fixedbugs/bug13343.go:10:12: error: initialization expressions for ‘b’ and ‘c’ depend upon each other
fixedbugs/bug13343.go:11:9: note: ‘c’ defined here
fixedbugs/bug13343.go:11:9: error: initialization expression for ‘c’ depends upon itself
fixedbugs/bug13343.go:11:9: error: initialization expressions for ‘c’ and ‘b’ depend upon each other
fixedbugs/bug13343.go:10:12: note: ‘b’ defined here
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:24:10: error: reference to method ‘Do’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:25:10: error: reference to method ‘do’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:27:10: error: reference to method ‘Dont’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:28:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘Dont’
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:31:10: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘do’
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:33:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘do’
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:34:10: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘Dont’
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:35:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘Dont’
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:37:10: error: reference to method ‘Do’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:38:10: error: reference to method ‘do’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:40:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘do’
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:41:10: error: reference to method ‘Dont’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:42:13: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘Dont’
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:43:10: error: reference to method ‘secret’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
fixedbugs/issue10700.dir/test.go:44:13: error: reference to unexported field or method ‘secret’
fixedbugs/issue10975.go:13:9: error: interface contains embedded non-interface
fixedbugs/issue11326.go:26:17: error: floating-point constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue11326.go:27:17: error: floating-point constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue11326.go:28:17: error: floating-point constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue11361.go:9:11: error: import file ‘fmt’ not found
fixedbugs/issue11361.go:11:11: error: reference to undefined name ‘fmt’
fixedbugs/issue11371.go:12:15: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue11371.go:13:15: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue11371.go:17:15: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:9:17: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:9:17: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:10:22: error: complex real part overflow
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:10:22: error: complex real part overflow
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:11:23: error: complex real part overflow
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:11:23: error: complex real part overflow
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:9:19: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:10:24: error: complex real part overflow
fixedbugs/issue11590.go:11:25: error: complex real part overflow
fixedbugs/issue11610.go:11:7: error: import path is empty
fixedbugs/issue11610.go:12:4: error: invalid character 0x3f in input file
fixedbugs/issue11610.go:14:1: error: expected identifier
fixedbugs/issue11610.go:14:1: error: expected type
fixedbugs/issue11614.go:14:9: error: interface contains embedded non-interface
fixedbugs/issue13248.go:13:1: error: expected operand
fixedbugs/issue13248.go:13:1: error: missing ‘)’
fixedbugs/issue13248.go:12:5: error: reference to undefined name ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue13266.go:10:8: error: package name must be an identifier
fixedbugs/issue13266.go:10:8: error: expected ‘;’ or newline after package clause
fixedbugs/issue13266.go:10:8: error: expected declaration
fixedbugs/issue13273.go:50:18: error: expected ‘chan’
fixedbugs/issue13273.go:53:24: error: expected ‘chan’
fixedbugs/issue13274.go:11:58: error: expected ‘}’
fixedbugs/issue13365.go:14:19: error: index expression is negative
fixedbugs/issue13365.go:15:21: error: index expression is negative
fixedbugs/issue13365.go:16:22: error: index expression is negative
fixedbugs/issue13365.go:19:13: error: some element keys in composite literal are out of range
fixedbugs/issue13365.go:22:19: error: incompatible type for element 1 in composite literal
fixedbugs/issue13365.go:23:21: error: incompatible type for element 1 in composite literal
fixedbugs/issue13365.go:24:22: error: incompatible type for element 1 in composite literal
fixedbugs/issue13415.go:14:5: error: redefinition of ‘x’
fixedbugs/issue13415.go:14:5: note: previous definition of ‘x’ was here
fixedbugs/issue13415.go:14:5: error: ‘x’ declared but not used
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:12:25: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:13:25: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:14:25: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:15:24: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:16:23: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:18:26: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:19:26: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:20:26: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:21:25: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:22:24: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13471.go:24:24: error: floating-point constant truncated to integer
fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:18:12: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:19:13: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:20:13: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:21:13: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:22:13: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue13821b.go:24:12: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:24:18: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:30:18: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:37:22: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:43:22: error: expected ‘;’ or ‘}’ or newline
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:59:17: note: previous definition of ‘labelname’ was here
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:64:17: error: label ‘labelname’ already defined
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:24:17: error: value computed is not used
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:30:17: error: value computed is not used
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:37:20: error: value computed is not used
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:43:20: error: value computed is not used
