When rnd is called with a second argument of 1, it simply
returns the first argument anyway.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4820045
The data race is on newly published Itab nodes, which are
both unsafely published and unsafely acquired. It can
break on IA-32/Intel64 due to compiler optimizations
(most likely not an issue as of now) and on ARM due to
hardware memory access reorderings.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4673055
go/types: update for export data format change
reflect: require package qualifiers to match during interface check
runtime: require package qualifiers to match during interface check
test: fixed bug324, adapt to be silent
Fixes#1550.
Issue 1536 remains open.
R=gri, ken2, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4442071
* Reduces malloc counts during gob encoder/decoder test from 6/6 to 3/5.
The current reflect uses Set to mean two subtly different things.
(1) If you have a reflect.Value v, it might just represent
itself (as in v = reflect.NewValue(42)), in which case calling
v.Set only changed v, not any other data in the program.
(2) If you have a reflect Value v derived from a pointer
or a slice (as in x := []int{42}; v = reflect.NewValue(x).Index(0)),
v represents the value held there. Changing x[0] affects the
value returned by v.Int(), and calling v.Set affects x[0].
This was not really by design; it just happened that way.
The motivation for the new reflect implementation was
to remove mallocs. The use case (1) has an implicit malloc
inside it. If you can do:
v := reflect.NewValue(0)
v.Set(42)
i := v.Int() // i = 42
then that implies that v is referring to some underlying
chunk of memory in order to remember the 42; that is,
NewValue must have allocated some memory.
Almost all the time you are using reflect the goal is to
inspect or to change other data, not to manipulate data
stored solely inside a reflect.Value.
This CL removes use case (1), so that an assignable
reflect.Value must always refer to some other piece of data
in the program. Put another way, removing this case would
make
v := reflect.NewValue(0)
v.Set(42)
as illegal as
0 = 42.
It would also make this illegal:
x := 0
v := reflect.NewValue(x)
v.Set(42)
for the same reason. (Note that right now, v.Set(42) "succeeds"
but does not change the value of x.)
If you really wanted to make v refer to x, you'd start with &x
and dereference it:
x := 0
v := reflect.NewValue(&x).Elem() // v = *&x
v.Set(42)
It's pretty rare, except in tests, to want to use NewValue and then
call Set to change the Value itself instead of some other piece of
data in the program. I haven't seen it happen once yet while
making the tree build with this change.
For the same reasons, reflect.Zero (formerly reflect.MakeZero)
would also return an unassignable, unaddressable value.
This invalidates the (awkward) idiom:
pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
v := reflect.Zero(pv.Type().Elem())
pv.PointTo(v)
which, when the API changed, turned into:
pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
v := reflect.Zero(pv.Type().Elem())
pv.Set(v.Addr())
In both, it is far from clear what the code is trying to do. Now that
it is possible, this CL adds reflect.New(Type) Value that does the
obvious thing (same as Go's new), so this code would be replaced by:
pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
pv.Set(reflect.New(pv.Type().Elem()))
The changes just described can be confusing to think about,
but I believe it is because the old API was confusing - it was
conflating two different kinds of Values - and that the new API
by itself is pretty simple: you can only Set (or call Addr on)
a Value if it actually addresses some real piece of data; that is,
only if it is the result of dereferencing a Ptr or indexing a Slice.
If you really want the old behavior, you'd get it by translating:
v := reflect.NewValue(x)
into
v := reflect.New(reflect.Typeof(x)).Elem()
v.Set(reflect.NewValue(x))
Gofix will not be able to help with this, because whether
and how to change the code depends on whether the original
code meant use (1) or use (2), so the developer has to read
and think about the code.
You can see the effect on packages in the tree in
https://golang.org/cl/4423043/.
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4435042
Fix problems found.
On amd64, various library routines had bigger
stack frames than expected, because large function
calls had been added.
runtime.assertI2T: nosplit stack overflow
120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertI2T
8 after runtime.assertI2T uses 112
0 on entry to runtime.newTypeAssertionError
-8 on entry to runtime.morestack01
runtime.assertE2E: nosplit stack overflow
120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2E
16 after runtime.assertE2E uses 104
8 on entry to runtime.panic
0 on entry to runtime.morestack16
-8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8
runtime.assertE2T: nosplit stack overflow
120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2T
16 after runtime.assertE2T uses 104
8 on entry to runtime.panic
0 on entry to runtime.morestack16
-8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8
runtime.newselect: nosplit stack overflow
120 assumed on entry to runtime.newselect
56 after runtime.newselect uses 64
48 on entry to runtime.printf
8 after runtime.printf uses 40
0 on entry to vprintf
-8 on entry to runtime.morestack16
runtime.selectdefault: nosplit stack overflow
120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectdefault
56 after runtime.selectdefault uses 64
48 on entry to runtime.printf
8 after runtime.printf uses 40
0 on entry to vprintf
-8 on entry to runtime.morestack16
runtime.selectgo: nosplit stack overflow
120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectgo
0 after runtime.selectgo uses 120
-8 on entry to runtime.gosched
On arm, 5c was tagging functions NOSPLIT that should
not have been, like the recursive function printpanics:
printpanics: nosplit stack overflow
124 assumed on entry to printpanics
112 after printpanics uses 12
108 on entry to printpanics
96 after printpanics uses 12
92 on entry to printpanics
80 after printpanics uses 12
76 on entry to printpanics
64 after printpanics uses 12
60 on entry to printpanics
48 after printpanics uses 12
44 on entry to printpanics
32 after printpanics uses 12
28 on entry to printpanics
16 after printpanics uses 12
12 on entry to printpanics
0 after printpanics uses 12
-4 on entry to printpanics
R=r, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4188061
GC is still single-threaded.
Multiple threads will happen in another CL.
Garbage collection pauses are typically
about half as long as they were before this CL.
R=brainman, iant, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3975046
Prefix all external symbols in runtime by runtime·,
to avoid conflicts with possible symbols of the same
name in linked-in C libraries. The obvious conflicts
are printf, malloc, and free, but hide everything to
avoid future pain.
The symbols left alone are:
** known to cgo **
_cgo_free
_cgo_malloc
libcgo_thread_start
initcgo
ncgocall
** known to linker **
_rt0_$GOARCH
_rt0_$GOARCH_$GOOS
text
etext
data
end
pclntab
epclntab
symtab
esymtab
** known to C compiler **
_divv
_modv
_div64by32
etc (arch specific)
Tested on darwin/386, darwin/amd64, linux/386, linux/amd64.
Built (but not tested) for freebsd/386, freebsd/amd64, linux/arm, windows/386.
R=r, PeterGo
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/2899041
* Code for assignment, conversions now mirrors spec.
* Changed some snprint -> smprint.
* Renamed runtime functions to separate
interface conversions from type assertions:
convT2I, assertI2T, etc.
* Correct checking of \U sequences.
Fixes#840.
Fixes#830.
Fixes#778.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/1303042
bonus: type switch now detects multiple uses of identical interface types.
bonus: interface types are now order-independent, following the spec.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/194053
because they are in package runtime.
another step to enforcing package boundaries.
R=r
DELTA=732 (114 added, 93 deleted, 525 changed)
OCL=35811
CL=35824