1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-24 05:10:19 -07:00
Commit Graph

41 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dmitry Vyukov
0e80b2e082 cmd/gc: capture variables by value
Language specification says that variables are captured by reference.
And that is what gc compiler does. However, in lots of cases it is
possible to capture variables by value under the hood without
affecting visible behavior of programs. For example, consider
the following typical pattern:

	func (o *Obj) requestMany(urls []string) []Result {
		wg := new(sync.WaitGroup)
		wg.Add(len(urls))
		res := make([]Result, len(urls))
		for i := range urls {
			i := i
			go func() {
				res[i] = o.requestOne(urls[i])
				wg.Done()
			}()
		}
		wg.Wait()
		return res
	}

Currently o, wg, res, and i are captured by reference causing 3+len(urls)
allocations (e.g. PPARAM o is promoted to PPARAMREF and moved to heap).
But all of them can be captured by value without changing behavior.

This change implements simple strategy for capturing by value:
if a captured variable is not addrtaken and never assigned to,
then it is captured by value (it is effectively const).
This simple strategy turned out to be very effective:
~80% of all captures in std lib are turned into value captures.
The remaining 20% are mostly in defers and non-escaping closures,
that is, they do not cause allocations anyway.

benchmark                                    old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkCompressedZipGarbage                153            126            -17.65%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsSpeed1e4                91             69             -24.18%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsSpeed1e5                178            129            -27.53%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsSpeed1e6                1510           1051           -30.40%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsDefault1e4              100            75             -25.00%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsDefault1e5              193            139            -27.98%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsDefault1e6              1420           985            -30.63%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsCompress1e4             100            75             -25.00%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsCompress1e5             193            139            -27.98%
BenchmarkEncodeDigitsCompress1e6             1420           985            -30.63%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainSpeed1e4                 109            81             -25.69%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainSpeed1e5                 211            151            -28.44%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainSpeed1e6                 1588           1097           -30.92%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainDefault1e4               103            77             -25.24%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainDefault1e5               199            143            -28.14%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainDefault1e6               1324           917            -30.74%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainCompress1e4              103            77             -25.24%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainCompress1e5              190            137            -27.89%
BenchmarkEncodeTwainCompress1e6              1327           919            -30.75%
BenchmarkConcurrentDBExec                    16223          16220          -0.02%
BenchmarkConcurrentStmtQuery                 17687          16182          -8.51%
BenchmarkConcurrentStmtExec                  5191           5186           -0.10%
BenchmarkConcurrentTxQuery                   17665          17661          -0.02%
BenchmarkConcurrentTxExec                    15154          15150          -0.03%
BenchmarkConcurrentTxStmtQuery               17661          16157          -8.52%
BenchmarkConcurrentTxStmtExec                3677           3673           -0.11%
BenchmarkConcurrentRandom                    14000          13614          -2.76%
BenchmarkManyConcurrentQueries               25             22             -12.00%
BenchmarkDecodeComplex128Slice               318            252            -20.75%
BenchmarkDecodeFloat64Slice                  318            252            -20.75%
BenchmarkDecodeInt32Slice                    318            252            -20.75%
BenchmarkDecodeStringSlice                   2318           2252           -2.85%
BenchmarkDecode                              11             8              -27.27%
BenchmarkEncodeGray                          64             56             -12.50%
BenchmarkEncodeNRGBOpaque                    64             56             -12.50%
BenchmarkEncodeNRGBA                         67             58             -13.43%
BenchmarkEncodePaletted                      68             60             -11.76%
BenchmarkEncodeRGBOpaque                     64             56             -12.50%
BenchmarkGoLookupIP                          153            139            -9.15%
BenchmarkGoLookupIPNoSuchHost                508            466            -8.27%
BenchmarkGoLookupIPWithBrokenNameServer      245            226            -7.76%
BenchmarkClientServer                        62             59             -4.84%
BenchmarkClientServerParallel4               62             59             -4.84%
BenchmarkClientServerParallel64              62             59             -4.84%
BenchmarkClientServerParallelTLS4            79             76             -3.80%
BenchmarkClientServerParallelTLS64           112            109            -2.68%
BenchmarkCreateGoroutinesCapture             10             6              -40.00%
BenchmarkAfterFunc                           1006           1005           -0.10%

Fixes #6632.

Change-Id: I0cd51e4d356331d7f3c5f447669080cd19b0d2ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3166
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-01-29 13:07:30 +00:00
Dmitry Vyukov
4ce4d8b2c4 cmd/gc: allocate stack buffer for ORUNESTR
If result of string(i) does not escape,
allocate a [4]byte temp on stack for it.