fixedbugs/issue14006.go:59:17: error: label ‘labelname’ defined and not used
fixedbugs/issue14010.go:13:14: error: invalid left hand side of assignment
fixedbugs/issue14010.go:14:14: error: invalid left hand side of assignment
fixedbugs/issue14010.go:14:9: error: invalid use of type
fixedbugs/issue14321.go:30:10: error: method ‘F’ is ambiguous in type ‘C’
fixedbugs/issue14321.go:31:10: error: ‘G’ is ambiguous via ‘A’ and ‘B’
fixedbugs/issue14321.go:33:10: error: type ‘C’ has no method ‘I’
fixedbugs/issue8183.go:12:14: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue9036.go:21:12: error: invalid prefix for floating constant
fixedbugs/issue9036.go:22:12: error: invalid prefix for floating constant
fixedbugs/issue9076.go:14:5: error: incompatible type in initialization (cannot use type uintptr as type int32)
fixedbugs/issue9076.go:15:5: error: incompatible type in initialization (cannot use type uintptr as type int32)
For issue9083.go avoid an error about a variable that is set but not used.
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:105:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:106:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:107:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:108:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:109:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:110:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:112:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:113:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:114:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:115:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:116:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:117:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:119:13: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:119:18: error: cannot use ‘_’ as value
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:36:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:39:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:43:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:46:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:50:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:53:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:56:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:57:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:58:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:59:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:60:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:61:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:65:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:68:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:70:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:71:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:72:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:73:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:74:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:75:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:77:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:78:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:79:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:80:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:81:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:82:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:84:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:85:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:86:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:87:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:88:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:89:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:91:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:92:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:93:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:94:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:95:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:96:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:98:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:99:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go💯15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:101:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:102:15: error: invalid operation (func can only be compared to nil)
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:103:15: error: invalid comparison of non-ordered type
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:121:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:122:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:123:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
fixedbugs/issue9370.go:124:15: error: incompatible types in binary expression
Change-Id: I4089de4919112b08f5f2bbec20f84fcc7dbe3955
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/276832
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
It just makes the compiler crash. Oops.
Fixes#43099
Change-Id: Id996c14799c1a5d0063ecae3b8770568161c2440
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/276652
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The gofrontend code would in some circumstances incorrectly generate a
type descriptor for an alias type, causing the type to fail to be
equal to the unaliased type.
Change-Id: I47d33b0bfde3c72a9a186049539732bdd5a6a96e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/275632
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
An address of offset(SP) may point to the callee args area, and
may be used to move things into/out of the args/results. If an
address like that is spilled and picked up by the GC, it may hold
an arg/result live in the callee, which may not actually be live
(e.g. a result not initialized at function entry). Make sure
they are rematerializeable, so they are always short-lived and
never picked up by the GC.
This CL changes 386, PPC64, and Wasm. On AMD64 we already have
the rule (line 2159). On other architectures, we already have
similar rules like
(OffPtr [off] ptr:(SP)) => (MOVDaddr [int32(off)] ptr)
to avoid this problem. (Probably me in the past had run into
this...)
Fixes#42944.
Change-Id: Id2ec73ac08f8df1829a9a7ceb8f749d67fe86d1e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/275174
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
assign.go:59:28: error: ‘x’ repeated on left side of :=
assign.go:65:20: error: ‘a’ repeated on left side of :=
method2.go:36:11: error: reference to method ‘val’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
method2.go:37:11: error: reference to method ‘val’ in type that is pointer to interface, not interface
Change-Id: I8f385c75a82fae4eacf4618df8f9f65932826494
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274447
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Now that filepath.WalkDir is available, it is more efficient
and should be used in place of filepath.Walk.
