Currently, to write out the bitmap of a slice of a type with a GCprog,
we construct a new GCprog that executes the underlying type's GCprog
to write out the bitmap once and then repeats those bits n more times.
This results in n+1 repetitions of the bitmap, which is one more
repetition than it should be. This corrupts the bitmap of the heap
following the slice and may write past the mapped bitmap memory and
segfault.
Fix this by repeating the bitmap only n-1 more times.
Fixes#11430.
Change-Id: Ic24854363bffc5a755b66f257339f9309ada3aa5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11570
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
A comment in waitgroup.go describes the following scenario
as the reason to have dynamically created semaphores:
// G1: Add(1)
// G1: go G2()
// G1: Wait() // Context switch after Unlock() and before Semacquire().
// G2: Done() // Release semaphore: sema == 1, waiters == 0. G1 doesn't run yet.
// G3: Wait() // Finds counter == 0, waiters == 0, doesn't block.
// G3: Add(1) // Makes counter == 1, waiters == 0.
// G3: go G4()
// G3: Wait() // G1 still hasn't run, G3 finds sema == 1, unblocked! Bug.
However, the scenario is incorrect:
G3: Add(1) happens concurrently with G1: Wait(),
and so there is no reasonable behavior of the program
(G1: Wait() may or may not wait for G3: Add(1) which
can't be the intended behavior).
With this conclusion we can:
1. Remove dynamic allocation of semaphores.
2. Remove the mutex entirely and instead pack counter and waiters
into single uint64.
This makes the logic significantly simpler, both Add and Wait
do only a single atomic RMW to update the state.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkWaitGroupUncontended 30.6 32.7 +6.86%
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait 722 595 -17.59%
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait-2 396 319 -19.44%
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait-4 224 183 -18.30%
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait-8 134 106 -20.90%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait 2 1 -50.00%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkWaitGroupActuallyWait 48 16 -66.67%
Change-Id: I28911f3243aa16544e99ac8f1f5af31944c7ea3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4117
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This commit fixes a cosmetic defect whereby quick.Check reports that
the provided function returns too many values when it may, in fact,
return too few:
func f() {}
func TestFoo(t *testing.T) {
if err := quick.Check(f, nil); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
}
// yields
// $ go test -v foo_test.go
// === RUN TestFoo
// --- FAIL: TestFoo (0.00s)
// foo_test.go:76: function returns more than one value.
Change-Id: Ia209ff5b57375b30f8db425454e80798908e8ff4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11281
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Not sure if I'm on time for 1.5; Unicode 8 just got released.
Straighforward upgrade. Only changed maketables.go to prevent it from adding
the Cherokee upper and lower case mappings. This change causes the caseOrbit
table to NOT change. Added tests to verify that the relevant functions still
produce the correct result, even for Cherokee.
Fixes#11309
Change-Id: I42850f5b3399bde125b002efc78eff96dbd86a08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11286
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Removes the remains of the old C based stepflt implementation.
Also removed goto usage.
Change-Id: Ida4742c49000fae4fea4649f28afde630ce4c577
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9600
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The new inlined code for append assumed that it could pass the
desired new cap to growslice, not the number of new elements.
But growslice still interpreted the argument as the number of new elements,
making it always grow by >2x (more precisely, 2x+1 rounded up
to the next malloc block size). At the time, I had intended to change
the other callers to use the new cap as well, but it's too late for that.
Instead, introduce growslice_n for the old callers and keep growslice
for the inlined (common case) caller.
Fixes#11403.
Filed #11419 to merge them.
Change-Id: I1338b1e5b352f3be4e43641f44b652ef7195251b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11541
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Includes a new net/http test too.
Fixes#11202
Change-Id: I61edc594f4de8eb6780b8dfa221269dd482e8f35
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11492
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
All other exported errors in net/http are commented. This change adds
documentation to ErrNoCookie and ErrNoLocation to explain where they are
returned, and why.
Change-Id: I21fa0d070dd35256681ad0714000f238477d4af1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11044
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This adds a GC bitmap test of a type with many pointer bits and a
large scalar tail, such as the one in issue #11286. This test would
have failed prior to the fix in a8ae93f. This test is a more direct
version of the test introduced in that commit (which was distilled
from the failing test in the issue).
Change-Id: I2e716cd1000b49bde237f5da6d857e8983fe7e7a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11423
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently we test bitmap repetitions constructed by the compiler (for
small arrays) and repetitions performed by GC programs (large arrays
and reflect-constructed arrays), but we don't test dynamic repetitions
performed by the runtime for slice backing stores. Add tests that
parallel the array tests using slices.
Change-Id: If4425941a33cc5b20178dd819a7371e347e47585
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11422
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The consecutive calls to Head would sometimes get different
connections depending on if the readLoop had finished executing
and placed its connection on the idle list or not. This change
ensures that readLoop completes before we make our second connection.
Fixes#11250
Change-Id: Ibdbc4d3d0aba0162452f6dec5928355a37dda70a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11170
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The original version of applyRelocationsARM was added in
http://golang.org/cl/7266. It was added to fix the ARM build, which
had been broken by http://golang.org/cl/6780.
Before CL 6780, there was no relocation processing for ARM. CL 6780
changed the code to require relocation processing for every supported
target. CL 7266 fixed the ARM build by adding a relocation processing
function, but in fact no actual processing was done. The code only
looked for REL32 relocations, but ARM debug info has no such
relocations. The test case added in CL 7266 doesn't have any either.
This didn't matter because no relocation processing was required on
ARM, at least not for GCC-generated debug info. GCC generates ABS32
relocations, but only against section symbols which have the value 0.
