This CL re-introduces useLHS because we don't want to suppress
correct "declared but not used" errors for variables that only
appear on the LHS of an assignment (using Checker.use would mark
them as used).
This CL also adjusts a couple of places where types2 differed
from go/types (and suppressed valid "declared and not used"
errors). Now those errors are surfaced. Adjusted a handful of
tests accordingly.
Change-Id: Ia555139a05049887aeeec9e5221b1f41432c1a57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/478635
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Agressively mark all LHS variables in assignments as used if there
is any error in the (entire) assignment. This reduces the number of
spurious "declared but not used" errors in programs that are invalid
in the first place. This behavior is closer to the behavior of the
compiler's original type checker (types1) and lets us remove lines
of the form "_ = variable" just to satisfy test cases. It also makes
more important errors visible by not crowding them out.
Remove the Checker.useLHS function and use Checker.use instead:
useLHS didn't evaluate top-level variables, but we actually want
them to be evaluated in an error scenario so that they are getting
used (and thus we don't get the "declared but not used" error).
Fixes#42937.
Change-Id: Idda460f6b81c66735bf9fd597c54188949bf12b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/351730
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
With this CL, the first ~500 errorcheck tests pass when running
go run run.go -v -G
in the $GOROOT/test directory (the log output includes a few dozen
tests that are currently skipped).
Change-Id: I9eaa2319fb39a090df54f8699ddc29ffe58b1bf1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274975
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
bug039.go:6:7: error: redefinition of 'x'
bug039.go:5:1: note: previous definition of 'x' was here
bug049.go:6:9: error: incompatible types in binary expression
bug062.go:6:7: error: incompatible type in initialization
bug086.go:5:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function
bug103.go:8:2: error: variable has no type
bug121.go:9:2: error: expected signature or type name
bug131.go:7:7: error: incompatible type in initialization
bug165.go:10:8: error: expected complete type
bug171.go:5:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function
bug171.go:6:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function
bug172.go:7:6: error: expected integer type
bug182.go:7:2: error: if statement expects boolean expression
bug183.go:10:5: error: incompatible types in assignment
bug183.go:19:5: error: incompatible types in assignment
R=rsc
DELTA=15 (0 added, 0 deleted, 15 changed)
OCL=33168
CL=33175
let errchk exit 0 even if it has reported a BUG.
it echoed BUG and that's all that matters.
R=r
DELTA=143 (1 added, 89 deleted, 53 changed)
OCL=32533
CL=32542