Update the tree to reflect best practices.
As usual, the code compiled with Go 1.4 during bootstrap is excluded.
(In this CL, that's only cmd/dist.)
For #42027.
Change-Id: Ib0f7b1e43e50b789052f9835a63ced701d8c411c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/267719
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The gofrontend code doesn't distinguish semicolon and newline,
and it doesn't have special treatment for EOF.
syntax/semi6.go:9:47: error: unexpected semicolon or newline in type declaration
syntax/semi6.go:11:62: error: unexpected semicolon or newline in type declaration
Change-Id: I9996b59a4fc78ad1935e779f354ddf75c0fb44e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274692
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
These replacement rules assume that TST and TEQ set V. But TST and
TEQ do not set V. This is a problem because instructions like LT are
actually checking for N!=V. But with TST and TEQ not setting V, LT
doesn't do anything meaningful. It's possible to construct trivial
miscompilations from this, such as:
package main
var x = [4]int32{-0x7fffffff, 0x7fffffff, 2, 4}
func main() {
if x[0] > x[1] {
panic("fail 1")
}
if x[2]&x[3] < 0 {
panic("fail 2") // Fails here
}
}
That first comparison sets V, via the CMP that subtracts the values
causing the overflow. Then the second comparison operation thinks that
it uses the result of TST, when it actually uses the V from CMP.
Before this fix:
TST R0, R1
BLT loc_6C164
After this fix:
TST R0, R1
BMI loc_6C164
The BMI instruction checks the N flag, which TST sets. This commit
fixes the issue by using [LG][TE]noov instead of vanilla [LG][TE], and
also adds a test case for the direct issue.
Fixes#42876.
Change-Id: I13c62c88d18574247ad002b671b38d2d0b0fc6fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274026
Run-TryBot: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Trust: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
This matches the error messages after CL 273890.
syntax/semi4.go:11:9: error: unexpected semicolon or newline, expecting ‘{’ after for clause
syntax/semi4.go:10:13: error: reference to undefined name ‘x’
syntax/semi4.go:12:17: error: reference to undefined name ‘z’
Change-Id: Ic88ff6e27d50bf70f5b2114383b84c42c0682f39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273891
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
shift1.go:76:16: error: shift of non-integer operand
shift1.go:77:16: error: shift of non-integer operand
Change-Id: I48584c0b01f9f6912a93b5f9bba55b5803fbeced
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273888
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
As of https://golang.org/cl/273886:
fixedbugs/bug340.go:15:18: error: reference to method ‘x’ in interface with no methods
For golang/go#10700
Change-Id: Id29eb0e34bbb524117614229c4c27cfd17dae286
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273887
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
These changes match the following gofrontend error messages:
blank1.go:16:1: error: may not define methods on non-local type
chan/perm.go:28:9: error: expected channel
chan/perm.go:29:11: error: left operand of ‘<-’ must be channel
chan/perm.go:69:9: error: argument must be channel
complit1.go:25:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:26:16: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:27:17: error: attempt to slice object that is not array, slice, or string
complit1.go:49:41: error: may only omit types within composite literals of slice, array, or map type
complit1.go:50:14: error: expected struct, slice, array, or map type for composite literal
convlit.go:24:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type string)
convlit.go:25:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type float64)
convlit.go:26:9: error: invalid type conversion (cannot use type unsafe.Pointer as type int)
ddd1.go:63:9: error: invalid use of ‘...’ calling non-variadic function
fixedbugs/bug176.go:12:18: error: index expression is not integer constant
fixedbugs/bug332.go:17:10: error: use of undefined type ‘T’
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:22:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:33:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:44:25: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4232.go:55:16: error: integer constant overflow
fixedbugs/issue4458.go:19:14: error: type has no method ‘foo’
fixedbugs/issue5172.go:24:14: error: too many expressions for struct
init.go:17:9: error: reference to undefined name ‘runtime’
initializerr.go:26:29: error: duplicate value for index 1
interface/explicit.go:60:14: error: type assertion only valid for interface types
label.go:64:9: error: reference to undefined label ‘go2’
label1.go:18:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:22:97: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:106:89: error: continue statement not within for
label1.go:108:26: error: invalid continue label ‘on’
label1.go:111:118: error: break statement not within for or switch or select
label1.go:113:23: error: invalid break label ‘dance’
map1.go:64:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:65:9: error: not enough arguments
map1.go:67:9: error: argument 1 must be a map
method2.go:36:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:37:11: error: reference to undefined field or method ‘val’
method2.go:41:12: error: method requires pointer (use ‘(*T).g’)
syntax/chan1.go:13:19: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
syntax/chan1.go:17:11: error: send statement used as value; use select for non-blocking send
Change-Id: I98047b60a376e3d2788836300f7fcac3f2c285cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/273527
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
CL 271906 allows loading single field of typed-interface{} OpIData, but
it does not update the corresponding selector type. So the generated
OpLoad has the named type instead, prevent it from being lowered by
lower pass.
