1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-15 03:20:31 -07:00
Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matthew Dempsky
b2b5e779f5 cmd/compile: ignore receiver parameters in Eqtype
Receiver parameters generally aren't relevant to the function
signature type. In particular:

  1. When checking whether a type's method implements an interface's
     method, we specifically want to ignore the receiver parameters,
     because they'll be different.

  2. When checking interface type equality, interface methods always
     use the same "fakethis" *struct{} type as their receiver.

  3. Finally, method expressions and method values degenerate into
     receiver-less function types.

The only case where we care about receiver types matching is in
addmethod, which is easily handled by adding an extra Eqtype check of
the receiver parameters. Also, added a test for this, since
(surprisingly) there weren't any.

As precedence, go/types.Identical ignores receiver parameters when
comparing go/types.Signature values.

Notably, this allows us to slightly simplify the "implements"
function, which is used for checking whether type/interface t
implements interface iface. Currently, cmd/compile actually works
around Eqtype's receiver parameter checking by creating new throwaway
TFUNC Types without the receiver parameter.

(Worse, the compiler currently only provides APIs to build TFUNC Types
from Nod syntax trees, so building those throwaway types also involves
first building throwaway syntax trees.)

Passes toolstash -cmp.

Change-Id: Ib07289c66feacee284e016bc312e8c5ff674714f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20602
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
2016-03-17 00:38:15 +00:00
Rob Pike
501f0b578f test: commentary for [h-m]*.go
R=golang-dev, gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5674112
2012-02-23 18:47:26 +11:00
Russ Cox
57eb06fe93 test: use testlib (final 61)
X ,s;^// \$G (\$D/)?\$F\.go *$;// compile;g
X ,s;^// \$G (\$D/)?\$F\.go && \$L \$F\.\$A *$;// build;g
X ,s;^// \$G (\$D/)?\$F\.go && \$L \$F\.\$A && \./\$A\.out *$;// run;g
X ,s;^// errchk \$G( -e)? (\$D/)?\$F\.go *$;// errorcheck;g

R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5671080
2012-02-16 23:51:04 -05:00
Ian Lance Taylor
68683a6a61 test: s/float/float64/
Otherwise gccgo gives an extra error message not matched by errchk.

R=adg, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4053042
2011-01-21 08:37:58 -08:00
Rob Pike
4f61fc96b2 test: remove semiocolons.
The ken directory is untouched so we have some examples with explicit semis.

R=gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/2157041
2010-09-04 10:36:13 +10:00
Ian Lance Taylor
8bbe748b84 Enable these tests. Fix divconst.go and modconst.go to
compile with the current compiler.  Adjust expected error
message in method1.go to match 6g output.

R=rsc
DELTA=9  (2 added, 5 deleted, 2 changed)
OCL=33674
CL=33682
2009-08-21 15:43:23 -07:00
Rob Pike
74dd0ab670 fix up some irregular indentation
R=rsc
OCL=33382
CL=33391
2009-08-17 13:30:22 -07:00
Russ Cox
839a68469b delete export
TBR=r
OCL=23121
CL=23127
2009-01-20 14:40:40 -08:00
Russ Cox
f48cbfdf56 convert tests; nothing interesting.
R=r
OCL=23012
CL=23014
2009-01-16 16:12:14 -08:00
Ian Lance Taylor
9c9cc2c9d8 Recognize gccgo error messages. This uses GCCGO_ERROR, which
is recognized by the gccgo testsuite but is ignored by the
errchk script used with 6g.

method1.go:7:1: error: redefinition of 'M': parameter types changed
method1.go:6:1: note: previous definition of 'M' was here
method1.go:10:1: error: redefinition of 'f': parameter types changed
method1.go:9:1: note: previous definition of 'f' was here
method1.go:13:1: error: redefinition of 'g': parameter names changed
method1.go:12:1: note: previous definition of 'g' was here

R=rsc
DELTA=5  (0 added, 0 deleted, 5 changed)
OCL=18962
CL=19058
2008-11-11 18:18:34 -08:00
Russ Cox
689b28fd96 fix method function type compare bug (again)
R=ken
OCL=17819
CL=17819
2008-10-24 14:56:54 -07:00