In situations like:
var buf bytes.Buffer
var w io.Writer = &b<>
if we want to complete to "buf" properly we need to apply the "&" type
modifier to buf's type of bytes.Buffer to see that it is assignable
to type io.Writer. Previously we applied type modifiers in reverse to
the "expected" type (io.Writer in this case), but that is obviously
incorrect in this situation since it is nonsensical to
dereference (the reverse of "&") io.Writer.
Change-Id: Ib7ab5761f625217e023286384c23b8c60e677aac
GitHub-Last-Rev: 4be528f2572c9c987334552e3f8a31d4eddce81a
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#121
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/182598
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When checking if a completion candidate matches the expected type at
the cursor position, we now use types.AssignableTo instead of
types.Identical. This properly handles cases like using a concrete
type to satisfy an interface type.
Calling AssignableTo triggered some crashes related to the fake
"resolved" types we create. Their underlying type was nil, which is
not allowed. We now set their underlying type to the invalid type.
I've also rearranged things so expected type information lives in a
dedicated typeInference struct. For now there is no new information added,
but in subsequent commits there will be more metadata about the
expected type.
Change-Id: I14e537c548960c30e444cf512a4413d75bb3ee45
GitHub-Last-Rev: 7e64ebe32938562648938d7a480195d954b018f2
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#116
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/182358
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
