We already have and use FixVariadicCall to normalize non-dotted calls
to variadic functions elsewhere in the compiler to simplify rewriting
of function calls. This CL updates inl.go to use it too.
A couple tests need to be updated to (correctly) expect diagnostics
about "... argument" instead of a slice literal. This is because
inl.go previously failed to set Implicit on the slice literal node.
Change-Id: I76bd79b95ae1f16e3b26ff7e9e1c468f538fd1f0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/323009
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
This CL changes "T literal.M" error message to "T{...}.M". It's clearer
expression and focusing user on actual issue.
Updates #38745
Change-Id: I84b455a86742f37e0bde5bf390aa02984eecc3c9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/253677
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
As a side effect of working on mid-stack inlining, we've fixed support
for inlining variadic functions. Might as well enable it.
Change-Id: I7f555f8b941969791db7eb598c0b49f6dc0820aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/100456
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This fixes a bug in -l=3 or higher.
To inline a variadic function, the compiler generates code that constructs
a slice of arguments for the variadic parameter. Consider the function
func Foo(xs ...string)
and the call Foo("hello", "world"). To inline the call to Foo, the
compiler used to generate
xs := [2]string{"hello", "world"}[:]
which doesn't type check:
invalid operation [2]string literal[:] (slice of unaddressable value).
Now, the compiler generates
xs := []string{"hello", "world"}
which does type check.
Fixes#18116.
Change-Id: I0ee531ef2e6cc276db6fb12602b25a46d6d5db21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33671
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
