Previously we unconditionally qualified literal candidate types with
their package. For example:
var buf *bytes.Buffer
buf = &bytes.Bu<>
would complete to:
buf = &bytes.bytes.Buffer{}
Now we don't qualify the type if the cursor position is in the
selector of an *ast.SelectorExpr. We only generate literal candidates
for type names, so if we are in a selector then we can assume it is a
package qualified type (as opposed to an object field).
We also handle the insertion of "&" for literal pointers better. If you are in
the selector of an *ast.SelectorExpr, we prepend the "&" to the beginning of the
expression rather than the selector. For example, you will end up with
"&bytes.Buffer{}" instead of "bytes.&Buffer{}".
Updates golang/go#34872.
Change-Id: I812aa809cd4e649a429853386789f80033412814
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/201200
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now we offer completion candidates for labels when completing "break",
"continue", and "goto" statements. We are reasonably smart about
filtering unusable labels, except we don't filter "goto" candidates
that jump across variable definitions.
Fixesgolang/go#33987.
Change-Id: If296a7579845aba5d86c7050ab195c35d4b147ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/197417
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In cases like "fmt.Pr<>int()" we previously would replace "Print" with
the new completion, yielding for example "fmt.Println()". Now we no
longer overwrite, yielding "fmt.Println()int()". There are some cases
where overwriting the suffix is what the user wants, but it is hard to
tell, so for now stick with the more expected behavior of not
overwriting.
Fixesgolang/go#34011.
Change-Id: I8c3ccd8948245c27b52408ad508d8e01dc163ef4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196119
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This makes it much easier to keep them up to date.
It is also less fragile against accidental changes.
Change-Id: If119f8527c0896d210650859960e77f3e0fa5a99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/197505
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In CL 192137 deep fuzzy matching was enabled by default. We also have
options independent options "deepCompletion" and "fuzzyMatching" to
control this. When fuzzy matching is disabled, case insensitive prefix
matching is used.
Provide an option, "caseSensitiveCompletion", which allows for case
sensitive prefix matching when fuzzy matching is disabled.
Change-Id: I17c8fa310b2ef79e36cc2f7303e98870690b5903
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194757
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now we always expect type names inside of *ast.FieldList. This expands
the previous func signature logic to also work for *ast.StructType
and *ast.InterfaceType. For example, we will now prefer type names in
cases like:
type myStruct struct { i i<> }
Also, fix a check for anonymous fields to make sure the field is
actually embedded. This fixes cases like this to properly have no
completions:
type myStruct struct { i<> i }
where this will still give type name completions:
type myStruct struct { i<> }
I introduced a new error type source.ErrIsDefinition so source_test.go
could avoid erroring out on tests that make sure definition
identifiers have no completions.
Fixesgolang/go#34412.
Change-Id: Ib56cb52af639f2e2b132274d1f04f8074c0d9353
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196560
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Fix objects defined in the function signature to only be completable
inside the function body. For example:
func (dog Dog) bark(d<>) { // Don't complete <> to "dog".
d<> // Do complete <> to "dog".
}
Change-Id: Ic9a2dc2ce6771212780f2d6af2221a67d203f35f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196559
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This prevents piping back to the file, a common pattern.
Multi file forms should use the unified diff.
Change-Id: I1ea140c59de24feb74a64b0cb41890536f23cd3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/197157
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
source.DiagnosticSeverity and source.CompletionItemKind are duplicated
and not worth maintaining.
Change-Id: I8d6c8621a227855309c0977da59d8c9fa53617bf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/197177
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Normally you don't want literal candidates for basic types (e.g.
"int(0)") since you can type the literal value without the type name.
One exception is if you are creating a named basic type that
implements an interface. For example:
http.Handle("/", http.FileServer(<>))
will now give "http.Dir()" as a candidate since http.Dir is a named
string type that implements the required interface http.FileSystem.
Change-Id: Id2470c45e469ea25cd0f9849cfdad19ac0e784bb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195838
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Suggested fixes was totally broken (invalid command) and many others were not in
correct sorted order.
There were lots of golden entries that were no longer used.
