Most of the test cases in the test directory use the new go:build syntax
already. Convert the rest. In general, try to place the build constraint
line below the test directive comment in more places.
For #41184.
For #60268.
Change-Id: I11c41a0642a8a26dc2eda1406da908645bbc005b
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-386-longtest,gotip-linux-amd64-longtest,gotip-windows-amd64-longtest
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/536236
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Some testdir tests fail if GOEXPERIMENT=cgocheck2 is set. Fix this by
skipping these tests.
Change-Id: I58d4ef0cceb86bcf93220b4a44de9b9dc4879b16
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/499675
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This has been investigated and explained on the issue tracker.
Fixes#54402.
Change-Id: I4d8b971faa810591983ad028b7db16411f3b3b4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/461456
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Benny Siegert <bsiegert@gmail.com>
With GOEXPERIMENT=unified, the order variables are printed in "live at
entry to f.func1" is sensitive to whether regabi is enabled for some
reason. The order shouldn't matter to correctness, but it is odd.
For now, this CL just relaxes the test expectation order to unblock
enabling GOEXPERIMENT=unified by default. I've filed #54402 to
investigate further to confirm this a concern.
Updates #54402.
Change-Id: Iddfbb12c6cf7cc17b2aec8102b33761abd5f93ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/422975
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Simplify the implementation of interface conversions in the compiler.
Don't pass fields that aren't needed (the data word, usually) to the runtime.
For generics, we need to put a dynamic type in an interface. The new
dataWord function is exactly what we need (the type word will come
from a dictionary).
Change-Id: Iade5de5c174854b65ad248f35c7893c603f7be3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/340029
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
The compiler currently has two modes for compilation: one where it
compiles each function as it sees them, and another where it enqueues
them all into a work queue. A subsequent CL is going to reorder
function compilation to ensure that functions are always compiled
before any non-trivial function literals they enclose, and this will
be easier if we always use the compile work queue.
Also, fewer compilation modes makes things simpler to reason about.
Change-Id: Ie090e81f7476c49486296f2b90911fa0a466a5dd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/283313
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
When we pass these types by reference, we usually have to allocate
temporaries on the stack, initialize them, then pass their address
to the conversion functions. It's simpler to pass these types
directly by value.
This particularly applies to conversions needed for fmt.Printf
(to interface{} for constructing a [...]interface{}).
func f(a, b, c string) {
fmt.Printf("%s %s\n", a, b)
fmt.Printf("%s %s\n", b, c)
}
This function's stack frame shrinks from 200 to 136 bytes, and
its code shrinks from 535 to 453 bytes.
The go binary shrinks 0.3%.
Update #24286
Aside: for this function f, we don't really need to allocate
temporaries for the convT2E function. We could use the address
of a, b, and c directly. That might get similar (or maybe better?)
improvements. I investigated a bit, but it seemed complicated
to do it safely. This change was much easier.
Change-Id: I78cbe51b501fb41e1e324ce4203f0de56a1db82d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/135377
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The previous CL introduced stack objects. This CL removes the old
ambiguously live liveness analysis. After this CL we're relying
on stack objects exclusively.
Update a bunch of liveness tests to reflect the new world.
Fixes#22350
Change-Id: I739b26e015882231011ce6bc1a7f426049e59f31
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/134156
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Now that the buffered write barrier is implemented for all
architectures, we can remove the old eager write barrier
implementation. This CL removes the implementation from the runtime,
support in the compiler for calling it, and updates some compiler
tests that relied on the old eager barrier support. It also makes sure
that all of the useful comments from the old write barrier
implementation still have a place to live.
Fixes#22460.
Updates #21640 since this fixes the layering concerns of the write
barrier (but not the other things in that issue).
Change-Id: I580f93c152e89607e0a72fe43370237ba97bae74
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/92705
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Historically, gc optimistically parsed the left-hand side of
assignments as expressions. Later, if it discovered a ":=" assignment,
it rewrote the parsed expressions as declarations.
This failed in the presence of dot imports though, because we lost
information about whether an imported object was named via a bare
identifier "Foo" or a normal qualified "pkg.Foo".
This CL fixes the issue by specially noding the left-hand side of ":="
assignments.
Fixes#22076.
Change-Id: I18190ecdb863112e7d009e1687e6112eec559921
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66810
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When compiling concurrently, we walk all functions before compiling
any of them. Walking functions can cause variables to switch from
being non-addrtaken to addrtaken, e.g. to prepare for a runtime call.
Typechecking propagates addrtaken-ness of closure variables to
their outer variables, so that capturevars can decide whether to
pass the variable's value or a pointer to it.
When all functions are compiled immediately, as long as the containing
function is compiled prior to the closure, this propagation has no effect.
When compilation is deferred, though, in rare cases, this results in
a change in the addrtaken-ness of a variable in the outer function,
which in turn changes the compiler's output.
(This is rare because in a great many cases, a temporary has been
introduced, insulating the outer variable from modification.)
But concurrent compilation must generate identical results.
To fix this, track whether capturevars has run.
If it has, there is no need to update outer variables
when closure variables change.
Capturevars always runs before any functions are walked or compiled.
The remainder of the changes in this CL are to support the test.
In particular, -d=compilelater forces the compiler to walk all
functions before compiling any of them, despite being non-concurrent.
This is useful because -live is fundamentally incompatible with
concurrent compilation, but we want -c=1 to have no behavior changes.
Fixes#20250
Change-Id: I89bcb54268a41e8588af1ac8cc37fbef856a90c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42853
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