Change-Id: If31ce9447982929d5b3b963fd0830efae4247c37
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3411
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-01-28 20:37:20 +00:00
Dmitry Vyukov
e6fac08146 cmd/gc: allocate buffers for non-escaped strings on stack
Currently we always allocate string buffers in heap.
For example, in the following code we allocate a temp string
just for comparison:

	if string(byteSlice) == "abc" { ... }

This change extends escape analysis to cover []byte->string
conversions and string concatenation. If the result of operations
does not escape, compiler allocates a small buffer
on stack and passes it to slicebytetostring and concatstrings.
Then runtime uses the buffer if the result fits into it.

Size of the buffer is 32 bytes. There is no fundamental theory
behind this number. Just an observation that on std lib
tests/benchmarks frequency of string allocation is inversely
proportional to string length; and there is significant number
of allocations up to length 32.

benchmark                                    old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkFprintfBytes                        2              1              -50.00%
BenchmarkDecodeComplex128Slice               318            316            -0.63%
BenchmarkDecodeFloat64Slice                  318            316            -0.63%
BenchmarkDecodeInt32Slice                    318            316            -0.63%
BenchmarkDecodeStringSlice                   2318           2316           -0.09%
BenchmarkStripTags                           11             5              -54.55%
BenchmarkDecodeGray                          111            102            -8.11%
BenchmarkDecodeNRGBAGradient                 200            188            -6.00%
BenchmarkDecodeNRGBAOpaque                   165            152            -7.88%
BenchmarkDecodePaletted                      319            309            -3.13%
BenchmarkDecodeRGB                           166            157            -5.42%
BenchmarkDecodeInterlacing                   279            268            -3.94%
BenchmarkGoLookupIP                          153            135            -11.76%
BenchmarkGoLookupIPNoSuchHost                508            466            -8.27%
BenchmarkGoLookupIPWithBrokenNameServer      245            226            -7.76%
BenchmarkClientServerParallel4               62             61             -1.61%
BenchmarkClientServerParallel64              62             61             -1.61%
BenchmarkClientServerParallelTLS4            79             78             -1.27%
BenchmarkClientServerParallelTLS64           112            111            -0.89%

benchmark                                    old ns/op      new ns/op      delta
BenchmarkFprintfBytes                        381            311            -18.37%
BenchmarkStripTags                           2615           2351           -10.10%
BenchmarkDecodeNRGBAGradient                 3715887        3635096        -2.17%
BenchmarkDecodeNRGBAOpaque                   3047645        2928644        -3.90%
BenchmarkGoLookupIP                          153            135            -11.76%
BenchmarkGoLookupIPNoSuchHost                508            466            -8.27%

Change-Id: I9ec01da816945c3329d7be3c7794b520418c3f99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3120
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-01-28 20:12:38 +00:00
Dmitry Vyukov
22c16b4b92 cmd/gc: ignore re-slicing in escape analysis
Escape analysis treats everything assigned to OIND/ODOTPTR as escaping.
As the result b escapes in the following code:

	func (b *Buffer) Foo() {
		n, m := ...
		b.buf = b.buf[n:m]
	}

This change recognizes such assignments and ignores them.

Update issue #9043.
Update issue #7921.

There are two similar cases in std lib that benefit from this optimization.
First is in archive/zip:

type readBuf []byte
func (b *readBuf) uint32() uint32 {
	v := binary.LittleEndian.Uint32(*b)
	*b = (*b)[4:]
	return v
}

Second is in time:

type data struct {
	p     []byte
	error bool
}

func (d *data) read(n int) []byte {
	if len(d.p) < n {
		d.p = nil
		d.error = true
		return nil
	}
	p := d.p[0:n]
	d.p = d.p[n:]
	return p
}

benchmark                         old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkCompressedZipGarbage     32431724      32217851      -0.66%

benchmark                         old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkCompressedZipGarbage     153            143            -6.54%

Change-Id: Ia6cd32744e02e36d6d8c19f402f8451101711626
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3162
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-01-28 17:37:55 +00:00
Dmitry Vyukov
1b87f01239 cmd/gc: improve escape analysis for &T{...}
Currently all PTRLIT element initializers escape. There is no reason for that.
This change links STRUCTLIT to PTRLIT; STRUCTLIT element initializers are
already linked to the STRUCTLIT. As the result, PTRLIT element initializers
escape when PTRLIT itself escapes.

Change-Id: I89ecd8677cbf81addcfd469cd2fd461c0e9bf7dd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3031
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-01-28 16:59:01 +00:00
Russ Cox
00d2f916ad cmd/gc: run escape analysis always (even in -N mode)
Fixes #8585.
Removes some little-used code paths.

