On systems that use kqueue, we always register descriptors for both
EVFILT_READ and EVFILT_WRITE. On at least FreeBSD and OpenBSD, when
the write end of a pipe is registered for EVFILT_READ and EVFILT_WRITE
events, and the read end of the pipe is closed, kqueue reports an
EVFILT_READ event with EV_EOF set, but does not report an EVFILT_WRITE
event. Since the write to the pipe is waiting for an EVFILT_WRITE
event, closing the read end of a pipe can cause the write end to hang
rather than attempt another write which will fail with EPIPE.
Fix this by treating EVFILT_READ with EV_EOF set as making both reads
and writes ready to proceed.
The real test for this is in CL 71770, which tests using various
timeouts with pipes.
Updates #22114
Change-Id: Ib23fbaaddbccd8eee77bdf18f27a7f0aa50e2742
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71973
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
It turns out that the second argument for sigaction on Darwin has a
different type than the first argument. The second argument is the user
visible sigaction struct, and does not have the sa_tramp field.
I base this on
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-1081.1.3/sys/sigaction.c
not to mention actual testing.
While I was at it I removed a useless memclr in setsig, a relic of the C
code.
This CL is Darwin-specific changes. The tests for this CL are in
https://golang.org/cl/17903 .
Change-Id: I61fe305c72311df6a589b49ad7b6e49b6960ca24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18015
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Currently, Darwin's siginfo type uses *byte for the si_addr
field. This results in unwanted write barriers in set_sigaddr. It's
also pointless since it never points to anything real and the get/set
methods return/take uintXX and cast it from/to the pointer.
All other arches use a uint type for this field. Change Darwin to
match. This simplifies the get/set methods and eliminates the unwanted
write barriers.
Change-Id: Ifdb5646d35e1f2f6808b87a3d59745ec9718add1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8086
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