Fixes#42784
Change-Id: Idf32e4f711731be09d508dd712b60bc8c58309bd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/272466
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The bug was introduced by https://golang.org/cl/220844.
Fixes#42790.
Change-Id: I44d619a1a4d3f2aee1c5575d5cfddcc4ba10895f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/272666
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This issue was already fixed at tip. Just adding the test that
failed on 1.14/1.15.
Update #42753
Change-Id: I00d13ade476b9c17190d762d7fdcb30cf6c83954
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/272029
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Same reason as CL 270057, but for OpLoad.
Fixes#42727
Change-Id: Iebb1a8110f29427a0aed3b5e3e84f0540de3d1b7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/271906
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
When inlining a function call expression, it's possible that the
function callee subexpression has side effects that need to be
preserved. This used to not be an issue, because inlining wouldn't
recognize these as inlinable anyway. But golang.org/cl/266199 extended
the inlining logic to recognize more cases, but did not notice that
the actual inlining code was discarding side effects.
Issue identified by danscales@.
Fixes#42703.
Change-Id: I95f8fc076b6ca4e9362e80ec26dad9d87a5bc44a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/271219
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Within the frontend, we generally don't guarantee uniqueness of
anonymous types. For example, each struct type literal gets
represented by its own types.Type instance.
However, the field tracking code was using the struct type as a map
key. This broke in golang.org/cl/256457, because that CL started
changing the inlined parameter variables from using the types.Type of
the declared parameter to that of the call site argument. These are
always identical types (e.g., types.Identical would report true), but
they can be different pointer values, causing the map lookup to fail.
The easiest fix is to simply get rid of the map and instead use
Node.Opt for tracking the types.Field. To mitigate against more latent
field tracking failures (e.g., if any other code were to start trying
to use Opt on ODOT/ODOTPTR fields), we store this field
unconditionally. I also expect having the types.Field will be useful
to other frontend code in the future.
Finally, to make it easier to test field tracking without having to
run make.bash with GOEXPERIMENT=fieldtrack, this commit adds a
-d=fieldtrack flag as an alternative way to enable field tracking
within the compiler. See also #42681.
Fixes#42686.
Change-Id: I6923d206d5e2cab1e6798cba36cae96c1eeaea55
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/271217
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Some rules for PPC64 were checking for a case
where a shift followed by an 'and' of a mask could
be lowered, depending on the format of the mask. The
function to verify if the mask was valid for this purpose
was not checking if the mask was 0 which we don't want to
allow. This case can happen if previous optimizations
resulted in that mask value.
This fixes isPPC64ValidShiftMask to check for a mask of 0 and return
false.
This also adds a codegen testcase to verify it doesn't try to
match the rules in the future.
Fixes#42610
Change-Id: I565d94e88495f51321ab365d6388c01e791b4dbb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/270358
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.org>
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
mips SRA/SLL/SRL shift amounts are used mod 32; this change aligns the
XXXconst rules to mask the shift amount by &31.