The regeneration script itself was broken
The definition tests are skipped, so the entries were not regenerated.
Files must have been hand edited, we probably need to document how to generate
them somewhere.
Change-Id: I1c021aeadd81f08f4572c2124f0c61912a3cd89e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196987
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Our completion tests check for a lot of different behaviors. It may be
easier to develop if we have separate tests for things like deep
completion and completion snippets.
Change-Id: I7f4b0c0e52670f2a6c00247199933fd1ffa0096f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196021
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
This commit adds support for calling rename from the gopls command
line, e.g.
$ gopls rename -w ~/tmp/foo/main.go:8:6
$ gopls rename -w ~/tmp/foo/main.go:#53
Optional arguments are:
- -w, which writes the changes back to the original file; and
- -d, which prints a unified diff to stdout
With no arguments, the changed files are printed to stdout.
It:
- adds internal/lsp/cmd/rename.go, which implements the command;
- adds "rename" to the list of commands in internal/lsp/cmd/cmd.go;
- removes the dummy test from internal/lsp/cmd/cmd_test.go; and
- adds internal/lsp/cmd/rename_test.go, which uses the existing
"golden" data to implement its tests.
Updates #32875
Change-Id: I5cab5a40b4aa26357b26b0caf4ed54dbd2284d0f
GitHub-Last-Rev: fe853d325ef91f8f911987790fcba7a5a777b6ce
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#157
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194878
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
We were recursing infinitely in cases like this:
switch true {
case true:
go foo.F<>
}
There were three things that came together to cause this:
1. We recently starting recursively fixing broken go/defer statements.
2. In this case we were failing to swap in the correct ast.Node in for
the *ast.BadStmt because we were only looking
for *ast.BlockStmt (and *ast.CaseStmt has no block).
3. After 2), we weren't returning an error so the fix() code thought
it should recurse.
Fix 2) by using reflection to swap AST nodes in a generic way. Perhaps
a bit overkill in this case, but I happened to have already written
this for an upcoming change, so I just pulled it in to fix this bug.
Fix 3) by returning an error if we fail to swap the AST nodes.
Fixesgolang/go#34353.
Change-Id: I17ff1afd52ae165c0ba9de5820dcec4cb7d756cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/196137
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now we will offer function literal completions when we know the
expected type is a function. For example:
sort.Slice(someSlice, <>)
will offer the completion "func(...) {}" which if selected will
insert:
func(i, j int) bool {<>}
I opted to use an abbreviated label "func(...) {}" because function
signatures can be quite long/verbose with all the type names in there.
The only interesting challenge is how to handle signatures that don't
name the parameters. For example,
func HandleFunc(pattern string, handler func(ResponseWriter, *Request)) {
does not name the "ResponseWriter" and "Request" parameters. I went
with a minimal effort approach where we try abbreviating the type
names, so the literal completion item for "handler" would look like:
func(<rw> ResponseWriter, <r> *Request) {<>}
where <> denote placeholders. The user can tab through quickly if they
like the abbreviations, otherwise they can rename them.
For unnamed types or if the abbreviation would duplicate a previous
abbreviation, we fall back to "_" as the parameter name. The user will
have to rename the parameter before they can use it.
One side effect of this is that we cannot support function literal
completions with unnamed parameters unless the user has enabled
snippet placeholders.
Change-Id: Ic0ec81e85cd8de79bff73314e80e722f10f8c84c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193699
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Add support for literal completion candidates such as "[]int{}" or
"make([]int, 0)". We support both named and unnamed types. I used the
existing type matching logic, so, for example, if the expected type is
an interface, we will suggest literal candidates that implement the
interface.
The literal candidates have a lower score than normal matching
candidates, so they shouldn't be disruptive in cases where you don't
want a literal candidate.
This commit adds support for slice, array, struct, map, and channel
literal candidates since they are pretty similar. Functions will be
supported in a subsequent commit.
I also added support for setting a snippet's final tab stop. This is
useful if you want the cursor to end up somewhere other than the
character after the snippet.
