Some tests disabled, some bifurcated into _ssa and not,
with appropriate logging added to compiler.
"tests/live.go" in particular needs attention.
SSA-specific testing removed, since it's all SSA now.
Added "-run_skips" option to tests/run.go to simplify
checking whether a test still fails (or how it fails)
on a skipped platform.
The compiler now compiles with SSA by default.
If you don't want SSA, specify GOSSAHASH=n (or N) as
an environment variable. Function names ending in "_ssa"
are always SSA-compiled.
GOSSAFUNC=fname retains its "SSA for fname, log to ssa.html"
GOSSAPKG=pkg only has an effect when GOSSAHASH=n
GOSSAHASH=10101 etc retains its name-hash-matching behavior
for purposes of debugging.
See #13068
Change-Id: I8217bfeb34173533eaeb391b5f6935483c7d6b43
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16299
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Modified GOSSA{HASH.PKG} environment variable filters to
make it easier to make/run with all SSA for testing.
Disable attempts at SSA for architectures that are not
amd64 (avoid spurious errors/unimplementeds.)
Removed easy out for unimplemented features.
Add convert op for proper liveness in presence of uintptr
to/from unsafe.Pointer conversions.
Tweaked stack sizes to get a pass on windows;
1024 instead 768, was observed to pass at least once.
Change-Id: Ida3800afcda67d529e3b1cf48ca4a3f0fa48b2c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16201
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Apply static bounds checking logic during type checking even to
zero-element arrays, but skip synthesized OINDEX nodes that the
compiler has asserted are within bounds (such as the ones generated
while desugaring ORANGE nodes). This matches the logic in walkexpr
that also skips static bounds checking when Bounded is true.
Passes toolstash/buildall.
Fixes#12944.
Change-Id: I14ba03d71c002bf969d69783bec8d1a8e10e7d75
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15902
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Following the C to Go translation, some useless variables
were left in the code. In fmt.go, this was harmless.
In lex.go, it broke the error message related to
non-canonical import paths.
Fix it, and remove the useless variables.
The added test case is ignored in the go/types tests, since
the behavior of the non-canonical import path check seems
to be different.
Fixes#11362
Change-Id: Ic9129139ede90357dc79ebf167af638cf44536fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15580
Reviewed-by: Marvin Stenger <marvin.stenger94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This lets us re-enable duffzero.
Fixes#12108
Change-Id: Iefd24d26eaa56067caa2c29ff99cd20a42d8714a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14937
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The current heap sampling introduces some bias that interferes
with unsampling, producing unexpected heap profiles.
The solution is to use a Poisson process to generate the
sampling points, using the formulas described at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_process
This fixes#12620
Change-Id: If2400809ed3c41de504dd6cff06be14e476ff96c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14590
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Turns out the summary information for the ... args was
already correctly computed, all that lacked was to make
use of it and correct tests that documented our prior
deficiencies.
Fixes#12006
Change-Id: Ie8adfab7547f179391d470679598f0904aabf9f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15200
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Internal error arose from calling methodfunc on a invalid interface
field during the implements check. int obviously isn't a function,
and errors on getinarg...
for im := iface.Type; im != nil; im = im.Down {
imtype = methodfunc(im.Type, nil)
// ...
}
Fix handles the internal compiler error, but does not throw an
additional error, i.e. the following code will error on the I
interface, but type A will pass the implements check since
'Read(string) string' is implemented and 'int' is skipped
type I interface {
Read(string) string
int
}
type A struct {
}
func (a *A) Read(s string) string {
return s
}
func New() I {
return new(A)
}
Fixes#10975
Change-Id: I4b54013afb2814db3f315515f0c742d8631ca500
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13747
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing test did not take into account the implicit
dereference of &fixedArray and thus heap-escaped when it
was not necessary.
Also added a detailed test for this and related cases.
Fixes#12588
Change-Id: I951e9684a093082ccdca47710f69f4366bd6b3cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15130
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
As detailed in #11910, the current implementation attempts to execute an area
of memory with unknown content. If the memory is executable, the result is
unpredictable - instead, make the test deterministic by attempting to execute
an instruction that is known to trigger a trap on the given architecture.
The new implementation is written by iant@ and provided via #11910.
