Russ Cox
06a6b3a413
test/locklinear: deflake again
...
On overloaded machines once we get to big N, the machine slowness dominates.
But we only retry once we get to a big N.
Instead, retry for small N too, and die on the first big N that fails.
Change-Id: I3ab9cfb88832ad86e2ba1389a926045091268aeb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37543
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2017-03-06 15:05:42 +00:00
Russ Cox
990124da2a
runtime: use balanced tree for addr lookup in semaphore implementation
...
CL 36792 fixed #17953 , a linear scan caused by n goroutines piling into
two different locks that hashed to the same bucket in the semaphore table.
In that CL, n goroutines contending for 2 unfortunately chosen locks
went from O(n²) to O(n).
This CL fixes a different linear scan, when n goroutines are contending for
n/2 different locks that all hash to the same bucket in the semaphore table.
In this CL, n goroutines contending for n/2 unfortunately chosen locks
goes from O(n²) to O(n log n). This case is much less likely, but any linear
scan eventually hurts, so we might as well fix it while the problem is fresh
in our minds.
The new test in this CL checks for both linear scans.
The effect of this CL on the sync benchmarks is negligible
(but it fixes the new test).
name old time/op new time/op delta
Cond1-48 576ns ±10% 575ns ±13% ~ (p=0.679 n=71+71)
Cond2-48 1.59µs ± 8% 1.61µs ± 9% ~ (p=0.107 n=73+69)
Cond4-48 4.56µs ± 7% 4.55µs ± 7% ~ (p=0.670 n=74+72)
Cond8-48 9.87µs ± 9% 9.90µs ± 7% ~ (p=0.507 n=69+73)
Cond16-48 20.4µs ± 7% 20.4µs ±10% ~ (p=0.588 n=69+71)
Cond32-48 45.4µs ±10% 45.4µs ±14% ~ (p=0.944 n=73+73)
UncontendedSemaphore-48 19.7ns ±12% 19.7ns ± 8% ~ (p=0.589 n=65+63)
ContendedSemaphore-48 55.4ns ±26% 54.9ns ±32% ~ (p=0.441 n=75+75)
MutexUncontended-48 0.63ns ± 0% 0.63ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Mutex-48 210ns ± 6% 213ns ±10% +1.30% (p=0.035 n=70+74)
MutexSlack-48 210ns ± 7% 211ns ± 9% ~ (p=0.184 n=71+72)
MutexWork-48 299ns ± 5% 300ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.678 n=73+75)
MutexWorkSlack-48 302ns ± 6% 300ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.149 n=74+72)
MutexNoSpin-48 135ns ± 6% 135ns ±10% ~ (p=0.788 n=67+75)
MutexSpin-48 693ns ± 5% 689ns ± 6% ~ (p=0.092 n=65+74)
Once-48 0.22ns ±25% 0.22ns ±24% ~ (p=0.882 n=74+73)
Pool-48 5.88ns ±36% 5.79ns ±24% ~ (p=0.655 n=69+69)
PoolOverflow-48 4.79µs ±18% 4.87µs ±20% ~ (p=0.233 n=75+75)
SemaUncontended-48 0.80ns ± 1% 0.82ns ± 8% +2.46% (p=0.000 n=60+74)
SemaSyntNonblock-48 103ns ± 4% 102ns ± 5% -1.11% (p=0.003 n=75+75)
SemaSyntBlock-48 104ns ± 4% 104ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.231 n=71+75)
SemaWorkNonblock-48 128ns ± 4% 129ns ± 6% +1.51% (p=0.000 n=63+75)
SemaWorkBlock-48 129ns ± 8% 130ns ± 7% ~ (p=0.072 n=75+74)
RWMutexUncontended-48 2.35ns ± 1% 2.35ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.144 n=70+55)
RWMutexWrite100-48 139ns ±18% 141ns ±21% ~ (p=0.071 n=75+73)
RWMutexWrite10-48 145ns ± 9% 145ns ± 8% ~ (p=0.553 n=75+75)
RWMutexWorkWrite100-48 297ns ±13% 297ns ±15% ~ (p=0.519 n=75+74)
RWMutexWorkWrite10-48 588ns ± 7% 585ns ± 5% ~ (p=0.173 n=73+70)
WaitGroupUncontended-48 0.87ns ± 0% 0.87ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
WaitGroupAddDone-48 63.2ns ± 4% 62.7ns ± 4% -0.82% (p=0.027 n=72+75)
WaitGroupAddDoneWork-48 109ns ± 5% 109ns ± 4% ~ (p=0.233 n=75+75)
WaitGroupWait-48 0.17ns ± 0% 0.16ns ±16% -8.55% (p=0.000 n=56+75)
WaitGroupWaitWork-48 1.78ns ± 1% 2.08ns ± 5% +16.92% (p=0.000 n=74+70)
WaitGroupActuallyWait-48 52.0ns ± 3% 50.6ns ± 5% -2.70% (p=0.000 n=71+69)
https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20170215.1
Change-Id: Ia29a8bd006c089e401ec4297c3038cca656bcd0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37103
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2017-02-16 17:52:15 +00:00
