*ast.ArrayTypes are type expressions like "[]foo" or "[2]int". They
show up as standalone types (e.g. "var foo []int") and as part of
composite literals (e.g. "[]int{}"). I made the following
improvements:
- Always expect a type name for array types.
- Add a "type modifier" for array types so completions can be smart
when we know the expected type. For example:
var foo []int
foo = []i<>
we know we want a type name, but we also know the expected type is
"[]int". When evaluating type names such as "int" we turn the type
into a slice type "[]int" to match against the expected type.
- Tweak the AST fixing to add a phantom selector "_" after a naked
"[]" so you can complete directly after the right bracket.
I split out the type name related type inference bits into a separate
typeNameInference struct. It had become confusing and complicated,
especially now that you can have an expected type and expect a type
name at the same time.
Change-Id: I00878532187ee5366ab8d681346532e36fa58e5f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/197438
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change fixes documentation for completion items by using cached
package and AST information to derive the documentation. We also add
testing for documentation in completion items.
Change-Id: I911fb80f5cef88640fc06a9fe474e5da403657e3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/189237
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Fix the following issues:
- We were trying to complete struct literal field names for
selector expressions (e.g. "Foo{a.B<>}"). Now we only complete field
names in this case if the expression is an *ast.Ident.
- We weren't including lexical completions in cases where you might be
completing a field name or a variable name (e.g. "Foo{A<>}").
I refactored composite literal logic to live mostly in one place. Now
enclosingCompositeLiteral computes all the bits of information related
to composite literals. The expected type, completion, and snippet code
make use of those precalculated facts instead of redoing the work.
Change-Id: I29fc808544382c3c77f0bba1843520e04f38e79b
GitHub-Last-Rev: 3489062be342ab0f00325d3b3ae9ce681df7cf2e
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#96
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/176601
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Completion suppression in comments wasn't working for comments in
switch case statements, select case statements, and decl statements.
Rather than adding those to the list of leaf ast.Node types to look
for, we now always check if the position is in a comment. This fix
broke some completion tests that were using re"$" since "$" matches
after the comment "//" characters.
We now also don't complete within any literal values. Previously we
only excluded string literals.
Change-Id: If02f39f79fe2cd7417e39dbac2c6f84a484391ec
GitHub-Last-Rev: 7ab3f526b6752a8f74413dcd268382d359e1beba
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/173518
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Also, trigger signature help on completion of a function (the "(" as a
trigger character doesn't work if it's part of a completion).
Change-Id: I952cb875fa72a741d7952178f85e20f9efa3ebff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/150638
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Use the packagestest framework to test completion. Add support for a
slice of token.Position to packagestest to support this.
Change-Id: Ie5ddece4446a3c74419727461a77faa3788cb040
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/148197
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