LGTM=josharian
R=golang-codereviews, minux, josharian
CC=golang-codereviews, iant, r
https://golang.org/cl/132970043
2014-09-24 15:20:03 -04:00
Russ Cox
f20e4d5ecb cmd/gc: fix &result escaping into result
There is a hierarchy of location defined by loop depth:

        -1 = the heap
        0 = function results
        1 = local variables (and parameters)
        2 = local variable declared inside a loop
        3 = local variable declared inside a loop inside a loop
        etc

In general if an address from loopdepth n is assigned to
something in loop depth m < n, that indicates an extended
lifetime of some form that requires a heap allocation.

Function results can be local variables too, though, and so
they don't actually fit into the hierarchy very well.
Treat the address of a function result as level 1 so that
if it is written back into a result, the address is treated
as escaping.

Fixes #8185.

LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/108870044
2014-06-11 14:21:06 -04:00
Russ Cox
775ab8eeaa cmd/gc: fix escape analysis for &x inside switch x := v.(type)
The analysis for &x was using the loop depth on x set
during x's declaration. A type switch creates a list of
implicit declarations that were not getting initialized
with loop depths.

Fixes #8176.

LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/108860043
2014-06-11 11:48:47 -04:00
Russ Cox
fe3c913443 cmd/gc: fix escape analysis of func returning indirect of parameter
I introduced this bug when I changed the escape
analysis to run in phases based on call graph
dependency order, in order to be more precise about
inputs escaping back to outputs (functions returning
their arguments).

Given

        func f(z **int) *int { return *z }

we were tagging the function as 'z does not escape
and is not returned', which is all true, but not
enough information.

If used as:

        var x int
        p := &x
        q := &p
        leak(f(q))

then the compiler might try to keep x, p, and q all
on the stack, since (according to the recorded
information) nothing interesting ends up being
passed to leak.

In fact since f returns *q = p, &x is passed to leak
and x needs to be heap allocated.

To trigger the bug, you need a chain that the
compiler wants to keep on the stack (like x, p, q
above), and you need a function that returns an
indirect of its argument, and you need to pass the
head of the chain to that function. This doesn't
come up very often: this bug has been present since
June 2012 (between Go 1 and Go 1.1) and we haven't
seen it until now. It helps that most functions that
return indirects are getters that are simple enough
to be inlined, avoiding the bug.

Earlier versions of Go also had the benefit that if
&x really wasn't used beyond x's lifetime, nothing
broke if you put &x in a heap-allocated structure
accidentally. With the new stack copying, though,
heap-allocated structures containing &x are not
updated when the stack is copied and x moves,
leading to crashes in Go 1.3 that were not crashes
in Go 1.2 or Go 1.1.

The fix is in two parts.

First, in the analysis of a function, recognize when
a value obtained via indirect of a parameter ends up
being returned. Mark those parameters as having
content escape back to the return results (but we
don't bother to write down which result).

Second, when using the analysis to analyze, say,
f(q), mark parameters with content escaping as
having any indirections escape to the heap. (We
don't bother trying to match the content to the
return value.)

The fix could be less precise (simpler).
In the first part we might mark all content-escaping
parameters as plain escaping, and then the second
part could be dropped. Or we might assume that when
calling f(q) all the things pointed at by q escape
always (for any f and q).

The fix could also be more precise (more complex).
We might record the specific mapping from parameter
to result along with the number of indirects from the
parameter to the thing being returned as the result,
and then at the call sites we could set up exactly the
right graph for the called function. That would make
notleaks(f(q)) be able to keep x on the stack, because
the reuslt of f(q) isn't passed to anything that leaks it.

The less precise the fix, the more stack allocations
become heap allocations.

This fix is exactly as precise as it needs to be so that
none of the current stack allocations in the standard
library turn into heap allocations.

Fixes #8120.

LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=golang-codereviews, khr, r
https://golang.org/cl/102040046
2014-06-03 11:35:59 -04:00
Russ Cox
f078711b41 cmd/gc: fix escape analysis for slice of array
Fixes #7931.

LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/100390044
2014-05-12 14:45:05 -04:00
Russ Cox
c99dce2b05 cmd/gc: fix ... escape analysis bug
If the ... element type contained no pointers,
then the escape analysis did not track the ... itself.
This manifested in an escaping ...byte being treated
as non-escaping.

Fixes #7934.

