The FAQ already has a link to the release notes and the go command docs.
Add a link from the release notes to the go command docs, to ensure that
people ultimately end up there (the docs that then signpost
people to the relevant other help docs).
Updates #25517.
Change-Id: I284c84af712d4519c59f7ca6c396b05a4c967cee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/126777
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Add the tools section with a Gofmt sub-section, just like in
go1.10.html. Instead of copying the two last paragraphs from 1.10, which
warn users about the hidden complexity of enforcing gofmt, move that to
go/format and link to it.
While at it, remove a duplicate "Tools" header that was likely added by
accident.
Fixes#26228.
Change-Id: Ic511c44b2b86f82a41f2b78dd7e7482d694b6c62
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122295
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Change-Id: I3bcf8850ad3873f2627ba017cbfb8b7a8c9cf467
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125256
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The backwards incompatible changes were undone in CL 120355, while still
preserving the additions needed for assignments in templates to work.
Change-Id: Ie76a798916ef36509c88e171a04bb2cf2a3d7e8e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124917
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
The final API uses 'region' instead of 'span' from the proposal.
Change-Id: I305da891a360596fff89b10bc6de3090289b5396
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124815
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Text based on CL 124655.
Change-Id: I7c4866ce829cb28a4c60cd8ced3ef99047a38c54
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124711
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This doesn't auto-deploy to golang.org, only tip.golang.org.
Change-Id: I112743ada2c1393e21edcc9075127f40da9e6270
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124755
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Mention the change in the behavior of go test -memprofile.
Change-Id: I0384f058298bd8fcfd2d97996464d46b4e419938
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124656
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Missed in CL 124516.
Change-Id: I6488196c8392987d69eca832ab4969aaafe1a26c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124658
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The change to make the runtime use libSystem.so macOS instead of
direct kernel calls applies to iOS as well.
Change-Id: I97ea86452ac5f7433aea58bbd3ff53a2eb2835e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/124657
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Since Go1.10, go test runs vet on the tests before executing them.
Moreover, the vet tool typechecks the package under analysis with
go/types before running. In Go1.10, a typechecking failure just caused
a warning to be printed. In Go1.11, a typechecking failure will cause
vet to exit with a fatal error (see Issue #21287).
This means that starting with Go1.11, tests that don't typecheck will
fail immediately. This would not normally be an issue, since a test
that doesn't typecheck shouldn't even compile, and it should already
be broken.
Unfortunately, there's a bug in gc that makes it accept programs with
unused variables inside a closure (Issue #3059). This means that a
test with an unused variable inside a closure, that compiled and
passed in Go1.10, will fail in the typechecking step of vet starting
with Go1.11.
Explain this in the 1.11 release notes.
Fixes#26109
Change-Id: I970c1033ab6bc985d8c64bd24f56e854af155f96
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121455
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Change "have to" to "need to" for clarity and to avoid a
peculiar English idiom.
Change-Id: Iec2b1f841d0353dd7925f8f934fe82d4ed059d7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/123495
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
It will not be present in go1.11beta1 but will be present
in subsequent releases.
Change-Id: I298fb682945345bb4a34ec83802fd644f75bdd98
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/120756
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
It's more common to specify GOOS/GOARCH values in that order,
rather than the inverse. Fix the order.
Updates #18892.
Change-Id: I8551508599e019f6617dc007397b562c9926418d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/120057
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
