878d74b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329009
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
CL 280634 remove Sym.Importdef, so ipkg in importsym is not used
anymore. So we can remove it from importsym and all other import*
functions, which just call importsym internally.
Change-Id: I15b9d11c4445dbe40982f7ff2a33a2116705e790
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329573
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
So making it less verbose and clearer to the reader what that check means.
Change-Id: I41587aab399e63600356c5cecec64978048bed36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329571
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
We've observed some occasional os-arch specific timeouts
in signal.TestSignalTrace(). While the main purpose of a
short timeout is to ensure the passing tests complete
quickly, the unexpected failure path can tolerate waiting
longer (the test is not intended to test how slow or
overloaded the OS is at the time it is run).
Fixes#46736
Change-Id: Ib392fc6ce485a919612784ca88ed76c30f4898e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/329502
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Trust: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