LGTM=iant
R=golang-codereviews, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/100310043
2014-05-09 15:40:45 -04:00
Russ Cox
e5d742fcad cmd/gc: relax address-of escape analysis
Make the loop nesting depth of &x depend on where x is declared,
not on where the &x appears. The latter is only a conservative
estimate of the former. Being more careful can avoid some
variables escaping, and it is easier to reason about.

It would have avoided issue 7313, although that was still a bug
worth fixing.

Not much effect in the tree: one variable in the whole tree
is saved from a heap allocation (something in x509 parsing).

LGTM=daniel.morsing
R=daniel.morsing
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/62380043
2014-02-13 19:59:09 -05:00
Daniel Morsing
e0a55a6c98 cmd/gc: for loop init statement misanalyzed by escape analysis
Logically, the init statement is in the enclosing scopes loopdepth, not inside the for loop.

Fixes #7313.

LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, gobot, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/62430043
2014-02-13 19:04:43 +00:00
Robert Griesemer
99d87720ad test: avoid future 'declared and not used' error
See also issue 6414.

R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/13683044
2013-09-17 15:24:54 -07:00
Russ Cox
148fac79a3 cmd/gc: fix escape analysis ordering
Functions without bodies were excluded from the ordering logic,
because when I wrote the ordering logic there was no reason to
analyze them.

But then we added //go:noescape tags that need analysis, and we
didn't update the ordering logic.

So in the absence of good ordering, //go:noescape only worked
if it appeared before the use in the source code.

Fixes #5773.

R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/10570043
2013-06-25 17:28:49 -04:00
Rémy Oudompheng
3577398f82 test: add test for issue 3888.
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/9676043
2013-05-22 22:45:38 +02:00
Russ Cox
38e9b0773d cmd/gc: fix escape analysis of method values
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7518050
2013-03-20 23:53:27 -04:00
Rémy Oudompheng
20c7e41555 cmd/gc: fix escape analysis bug.
It used to not mark parameters as escaping if only one of the
fields it points to leaks out of the function. This causes
problems when importing from another package.

Fixes #4964.

R=rsc, lvd, dvyukov, daniel.morsing
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7648045
2013-03-15 09:03:45 +01:00
Russ Cox
fd178d6a7e cmd/gc: add way to specify 'noescape' for extern funcs
A new comment directive //go:noescape instructs the compiler
that the following external (no body) func declaration should be
treated as if none of its arguments escape to the heap.

Fixes #4099.

R=golang-dev, dave, minux.ma, daniel.morsing, remyoudompheng, adg, agl, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/7289048
2013-02-05 07:00:38 -05:00
Russ Cox
572d984eaa cmd/gc: fix escape analysis
If the analysis reached a node twice, then the analysis was cut off.
However, if the second arrival is at a lower depth (closer to escaping)
then it is important to repeat the traversal.

The repeating must be cut off at some point to avoid the occasional
infinite recursion. This CL cuts it off as soon as possible while still
passing all tests.

Fixes #4751.

R=ken2
CC=golang-dev, lvd
https://golang.org/cl/7303043
2013-02-04 22:48:31 -05:00
Rémy Oudompheng
1dcf658f6d cmd/gc: remove an incorrect assertion in escape analysis.
A fatal error used to happen when escassign-ing a multiple
function return to a single node. However, the situation
naturally appears when using "go f(g())" or "defer f(g())",
because g() is escassign-ed to sink.

Fixes #4529.

R=golang-dev, lvd, minux.ma, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6920060
2012-12-20 23:27:28 +01:00
Luuk van Dijk
507fcf37d2 cmd/gc: escape analysis to track flow of in to out parameters.
includes step 0: synthesize outparams, from 6600044
includes step 1,2: give outparams loopdepth 0 and verify unchanged results
         generate esc:$mask tags, but still tie to sink if a param has mask != 0
from 6610054

adds final steps:
- have esccall generate n->escretval, a list of nodes the function results flow to
- use these in esccall and ORETURN/OAS2FUNC/and f(g())
- only tie parameters to sink if tag is absent, otherwise according to mask, tie them to escretval

R=rsc, bradfitz
CC=dave, gobot, golang-dev, iant, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/6741044
2012-10-29 13:38:21 +01:00
Russ Cox
54af752865 cmd/gc: fix escape analysis bug
Was not handling &x.y[0] and &x.y.z correctly where
y is an array or struct-valued field (not a pointer).

R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6551059
2012-09-24 15:53:12 -04:00
Russ Cox
cd22afa07b test: expand run.go's errorcheck, make clear which bugs run
Today, if run.go doesn't understand a test header line it just ignores
the test, making it too easy to write or edit tests that are not actually
being run.