Passes
$ GOARCH=mips go build -toolexec 'toolstash -cmp' -a std
$ GOARCH=mipsle go build -toolexec 'toolstash -cmp' -a std
Fixes#42587
Change-Id: I6003ebd0bc500fba4cf6fb10254e1b557bf8c48f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/270117
Trust: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
In certain cases, the declkared type of an OpIData is interface{}.
This was not expected (since interface{} is a pair, right?) and
thus caused a crash. What is intended is that these be treated as
a byteptr, so do that instead (this is what happens in 1.15).
Fixes#42568.
Change-Id: Id7c9e5dc2cbb5d7c71c6748832491ea62b0b339f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/270057
Trust: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
When a variable symbol is both imported (possibly through
inlining) and linkname'd, make sure its LSym is marked as
non-package for symbol indexing in the object file, so it is
resolved by name and dedup'd with the original definition.
Fixes#42401.
Change-Id: I8e90c0418c6f46a048945c5fdc06c022b77ed68d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/268178
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Faller <jeremy@golang.org>
Fixes#42445
Change-Id: I9653ef094dba2a1ac2e3daaa98279d10df17a2a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/268257
Trust: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Trust: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
CL 244579 added guard clauses to prevent a faulty state that was
possible under the incorrect logic of the uniquePred loop in
addLocalInductiveFacts. That faulty state was still making the
intended optimization, but not for the correct reason.
Removing the faulty state also removed the overly permissive application
of the optimization, and therefore made these two tests fail.
We disabled the tests of this optimization in CL 244579 to allow us to
quickly apply the fix in the CL. This CL now corrects the logic of the
uniquePred loop in order to apply the optimization correctly.
The comment above the uniquePred loop says that it will follow unique
predecessors until it reaches a join point. Without updating the child
node on each iteration, it cannot follow the chain of unique
predecessors more than one step. Adding the update to the child node
on each iteration of the loop allows the logic to follow the chain of
unique predecessors until reaching a join point (because a non-unique
predecessor will signify a join point).
Updates #40502.
Change-Id: I23d8367046a2ab3ce4be969631f9ba15dc533e6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/246157
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Trust: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
This CL adds support for inlining type switches, including exporting
and importing them.
Type switches are represented mostly the same as expression switches.
However, if the type switch guard includes a short variable
declaration, then there are two differences: (1) there's an ONONAME
(in the OTYPESW's Left) to represent the overall pseudo declaration;
and (2) there's an ONAME (in each OCASE's Rlist) to represent the
per-case variables.
For simplicity, this CL simply writes out each variable separately
using iimport/iiexport's normal Vargen mechanism for disambiguating
identically named variables within a function. This could be improved
somewhat, but inlinable type switches are probably too uncommon to
merit the complexity.
While here, remove "case OCASE" from typecheck1. We only type check
"case" clauses as part of a "select" or "switch" statement, never as
standalone statements.
Fixes#37837
Change-Id: I8f42f6c9afdd821d6202af4a6bf1dbcbba0ef424
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266203
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Optimize combinations of left and right shifts by a constant value
into a 'rotate then insert selected bits [into zero]' instruction.
Use the same instruction for contiguous masks since it has some
benefits over 'and immediate' (not restricted to 32-bits, does not
overwrite source register).
To keep the complexity of this change under control I've only
implemented 64 bit operations for now.
There are a lot more optimizations that can be done with this
instruction family. However, since their function overlaps with other
instructions we need to be somewhat careful not to break existing
optimization rules by creating optimization dead ends. This is
particularly true of the load/store merging rules which contain lots
of zero extensions and shifts.
