This CL implements the math/bits.OnesCount{8,16,32,64} functions
as intrinsics on s390x using the 'population count' (popcnt)
instruction. This instruction was released as the 'population-count'
facility which uses the same facility bit (45) as the
'distinct-operands' facility which is a pre-requisite for Go on
s390x. We can therefore use it without a feature check.
The s390x popcnt instruction treats a 64 bit register as a vector
of 8 bytes, summing the number of ones in each byte individually.
It then writes the results to the corresponding bytes in the
output register. Therefore to implement OnesCount{16,32,64} we
need to sum the individual byte counts using some extra
instructions. To do this efficiently I've added some additional
pseudo operations to the s390x SSA backend.
Unlike other architectures the new instruction sequence is faster
for OnesCount8, so that is implemented using the intrinsic.
name old time/op new time/op delta
OnesCount 3.21ns ± 1% 1.35ns ± 0% -58.00% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
OnesCount8 0.91ns ± 1% 0.81ns ± 0% -11.43% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
OnesCount16 1.51ns ± 3% 1.21ns ± 0% -19.71% (p=0.000 n=20+17)
OnesCount32 1.91ns ± 0% 1.12ns ± 1% -41.60% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
OnesCount64 3.18ns ± 4% 1.35ns ± 0% -57.52% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Change-Id: Id54f0bd28b6db9a887ad12c0d72fcc168ef9c4e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/114675
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
On amd64, Ctz must include special handling of zeros.
But the prove pass has enough information to detect whether the input
is non-zero, allowing a more efficient lowering.
Introduce new CtzNonZero ops to capture and use this information.
Benchmark code:
func BenchmarkVisitBits(b *testing.B) {
b.Run("8", func(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
x := uint8(0xff)
for x != 0 {
sink = bits.TrailingZeros8(x)
x &= x - 1
}
}
})
// and similarly so for 16, 32, 64
}
name old time/op new time/op delta
VisitBits/8-8 7.27ns ± 4% 5.58ns ± 4% -23.35% (p=0.000 n=28+26)
VisitBits/16-8 14.7ns ± 7% 10.5ns ± 4% -28.43% (p=0.000 n=30+28)
VisitBits/32-8 27.6ns ± 8% 19.3ns ± 3% -30.14% (p=0.000 n=30+26)
VisitBits/64-8 44.0ns ±11% 38.0ns ± 5% -13.48% (p=0.000 n=30+30)
Fixes#25077
Change-Id: Ie6e5bd86baf39ee8a4ca7cadcf56d934e047f957
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/109358
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The previous change sped up the pure computation form of LeadingZeros8.
This places it somewhat close to the table lookup form.
Depending on something that varies from toolchain to toolchain
(alignment, perhaps?), the slowdown from ditching the table lookup
is either 20% or 5%.
This benchmark is the best case scenario for the table lookup:
It is in the L1 cache already.
I think we're close enough that we can switch to the computational version,
and trust that the memory effects and binary size savings will be worth it.
Code:
func f8(x uint8) { z = bits.LeadingZeros8(x) }
Before:
"".f8 STEXT nosplit size=34 args=0x8 locals=0x0
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) TEXT "".f8(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) FUNCDATA $0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) FUNCDATA $1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX "".x+8(SP), AX
0x0005 00005 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX AL, AX
0x0008 00008 (x.go:7) LEAQ math/bits.len8tab(SB), CX
0x000f 00015 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX (CX)(AX*1), AX
0x0013 00019 (x.go:7) ADDQ $-8, AX
0x0017 00023 (x.go:7) NEGQ AX
0x001a 00026 (x.go:7) MOVQ AX, "".z(SB)
0x0021 00033 (x.go:7) RET
After:
"".f8 STEXT nosplit size=30 args=0x8 locals=0x0
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) TEXT "".f8(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) FUNCDATA $0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) FUNCDATA $1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX "".x+8(SP), AX
0x0005 00005 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX AL, AX
0x0008 00008 (x.go:7) LEAL 1(AX)(AX*1), AX
0x000c 00012 (x.go:7) BSRL AX, AX
0x000f 00015 (x.go:7) ADDQ $-8, AX
0x0013 00019 (x.go:7) NEGQ AX
0x0016 00022 (x.go:7) MOVQ AX, "".z(SB)
0x001d 00029 (x.go:7) RET
Change-Id: Icc7db50a7820fb9a3da8a816d6b6940d7f8e193e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108942
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Only RotateLeft{64,32} were tested, and just for ppc64. This CL adds
tests for RotateLeft{64,32,16,8} on arm64 and amd64/386, for the cases
where the calls are actually instrinsified.
RotateLeft tests (the last ones for math/bits functions) are deleted
from asm_test.
This CL also adds a space between the "//" and the arch name in the
comments, to uniform this file to the style used in all the other
files.
Change-Id: Ifc2a27261d70bcc294b4ec64490d8367f62d2b89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/99596
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
And remove them from ssa_test.
Change-Id: If767af662801219774d1bdb787c77edfa6067770
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98976
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
And remove them from ssa_test.
Change-Id: I3efac5fea529bb0efa2dae32124530482ba5058e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98815
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
And remove them from ssa_test.
Change-Id: Ib5de5c0d908f23915e0847eca338cacf2fa5325b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98795
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
This change move bits.Len* intrinsification tests to the new codegen
test harness, removing them from the old ssa_test file. Five different
test functions (one for each bit.Len function tested) was used, to
avoid possible unwanted interactions between multiple calls inside one
function.
Change-Id: Iffd5be55b58e88597fa30a562a28dacb01236d8b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98156
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
