The general policy for the current state of js/wasm is that it only
has to support tests that are also supported by nacl.
The test nilptr3.go makes assumptions about which nil checks can be
removed. Since WebAssembly does not signal on reading a null pointer,
all nil checks have to be explicit.
Updates #18892
Change-Id: I06a687860b8d22ae26b1c391499c0f5183e4c485
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110096
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
An instruction consisting of all 0s causes an illegal instruction
signal on s390x. Since 0s are the default in this test this CL just
makes it explicit.
Change-Id: Id6e060eed1a588f4b10a4e4861709fcd19b434ac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20962
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Skip fixedbugs/issue10607.go because external linking is not supported
yet.
Skip nilptr3.go because of issue #9058 (same as ppc64).
Change-Id: Ib3dfbd9a03ee4052871cf57c74b3cc5e745e1f80
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14461
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
As detailed in #11910, the current implementation attempts to execute an area
of memory with unknown content. If the memory is executable, the result is
unpredictable - instead, make the test deterministic by attempting to execute
an instruction that is known to trigger a trap on the given architecture.
The new implementation is written by iant@ and provided via #11910.
Update issue #11910
Change-Id: Ia698c36e0dd98a9d9d16a701f60f6748c6faf896
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15058
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <jsing@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Russ Cox fixed this issue for other systems
in CL 12026, but the Plan 9 part was forgotten.
Fixes#11656.
Change-Id: I91c033687987ba43d13ad8f42e3fe4c7a78e6075
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12762
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