- expand errorcheck to accept flags, so that bounds.go and escape*.go can run.
- create a whitelist of skippable tests in run.go; skipping others is an error.
- mark all skipped tests at top of file.

Update #4139.

R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6549054
2012-09-23 13:16:14 -04:00
Rémy Oudompheng
ba97d52b85 cmd/gc: fix escape analysis bug with variable capture in loops.
Fixes #3975.

R=rsc, lvd
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/6475061
2012-08-31 22:23:37 +02:00
Luuk van Dijk
5583060c4c cmd/gc: fix addresses escaping through closures called in-place.
Fixes #3545.

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6061043
2012-04-23 15:39:01 -04:00
Russ Cox
075eef4018 gc: fix escape analysis + inlining + closure bug
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev, lvd
https://golang.org/cl/5693056
2012-02-23 23:09:53 -05:00
Rob Pike
83976e3ac8 test: explanatory comments [c-g]*
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5656103
2012-02-19 14:28:53 +11:00
Rémy Oudompheng
94ff311d1b gc: avoid false positives when using scalar struct fields.
The escape analysis code does not make a distinction between
scalar and pointers fields in structs. Non-pointer fields
that escape should not make the whole struct escape.

R=lvd, rsc
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/5489128
2012-01-12 12:08:40 +01:00
Russ Cox
4a6b07f235 gc: enable inlining by default
R=lvd, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5531058
2012-01-10 20:08:53 -08:00
Luuk van Dijk
9bf3478658 gc: better loopdepth analysis for labels
This avoids degraded performance caused by extra labels
emitted by inlining (breaking strconv ftoa alloc count unittest) and is better in any case.

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5483071
2011-12-15 17:35:59 +01:00
Russ Cox
434a6c85cb gc: use gofmt spacing when printing map type
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5450071
2011-12-02 14:45:07 -05:00
Luuk van Dijk
29a5ae657f gc: small fixes for printing.
mark OADDR inserted by typecheck as implicit
OCOPY takes ->left and ->right, not ->list
OMAKE*'s can all have arguments
precedence for OIND was initalized twice

fixes #2414

R=rsc, dave
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5319065
2011-11-02 15:36:33 +01:00
Russ Cox
b4df33a6ea gc: test + fix escape analysis bug
R=lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5333049
2011-11-01 11:02:43 -04:00
Luuk van Dijk
b536adbfba gc: changes to export format in preparation for inlining.
string literals used as package qualifiers are now prefixed with '@'
which obviates the need for the extra ':' before tags.

R=rsc, gri, lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5129057
2011-10-08 19:37:06 +02:00
Luuk van Dijk
f2460a8c57 gc: treat DOTMETH like DOT in escape analysis.
Fixes #2225

R=rsc, nigeltao, dave
CC=bradfitz, golang-dev, mikioh.mikioh
https://golang.org/cl/4972056
2011-09-07 19:03:11 +02:00
Russ Cox
60d47101aa gc: fix label recursion bugs
Was keeping a pointer to the labeled statement in n->right,
which meant that generic traversals of the tree visited it twice.
That combined with aggressive flattening of the block
structure when possible during parsing meant that
the kinds of label: code label: code label: code sequences
generated by yacc were giving the recursion 2ⁿ paths
through the program.

Fixes #2212.

R=lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4960050
2011-09-01 13:44:46 -04:00
Russ Cox
77f0bdce07 gc: fix arm build
Escape analysis was incorrectly assuming that
functions without bodies don't leak their
parameters.  This meant that sync/atomic's
TestAddInt64 was allocating x on its stack,
and then x was not properly aligned for use
with the atomic 64-bit instructions.  Obviously
we should figure out the alignment story on 5g
too, but this fix is correct and should restore the
build to 'ok'.

TBR=lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4964047
2011-08-28 23:29:34 -04:00
Russ Cox
db5f9da425 gc: tweak and enable escape analysis
-s now means *disable* escape analysis.

Fix escape leaks for struct/slice/map literals.
Add ... tracking.
Rewrite new(T) and slice literal into stack allocation when safe.

Add annotations to reflect.
Reflect is too chummy with the compiler,
so changes like these affect it more than they should.

R=lvd, dave, gustavo
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4954043
2011-08-28 12:05:00 -04:00
Russ Cox
0227c45ede gc: fix some spurious leaks
Probably will spark some discussion.  ☺

R=lvd
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4948041
2011-08-25 09:26:13 -04:00
Luuk van Dijk
847b61b554 gc: Escape analysis.
For now it's switch-on-and-offable with -s, and the effects can be inspected
with -m.  Defaults are the old codepaths.

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4634073
2011-08-24 19:07:08 +02:00