Use a small python script to consolidate duplicate
ppc64/ppc64le tests into a single ppc64x codegen test.
This makes small assumption that anytime two tests with
for different arch/variant combos exists, those tests
can be combined into a single ppc64x test.
E.x:
// ppc64le: foo
// ppc64le/power9: foo
into
// ppc64x: foo
or
// ppc64: foo
// ppc64le: foo
into
// ppc64x: foo
import glob
import re
files = glob.glob("codegen/*.go")
for file in files:
with open(file) as f:
text = [l for l in f]
i = 0
while i < len(text):
first = re.match("\s*// ?ppc64(le)?(/power[89])?:(.*)", text[i])
if first:
j = i+1
while j < len(text):
second = re.match("\s*// ?ppc64(le)?(/power[89])?:(.*)", text[j])
if not second:
break
if (not first.group(2) or first.group(2) == second.group(2)) and first.group(3) == second.group(3):
text[i] = re.sub(" ?ppc64(le|x)?"," ppc64x",text[i])
text=text[:j] + (text[j+1:])
else:
j += 1
i+=1
with open(file, 'w') as f:
f.write("".join(text))
Change-Id: Ic6b009b54eacaadc5a23db9c5a3bf7331b595821
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/463220
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
make\(\[\][a-zA-Z0-9]+, 0\) is seen 52 times in the go source.
And at least 391 times on internet:
https://grep.app/search?q=make%5C%28%5C%5B%5C%5D%5Ba-zA-Z0-9%5D%2B%2C%200%5C%29®exp=true
This used to compile to calling runtime.makeslice.
However we can copy what we do for []T{}, just use a zerobase pointer.
On my machine this is 10x faster (from 3ns to 0.3ns).
Note that an empty loop also runs in 0.3ns,
so this really is free when you count superscallar execution.
Change-Id: I1cfe7e69f5a7a4dabbc71912ce6a4f8a2d4a7f3c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/454036
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Jakub Ciolek <jakub@ciolek.dev>
Updated multiple tests in test/codegen: math.go, mathbits.go, shift.go
and slices.go to verify on ppc64/ppc64le as well
Change-Id: Id88dd41569b7097819fb4d451b615f69cf7f7a94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/412115
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Archana Ravindar <aravind5@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
We don't need a multiply when the element type is size 0 or 1.
The panic functions don't return, so we don't need any post-call
code (register restores, etc.).
Change-Id: I0dcea5df56d29d7be26554ddca966b3903c672e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/419754
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Some codegen tests were written with the assumption that
arguments and results are in memory, and with a specific stack
layout. With the register ABI, the assumption is no longer true.
Adjust the tests to work with both cases.
- For tests expecting in memory arguments/results, change to use
global variables or memory-assigned argument/results.
- Allow more registers. E.g. some tests expecting register names
contain only letters (e.g. AX), but it can also contain numbers
(e.g. R10).
- Some instruction selection changes when operate on register vs.
memory, e.g. ADDQ vs. LEAQ, MOVB vs. MOVL. Accept both.
TODO: mathbits.go and memops.go still need fix.
Change-Id: Ic5932b4b5dd3f5d30ed078d296476b641420c4c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/309335
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
This merges an lis + subf into subfic, and for 32b constants
lwa + subf into oris + ori + subf.
The carry bit is no longer used in code generation, therefore
I think we can clobber it as needed. Note, lowered borrow/carry
arithmetic is self-contained and thus is not affected.
A few extra rules are added to ensure early transformations to
SUBFCconst don't trip up earlier rules, fold constant operations,
or otherwise simplify lowering. Likewise, tests are added to
ensure all rules are hit. Generic constant folding catches
trivial cases, however some lowering rules insert arithmetic
which can introduce new opportunities (e.g BitLen or Slicemask).
I couldn't find a specific benchmark to demonstrate noteworthy
improvements, but this is generating subfic in many of the default
bent test binaries, so we are at least saving a little code space.
Change-Id: Iad7c6e5767eaa9dc24dc1c989bd1c8cfe1982012
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/249461
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
match:
m = make([]T, x); copy(m, s)
for pointer free T and x==len(s) rewrite to:
m = mallocgc(x*elemsize(T), nil, false); memmove(&m, &s, x*elemsize(T))
otherwise rewrite to:
m = makeslicecopy([]T, x, s)
This avoids memclear and shading of pointers in the newly created slice
before the copy.
With this CL "s" is only be allowed to bev a variable and not a more
complex expression. This restriction could be lifted in future versions
of this optimization when it can be proven that "s" is not referencing "m".
Triggers 450 times during make.bash..
Reduces go binary size by ~8 kbyte.
name old time/op new time/op delta
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Byte 71.1ns ± 1% 65.8ns ± 0% -7.49% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Int 71.2ns ± 1% 66.0ns ± 0% -7.27% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Ptr 104ns ± 4% 99ns ± 1% -5.13% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Byte 70.3ns ± 0% 68.0ns ± 0% -3.22% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Int 70.3ns ± 0% 68.5ns ± 1% -2.59% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Ptr 102ns ± 0% 99ns ± 1% -2.97% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Byte 75.4ns ± 0% 74.9ns ± 2% -0.63% (p=0.015 n=9+9)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Int 75.6ns ± 0% 76.4ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.245 n=9+10)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Ptr 107ns ± 0% 108ns ± 1% +0.93% (p=0.005 n=9+10)
Fixes#26252
Change-Id: Iec553dd1fef6ded16197216a472351c8799a8e71
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/146719
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
golang.org/cl/109517 optimized the compiler to avoid the allocation for make in
append(x, make([]T, y)...). This was only implemented for the case that y has type int.
This change extends the optimization to trigger for all integer types where the value
is known at compile time to fit into an int.
name old time/op new time/op delta
ExtendInt-12 106ns ± 4% 106ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.351 n=10+6)
ExtendUint64-12 1.03µs ± 5% 0.10µs ± 4% -90.01% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
ExtendInt-12 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal)
ExtendUint64-12 13.6kB ± 0% 0.0kB -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
ExtendInt-12 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
ExtendUint64-12 1.00 ± 0% 0.00 -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Updates #29785
Change-Id: Ief7760097c285abd591712da98c5b02bc3961fcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/182559
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
var a []int = ...
p := &a[0]
_ = *p
We don't need to nil check on the 3rd line. If the bounds check on the 2nd
line passes, we know p is non-nil.
We rely on the fact that any cap>0 slice has a non-nil pointer as its
pointer to the backing array. This is true for all safely-constructed slices,
and I don't see any reason why someone would violate this rule using unsafe.
R=go1.13
Fixes#30366
Change-Id: I3ed764fcb72cfe1fbf963d8c1a82e24e3b6dead7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/163740
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Rename memclrrange to signify that it does not handle
all types of range clears.
Simplify checks to detect the range clear idiom for
arrays and slices.
Add tests to verify the optimization for the slice
range clear idiom is being applied by the compiler.
Change-Id: I5c3b7c9a479699ebdb4c407fde692f30f377860c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110477
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