Update issue #11910
Change-Id: Ia698c36e0dd98a9d9d16a701f60f6748c6faf896
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15058
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <jsing@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
For variables which get SSA'd, SSA keeps track of all the def/kill.
It is only for on-stack variables that we need them.
This reduces stack frame sizes significantly because often the
only use of a variable was a varkill, and without that last use
the variable doesn't get allocated in the frame at all.
Fixes#12602
Change-Id: I3f00a768aa5ddd8d7772f375b25f846086a3e689
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14758
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
recover4 allocates 16 pages of memory via mmap, makes a 4 page hole in it with
munmap, allocates another 16 pages of memory via normal allocation and then
tries to copy from one to the other. For some reason on arm64 (but no other
platform I have tested) the second allocation sometimes causes the runtime to
ask the kernel for 4 additional pages of memory -- which the kernel satisfies
by remapping the pages that were just unmapped!
Moving the second allocation before the munmap fixes this behaviour, I can run
recover4 tens of thousands of times without failure with this fix vs a failure
rate of ~0.5% before.
Fixes#12549
Change-Id: I490b895b606897e4f7f25b1b51f5d485a366fffb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14632
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
For now, we only use typedmemmove. This can be optimized
in future CLs.
Also add a feature to help with binary searching bad compilations.
Together with GOSSAPKG, GOSSAHASH specifies the last few binary digits
of the hash of function names that should be compiled. So
GOSSAHASH=0110 means compile only those functions whose last 4 bits
of hash are 0110. By adding digits to the front we can binary search
for the function whose SSA-generated code is causing a test to fail.
Change-Id: I5a8b6b70c6f034f59e5753965234cd42ea36d524
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14530
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Add line that was inadvertently removed.
Change-Id: I99ebc1041e984e408ae5825836c28b9891d6043b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14470
Run-TryBot: Todd Neal <todd@tneal.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This matches existing behavior, see issue #2196
Change-Id: Ifa9359b7c821115389f337a57de355c5ec23be8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14261
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Evaluating args can overwrite arg area, so we can't write argsize and func
until args are evaluated.
Fixes test/recover.go, test/recover1.go, and test/fixedbugs/issue4066.go
Change-Id: I862e4934ccdb8661431bcc3e1e93817ea834ea3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14405
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Now that the standard library tests
are all passing, add the
test directory tests.
These contain a number of edge case tests
that are of particular interest for compilers.
Some kinds of tests are not well-suited
for a new backend, such as errorcheck tests.
To start, use SSA only for run and runoutput.
There are three failing tests now.
Just mark them as such for now,
so that we can prevent regressions.
This code will all be unwound once SSA
codegen matures and becomes the default.
Change-Id: Ic51e6d0cc1cd48ef1e2fe2c9a743bf0cce275200
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14344
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This one of a set of changes to make the transition away from NodeList
easier by removing cases in which NodeList doesn't act semi-trivially like a
[]*Node.
This CL was originally prepared by Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>.
This change passes go build -toolexec 'toolstash -cmp' -a std.
Change-Id: I4d041b343952f4a31f3150fd70669e08fcaa74f8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14305
Run-TryBot: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This is a first of a set of changes to make the transition away from NodeList
easier by removing cases in which NodeList doesn't act semi-trivially like a
[]*Node.
This CL was originally prepared by Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>.
This change passes go build -toolexec 'toolstash -cmp' -a std.
Change-Id: Iad10b75e42b5b24e1694407841282fa3bab2dc9f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14232
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Instead of trying to delete dead code as soon as we find it, just
mark it as dead using a PlainAndDead block kind. The deadcode pass
will do the real removal.
This way is somewhat more efficient because we don't need to mess
with successor and predecessor lists of all the dead blocks.
Fixes#12347
Change-Id: Ia42d6b5f9cdb3215a51737b3eb117c00bd439b13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14033
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The issue 12226 has been caused by the allocation of the same register
for the equality check of two byte values. The code in cgen.go freed the
register for the second operand before the allocation of the register
for the first operand.
Fixes#12226
Change-Id: Ie4dc33a488bd48a17f8ae9b497fd63c1ae390555
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13771
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently an expression like
var v = 0 >> 1000
is rejected by gc with a "stupid shift" error, while gotype
compiles it successfully.