Therefore, the addition done by correct handling of ABS32 doesn't
change anything.
Clang, however, generates ABS32 relocations against local symbols,
some of which have non-zero values. For those, we need to handle
ABS32 relocations.
This patch corrects the CL 7266 to look for ABS32 relocations instead
of REL32 relocations. The code was already written to correctly
handle ABS32 relocations, it just mistakenly said REL32.
This is the ARM equivalent of https://golang.org/cl/96680045, which
fixed the same problem in the same way for clang on 386.
With this patch, clang-3.5 can be used to build Go on ARM GNU/Linux.
Fixes#8980.
Change-Id: I0c2d72eadfe6373bde99cd03eee40de6a582dda1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11222
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If an encrypted PEM block contained ciphertext that was not a multiple
of the block size then the code would panic. This change tests for that
case and returns an error.
Fixes#11215.
Change-Id: I7b700f99e20810c4f545519b1e9d766b4640e8a7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11097
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
In walkdiv, an OMUL node was created and passed to typecheck,
before the op was changed back to OHMUL. In some instances,
the node that came back was an evaluated literal constant that
occurred with a full multiply. The end result was a literal node
with a non-shifted value and an OHMUL op. This change causes code
to be generated for the OHMUL.
Fixes#11358Fixes#11369
Change-Id: If42a98c6830d07fe065d5ca57717704fb8cfbd33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11400
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Instrument operands of OKEY.
Also instrument OSLICESTR. Previously it was not needed
because of preceeding bounds checks (which were instrumented).
But the preceeding bounds checks have disappeared.
Change-Id: I3b0de213e23cbcf5b8ef800abeded5eeeb3f8287
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11417
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The issue was identified while
working with round trip FileInfo of the headers of hardlinks. Also,
additional test cases for hard link handling.
(review carried over from http://golang.org/cl/165860043)
Fixes#9027
Change-Id: I9e3a724c8de72eb1b0fbe0751a7b488894911b76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6790
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
No need to update the date; this is not a spec change.
Change-Id: I10a31234ed985c59e5d9b5328664a36661cef31e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11531
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Some old buggy browsers sent extra CRLF(s) after POST bodies. Skip
over them before reading subsequent requests.
Fixes#10876
Change-Id: I62eacf2b3e985caffa85aee3de39d8cd3548130b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11491
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
At some point it silently stopped recognizing test output.
Meanwhile two tests degraded...
Change-Id: I90a0325fc9aaa16c3ef16b9c4c642581da2bb10c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11416
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If a client sent a POST with a huge request body, calling
req.Body.Close in the handler (which is implicit at the end of a
request) would end up consuming it all.
Put a cap on that, using the same threshold used elsewhere for similar
cases.
Fixes#9662
Change-Id: I26628413aa5f623a96ef7c2609a8d03c746669e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11412
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Negative width arguments now left align the way a minus-width in the
format string aligns. The minus in the format string overrides the sign
of the argument as in C.
Precision behavior is modified to include an error if the argument is
negative. This differs from a negative precision in a format string
which just terminates the format.
Additional checks for large magnitude widths and precisions are added to
make the runtime behavior (failure, but with different error messages),
more consistent between format string specified width/precision and
argument specified width/precision.
Fixes#11376
Change-Id: I8c7ed21088e9c18128a45d4c487c5ab9fafd13ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11405
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Instead of ambiguously referring to "the Client's CheckRedirect
function" in Head, describe the default behavior like for Get as users
aren't expected to change DefaultClient.CheckRedirect.
While here, use consistent punctuation for the Get and Head Client
method documentation.
Change-Id: I9e7046c73b0d0bc4de002234924d9e7c59aceb41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11362
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Just a copy, other than adding a header, preparatory to preparing the release notes.
Change-Id: Ia4dc27777b96b1e898d9873e7d38e6e795057698
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11474
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The ListenAndServerTLS function still requires the certFile and
keyFile, but the Server.ListenAndServerTLS method doesn't need to
require the certFile and keyFile if the Server.TLSConfig.Certificates
are already populated.
Fixes#8599
Change-Id: Id2e3433732f93e2619bfd78891f775d89f1d651e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11413
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
For debuggers and other program inspectors.
Fixes#9914.
Change-Id: I670728cea28c045e6eaba1808c550ee2f34d16ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11341
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The code formatting mechanism can be applied to partial Go code,
such as a list of statements. The statements are wrapped into a
function definition (to be parsed fine), and unwrapped after formatting.
When the statements contain //line annotations, it may fail,
because not all comments are flushed by the printer before the final '}'.
Formatting "\ta()\n//line :1" results in "\ta() }\n\n//line", which
is wrong.
Tweaked the wrapping/unwrapping code to make sure comments are flushed
before the '}'.
Fixes#11276
Change-Id: Id15c80279b0382ee9ed939cca1647f525c4929f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11282
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The test is flaky on builders lately. I don't see any issues other than
usage of very small sleeps. So increase the sleeps. Also take opportunity
to refactor the code.
On my machine this change significantly reduces failure rate with GOMAXPROCS=2.
I can't reproduce the failure with GOMAXPROCS=1.
Fixes#10726
Change-Id: Iea6f10cf3ce1be5c112a2375d51c13687a8ab4c9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9803
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
To date, the behavior has depended on whether we're using cgo and
in turn what the host resolver does. Most host resolvers will "resolve"
IP addresses, but the non-cgo pure Go path has not.
This CL makes resolution of IP addresses always work, even if we're not using cgo
and even if the host resolver does not "resolve" IP addresses.
Fixes#11335.
Change-Id: I19e82be968154d94904bb2f72e9c17893019a909
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11420
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