This CL does interfere with the store merging rules when an operand
is shifted left before it is stored:
binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(b, x << 1)
This is unfortunate but it's not critical and somewhat complex so
I plan to fix that in a follow up CL.
file before after Δ %
addr2line 4117446 4117282 -164 -0.004%
api 4945184 4942752 -2432 -0.049%
asm 4998079 4991891 -6188 -0.124%
buildid 2685158 2684074 -1084 -0.040%
cgo 4553732 4553394 -338 -0.007%
compile 19294446 19245070 -49376 -0.256%
cover 4897105 4891319 -5786 -0.118%
dist 3544389 3542785 -1604 -0.045%
doc 3926795 3927617 +822 +0.021%
fix 3302958 3293868 -9090 -0.275%
link 6546274 6543456 -2818 -0.043%
nm 4102021 4100825 -1196 -0.029%
objdump 4542431 4548483 +6052 +0.133%
pack 2482465 2416389 -66076 -2.662%
pprof 13366541 13363915 -2626 -0.020%
test2json 2829007 2761515 -67492 -2.386%
trace 10216164 10219684 +3520 +0.034%
vet 6773956 6773572 -384 -0.006%
total 107124151 106917891 -206260 -0.193%
Change-Id: I7591cce41e06867ba10a745daae9333513062746
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/233317
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
We already remove racefuncenter and racefuncexit if they are not
needed (i.e. the function doesn't have any other race calls).
racefuncenterfp is like racefuncenter but used on LR machines.
Remove unnecessary racefuncenterfp as well.
Change-Id: I65edb00e19c6d9ab55a204cbbb93e9fb710559f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/267099
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
In golang.org/cl/266199, I reused the existing code in inlining that
recognizes anonymous variables. However, it turns out that code
mistakenly recognizes anonymous return parameters as named when
inlining a function from the same package.
The issue is funcargs (which is only used for functions parsed from
source) synthesizes ~r names for anonymous return parameters, but
funcargs2 (which is only used for functions imported from export data)
does not.
This CL fixes the behavior so that anonymous return parameters are
handled identically whether a function is inlined within the same
package or across packages. It also adds a proper cross-package test
case demonstrating #33160 is fixed in both cases.
Change-Id: Iaa39a23f5666979a1f5ca6d09fc8c398e55b784c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266719
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
reassignVisitor was short-circuiting on assignment statements after
checking the LHS, but there might be further assignment statements
nested within the RHS expressions.
Fixes#42284.
Change-Id: I175eef87513b973ed5ebe6a6527adb9766dde6cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266618
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
A method selector expression can pick out a method or promoted method
(represented by ODOTMETH), but it can also pick out an interface
method from an embedded interface-typed field (represented by
ODOTINTER).
In the case that we're picking out an interface method, we're not able
to fully devirtualize the method call. However, we're still able to
improve escape analysis somewhat. E.g., the included test case
demonstrates that we can optimize "i.M()" to "i.(T).I.M()", which
means the T literal can be stack allocated instead of heap allocated.
Fixes#42279.
Change-Id: Ifa21d19011e2f008d84f9624b7055b4676b6d188
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266300
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
After inlining, add a pass that looks for interface calls where we can
statically determine the interface value's concrete type. If such a
case is found, insert an explicit type assertion to the concrete type
so that escape analysis can see it.
Fixes#33160.
Change-Id: I36932c691693f0069e34384086d63133e249b06b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/264837
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The inlining pass previously bailed upon encountering a go or defer statement, so it would not inline functions e.g. used to provide arguments to the deferred function. This change preserves the behavior of not inlining the
deferred function itself, but it allows the inlining walk to proceed into its arguments.
Fixes#42194
Change-Id: I4e82029d8dcbe69019cc83ae63a4b29af45ec777
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/264997
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
With previous CLs, internal linking without cgo should work well.
Enable it by default. And stop always requiring cgo.
Enable tests that were previously disabled due to the lack of
internal linking.
Updates #38485.
Change-Id: I45125b9c263fd21d6847aa6b14ecaea3a2989b29
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/265121
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
pointers to go:notinheap types should be treated as scalars. That
means they shouldn't be stored directly in interfaces, or directly
in reflect.Value.ptr.
Also be sure to use uintpr to compare such pointers in reflect.DeepEqual.
Fixes#42076
Change-Id: I53735f6d434e9c3108d4940bd1bae14c61ef2a74
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/264480
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
storeType splits compound stores up into a scalar parts and a pointer parts.
The scalar part happens unconditionally, and the pointer part happens
under the guard of a write barrier check.
