These changes are enough to pass all.bash using the
disabled linux-amd64-alpine builder via debugnewvm.
For #19938.
For #39857.
Change-Id: I7d160612259c77764b70d429ad94f0864689cdce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/419995
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
CL 294430 made packages in std and cmd modules use Go 1.17 gofmt format,
adding //go:build lines. This change applies the same formatting to some
more packages that 'go fmt' missed (e.g., syscall/js, runtime/msan), and
everything else that is easy and safe to modify in bulk.
Consider the top-level test directory, testdata, and vendor directories
out of scope, since there are many files that don't follow strict gofmt
formatting, often for intentional and legitimate reasons (testing gofmt
itself, invalid Go programs that shouldn't crash the compiler, etc.).
That makes it easy and safe to gofmt -w the .go files that are found
with gofmt -l with aforementioned directories filtered out:
$ gofmt -l . 2>/dev/null | \
grep -v '^test/' | \
grep -v '/testdata/' | \
grep -v '/vendor/' | wc -l
51
None of the 51 files are generated. After this change, the same command
prints 0.
For #41184.
Change-Id: Ia96ee2a0f998d6a167d4473bcad17ad09bc1d86e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/341009
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
The test previously had the hardcoded assumption that /proc/self/status
files had "Groups:" lines containing numerical IDs in ascending order.
Because of the possibility of non-monotonic ordering of GIDs in user
namespaces, this assumption was not universally true for all
/proc/self/gid_map setups.
To ensure this test can pass in those setups, sanity check failed
"Groups:" line matches with a string sorted version of the expected
values. (For the test cases here, numerical and string sorted order
are guaranteed to match.)
Fixes#46145
Change-Id: Ia060e80b123604bc394a15c02582fc406f944d36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/319591
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
Update references missed in CL 263142.
For #41190
Change-Id: I778760a6a69bd0440fec0848bdef539c9ccb4ee1
GitHub-Last-Rev: dda42b09ff
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#42874
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273946
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TestSetuidEtc() was failing sporadically on linux-ppc64. From the
three https://build.golang.org/ logs, it looked like the logged
errors could be associated with threads dying, but proc reads
were, in some way, racing with their demise.
Exploring ways to increase thread demise, revealed that races
of this type can happen on non-ppc64 systems, and that
os.IsNotExist(err) was not a sufficient error condition test
for a thread's status file disappearing. This change includes a
fix for that to.
The actual issue on linux-ppc64 appears to be tied to PID reaping
and reuse latency on whatever the build test environment is for
linux-ppc64-buildlet. I suspect this can happen on any linux
system, however, especially where the container has a limited PID
range.
The fix for this, limited to the test (the runtime syscall support
is unchanged), is to confirm that the Pid for the interrogated
thread's /proc/<TID>/status file confirms that it is still
associated with the test-process' PID.
linux-ppc64-buildlet:
go/bin/go test syscall -run=TestSetuidEtc -count=10000
ok syscall 104.285s
Fixes#42462
Change-Id: I55c84ab8361003570a405fa52ffec4949bf91113
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/268717
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
This change adds two new methods for invoking system calls
under Linux: syscall.AllThreadsSyscall() and
syscall.AllThreadsSyscall6().
These system call wrappers ensure that all OSThreads mirror
a common system call. The wrappers serialize execution of the
runtime to ensure no race conditions where any Go code observes
a non-atomic OS state change. As such, the syscalls have
higher runtime overhead than regular system calls, and only
need to be used where such thread (or 'm' in the parlance
of the runtime sources) consistency is required.
The new support is used to enable these functions under Linux:
syscall.Setegid(), syscall.Seteuid(), syscall.Setgroups(),
syscall.Setgid(), syscall.Setregid(), syscall.Setreuid(),
syscall.Setresgid(), syscall.Setresuid() and syscall.Setuid().
They work identically to their glibc counterparts.
Extensive discussion of the background issue addressed in this
patch can be found here:
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/1435
In the case where cgo is used, the C runtime can launch pthreads that
are not managed by the Go runtime. As such, the added
syscall.AllThreadsSyscall*() return ENOTSUP when cgo is enabled.
However, for the 9 syscall.Set*() functions listed above, when cgo is
active, these functions redirect to invoke their C.set*() equivalents
in glibc, which wraps the raw system calls with a nptl:setxid fixup
mechanism. This achieves POSIX semantics for these functions in the
combined Go and C runtime.
As a side note, the glibc/nptl:setxid support (2019-11-30) does not
extend to all security related system calls under Linux so using
native Go (CGO_ENABLED=0) and these AllThreadsSyscall*()s, where
needed, will yield more well defined/consistent behavior over all
threads of a Go program. That is, using the
syscall.AllThreadsSyscall*() wrappers for things like setting state
through SYS_PRCTL and SYS_CAPSET etc.
Fixes#1435
Change-Id: Ib1a3e16b9180f64223196a32fc0f9dce14d9105c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/210639
Trust: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