As suggested by gri on the issue tracker, allow an rsh right
operand to be any valid uint value.
Fixes#11328
Change-Id: I6ccb3b7f842338d91fd26ae37dd4fa279d7fc440
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13777
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The reg[] array in .../gc is where truth lies. The copy in .../ARCH
is incorrect as it is mostly not updated to reflect regalloc decisions.
This bug was introduced in the rewrite
https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/7853/. The new reg[] array was
introduced in .../gc but not all of the uses were removed in the
.../ARCH directories.
Fixes#12133
Change-Id: I6364fc403cdab92d802d17f2913ba1607734037c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13630
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
ODOTTYPE should be treated a whole lot like ODOT,
but it was missing completely from the switch in
escwalk and thus escape status did not propagate
to fields.
Since interfaces are required to trigger this bug,
the test was added to escape_iface.go.
Fixes#11931.
Change-Id: Id0383981cc4b1a160f6ad447192a112eed084538
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12921
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Instead of pushing the denominator argument on the stack,
the denominator is now passed in m.
This fixes a variety of bugs related to trying to take stack traces
backwards from the middle of the software div/mod routines.
Some of those bugs have been kludged around in the past,
but others have not. Instead of trying to patch up after breaking
the stack, this CL stops breaking the stack.
This is an update of https://golang.org/cl/19810043,
which was rolled back in https://golang.org/cl/20350043.
The problem in the original CL was that there were divisions
at bad times, when m was not available. These were divisions
by constant denominators, either in C code or in assembly.
The Go compiler knows how to generate division by multiplication
for constant denominators, but the C compiler did not.
There is no longer any C code, so that's taken care of.
There was one problematic DIV in runtime.usleep (assembly)
but https://golang.org/cl/12898 took care of that one.
So now this approach is safe.
Reject DIV/MOD in NOSPLIT functions to keep them from
coming back.
Fixes#6681.
Fixes#6699.
Fixes#10486.
Change-Id: I09a13c76ad08ba75b3bd5d46a3eb78e66a84ab38
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12899
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The layout code has to date insisted on stack frames that are 16-aligned
including the saved LR, and it ensured this by growing the frame itself.
This breaks code that refers to values near the top of the frame by positive
offset from SP, and in general it's too magical: if you see TEXT xxx, $N,
you expect that the frame size is actually N, not sometimes N and sometimes N+8.
This led to a serious bug in the compiler where ambiguously live values
were not being zeroed correctly, which in turn triggered an assertion
in the GC about finding only valid pointers. The compiler has been
fixed to always emit aligned frames, and the hand-written assembly
has also been fixed.
Now that everything is aligned, make unaligned an error instead of
something to "fix" silently.
For #9880.
Change-Id: I05f01a9df174d64b37fa19b36a6b6c5f18d5ba2d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12848
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Russ Cox fixed this issue for other systems
in CL 12026, but the Plan 9 part was forgotten.
Fixes#11656.
Change-Id: I91c033687987ba43d13ad8f42e3fe4c7a78e6075
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12762
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This is a reprise of https://golang.org/cl/12623. In that a CL I made
a suggestion which forgot that the +build constraints in the test
directory are not the same as those supported by the go tool: in the
test directory, if a single +build line fails, the test is skipped.
(In my defense, the code I was commenting on was also wrong.)
Change-Id: I8f29392a80b1983027f9a33043c803578409d678
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12776
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Old code appended, did not play well with a closure
with a ... param.
Fixes#11075.
Change-Id: Ib7c8590c5c4e576e798837e7499e00f3494efb4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12580
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Add label and goto checks and improve test coverage.
Implement OSWITCH and OSELECT.
Implement OBREAK and OCONTINUE.
Allow generation of code in dead blocks.
Change-Id: Ibebb7c98b4b2344f46d38db7c9dce058c56beaac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12445
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
There was already special code to recognize "?" in hidden_structdcl,
which is used for inlined types and variables. This recognizes "?" in
structdcl as well, a case that arises when a struct type appears
within an inlined function body.
Fixes#10219.
Change-Id: Ic5257ae54f817e0d4a189c2294dcd633c9f2101a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12241
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>