Types which are declared as pointers, but are represented as scalars because
they might have "bad" values, were not handled correctly here. They ended
up not getting stored in either set.
Fixes#42032
Change-Id: I46f6600075c0c370e640b807066247237f93c7ac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/264300
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Combine (AND m (SRWconst x)) or (SRWconst (AND m x)) when mask m is
and the shift value produce constant which can be encoded into an
RLWINM instruction.
Combine (CLRLSLDI (SRWconst x)) if the combining of the underling rotate
masks produces a constant which can be encoded into RLWINM.
Likewise for (SLDconst (SRWconst x)) and (CLRLSDI (RLWINM x)).
Combine rotate word + and operations which can be encoded as a single
RLWINM/RLWNM instruction.
The most notable performance improvements arise from the crypto
benchmarks below (GOARCH=power8 on a ppc64le/linux):
pkg:golang.org/x/crypto/blowfish goos:linux goarch:ppc64le
ExpandKeyWithSalt 52.2µs ± 0% 47.5µs ± 0% -8.88%
ExpandKey 44.4µs ± 0% 40.3µs ± 0% -9.15%
pkg:golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/internal/bcrypt_pbkdf goos:linux goarch:ppc64le
Key 57.6ms ± 0% 52.3ms ± 0% -9.13%
pkg:golang.org/x/crypto/bcrypt goos:linux goarch:ppc64le
Equal 90.9ms ± 0% 82.6ms ± 0% -9.13%
DefaultCost 91.0ms ± 0% 82.7ms ± 0% -9.12%
Change-Id: I59a0ca29face38f4ab46e37124c32906f216c4ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/260798
Run-TryBot: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.com>
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Currently, "x &^ y" gets rewriten into "x & ^y" during walk. It adds
unnecessary complexity to other parts, which must aware about this.
Instead, we can just implement "&^" in the conversion to SSA, so "&^"
can be handled like other binary operators.
However, this CL does not pass toolstash-check. It seems that implements
"&^" in the conversion to SSA causes registers allocation change.
With the parent:
obj: 00212 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) MOVQ X0, AX
obj: 00213 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) BTRQ $63, AX
obj: 00214 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) MOVQ "".n(SP), CX
obj: 00215 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) MOVQ $-9223372036854775808, DX
obj: 00216 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) ANDQ DX, CX
obj: 00217 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) ORQ AX, CX
With this CL:
obj: 00212 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) MOVQ X0, AX
obj: 00213 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) BTRQ $63, AX
obj: 00214 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) MOVQ $-9223372036854775808, CX
obj: 00215 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) MOVQ "".n(SP), DX
obj: 00216 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) ANDQ CX, DX
obj: 00217 (.../src/runtime/complex.go:47) ORQ AX, DX
Change-Id: I80acf8496a91be4804fb7ef3df04c19baae2754c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/264660
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
For follow up CL, which will defer lowering OANDNOT until SSA.
Change-Id: I5a988d0b8f0ae664580f08b123811b2a31ef55c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/265040
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
We never supported symbol larger than 2GB (issue #9862), so the
object file uses 32-bit for symbol sizes. Check and reject too
large symbol before truncating its size.
Fixes#42054.
Change-Id: I0d1d585ebdba9556f2fd3a97043bd4296d5cc9e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/263641
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
This helps the compiler reports the right place where the type declared,
instead of relying on global lineno, which maybe set to wrong value at
the time the error is reported.
Fixes#42058
Change-Id: I06d34aa9b0236d122f4a0d72e66675ded022baac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/263597
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
OCALLPART is exported in its original form, which is as an OXDOT.
The body of the method value wrapper created in makepartialcall() was
not being typechecked, and that was causing a problem during escape
analysis, so I added code to typecheck the body.
The go executable got slightly bigger with this change (13598111 ->
13598905), because of extra exported methods with OCALLPART (I
believe), while the text size got slightly smaller (9686964 ->
9686643).
This is mainly part of the work to make sure all function bodies can
be exported (for purposes of generics), but might as well fix the
OCALLPART inlining bug as well.
Fixes#18493
Change-Id: If7aa055ff78ed7a6330c6a1e22f836ec567d04fd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/263620
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
asNode(t.Nod).Name.Param will be nil for builtin types (i.e., the
universal predeclared types and unsafe.Pointer). These types can't be
part of a cycle anyway, so we can just skip them.
Fixes#42075.
Change-Id: Ic7a44de65c6bfd16936545dee25e36de8850acf3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/263717
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Before generating wrapper function, turn any f(a, b, []T{c, d, e}...)
calls back into f(a, b, c, d, e). This allows the existing code for
recognizing and specially handling unsafe.Pointer->uintptr conversions
to correctly handle variadic arguments too.
Fixes#41460.
Change-Id: I0a1255abdd1bd5dafd3e89547aedd4aec878394c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/263297
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
This CL replaces the ad hoc and duplicated logic for detecting
inlinable calls with a single "inlCallee" function, which uses the
"staticValue" helper function introduced in an earlier commit.
Updates #41474.
Change-Id: I103d4091b10366fce1344ef2501222b7df68f21d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/256460
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
We already allow inlining "if" and "goto" statements, so we might as
well allow "for" loops too. The majority of frontend support is
already there too.
The critical missing feature at the moment is that inlining doesn't
properly reassociate OLABEL nodes with their control statement (e.g.,
OFOR) after inlining. This eventually causes SSA construction to fail.
As a workaround, this CL only enables inlining for unlabeled "for"
loops. It's left to a (yet unplanned) future CL to add support for
labeled "for" loops.
The increased opportunity for inlining leads to a small growth in
binary size. For example:
$ size go.old go.new
text data bss dec hex filename
9740163 320064 230656 10290883 9d06c3 go.old
9793399 320064 230656 10344119 9dd6b7 go.new
Updates #14768.
Fixes#41474.
Change-Id: I827db0b2b9d9fa2934db05caf6baa463f0cd032a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/256459
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Escape analysis is currently very naive about identifying calls to
known functions: it only recognizes direct calls to a declared
function, or direct calls to a closure.
This CL adds a new "staticValue" helper function that can trace back
through local variables that were initialized and never reassigned
based on a similar optimization already used by inlining. (And to be
used by inlining in a followup CL.)
Updates #41474.
Change-Id: I8204fd3b1e150ab77a27f583985cf099a8572b2e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/256458
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The gofrontend code doesn't correctly handle inlining a function that
refers to a constant with methods.
For #35739
Change-Id: I6bd0b5cd4272dbe9969634b4821e668acacfdcf9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/261662
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
We are converting from using error-prone ad-hoc syntax // +build lines
to less error-prone, standard boolean syntax //go:build lines.
The timeline is:
Go 1.16: prepare for transition
- Builds still use // +build for file selection.
- Source files may not contain //go:build without // +build.
- Builds fail when a source file contains //go:build lines without // +build lines. <<<
Go 1.17: start transition
- Builds prefer //go:build for file selection, falling back to // +build
for files containing only // +build.
- Source files may contain //go:build without // +build (but they won't build with Go 1.16).
- Gofmt moves //go:build and // +build lines to proper file locations.
- Gofmt introduces //go:build lines into files with only // +build lines.
- Go vet rejects files with mismatched //go:build and // +build lines.
Go 1.18: complete transition
- Go fix removes // +build lines, leaving behind equivalent // +build lines.
This CL provides part of the <<< marked line above in the Go 1.16 step:
rejecting files containing //go:build but not // +build.
The standard go command checks only consider the top of the file.
This compiler check, along with a separate go vet check for ignored files,
handles the remainder of the file.
For #41184.
Change-Id: I014006eebfc84ab5943de18bc90449e534f150a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/240601
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
We lost a sign extension that was necessary. The nonnegative comparison
didn't have the correct extension on it. If the larger constant is
positive, but its shorter sign extension is negative, the rule breaks.
Fixes#41872
Change-Id: I6592ef103f840fbb786bf8cb94fd8804c760c976
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/260701
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