Change-Id: Id3b74260fff4d61703989b422267021b00cec005
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193698
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Revert my previous change to include fuzzy matches with a score of
zero. Zero scorers have some characters that match, but they are
pretty poor overall. Pulling in all the extra junk candidates was
slowing things down in certain cases.
Change-Id: I560f46903281f21b0628c9b14848cddf1e3c0a38
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195418
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Also, handle *ast.StarExpr in the identifier code. This fixes a specific
case with deep completions and documentation.
Change-Id: I630ae4e8f1c123ba1fdea85e6862ae93396e2cd4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194564
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
In api/*.txt, interface declarations are represented with lines like:
pkg container/heap, type Interface interface { Len, Less, Pop, Push, Swap }
or, when they have no exported methods:
pkg go/ast, type Expr interface, unexported methods
The latter form confuses mkstdlib into thinking that it's a method
because of the extra comma, and then it skips the interface entirely.
Running this program is a matter of seconds once per release, so rather
than trying to fix the optimization, just remove it. The parsing logic
doesn't care about the extra lines.
And the corresponding change to the copy in lsp/testdata/unimported.
Updates golang/go#34199
Change-Id: Ic34b8a47537608401e4ef6683617d797f9f50f8a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194568
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
And the corresponding change to the copy in lsp/testdata/unimported.
Change-Id: I604ae6d5217356e19bb18f7cbe69a8dd71e5f23e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194567
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Now when trying to fix *ast.BadStmt, we parse the manually extracted
expression using parser.ParseFile instead of parser.ParseExpr.
ParseFile will yield *ast.BadStmt nodes for any bad statements nested
in our first bad statement, allowing us to fix them recursively.
To turn our expression into a "valid" file we can pass to
parser.ParseFile, I wrapped it thusly:
package fake
func _() {
<our expression>
}
Change-Id: I0d4fd4ebce6450021da8e03caa11d0ae5152ea8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194342
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
I moved the "usePlaceholders" config field on to CompletionOptions.
This way the completion code generates a single snippet with a little
conditional logic based on the "WantPlaceholders" option instead of
juggling the generation of two almost identical "plain" and
"placeholder" snippets at the same time. It also reduces the work done
generating completion candidates a little.
I also made a minor tweak to the snippet builder where empty
placeholders are now always represented as e.g "${1:}" instead of
"${1}" or "${1:}", depending on if you passed a callback to
WritePlaceholder() or not.
Change-Id: Ib84cc0cd729a11b9e13ad3ac4b6fd2d82460acd5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193697
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Add a new @completePartial note that does not require you to specify
the full list of completions. This gets rid of a lot of noise when you
just want to test the relative order of some completion candidates but
don't care about all the other candidates in scope.
I changed one existing test to use @completePartial as an example.
Change-Id: I56005405477e562803f094c0cac05ef2b854ad1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192657
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Remove the wantSuggestedFixes flag, and run the flagged code
by default.
Add test cases for suggested fixes.
Generate a suggested fix to the assign analysis that suggests removing redundant assignments.
Fix the propagation of suggested fixes (using rstambler's code).
Change-Id: I342c8e0b75790518f228b00ebd2979d24338be3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193265
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Improve the existing fix-the-AST code to better identify the
expression following the "go" or "defer" keywords:
- Don't slurp the expression start outside the loop since the
expression might only have a single token.
- Set expression end to the position after the final token, not the
position of the final token.
- Track curly brace nesting to properly capture an entire "func() {}"
expression.
- Fix parent node detection to work when BadStmt isn't first statement
of block.
- Add special case to detect dangling period, e.g. "defer fmt.". We
insert phantom "_" selectors like go/parser does to prevent the
dangling "." from messing up the AST.
- Use reflect in offsetPositions so it updates positions in all node
types. This code shouldn't be called often, so I don't think
performance is a concern.
I also tweaked the function snippet code so it properly expands
"defer" and "go" expressions to function calls. It thought it didn't
have to expand since there was already a *ast.CallExpr, but the
CallExpr was faked by us and the source doesn't actually contain the
"()" calling parens.
Note that this does not work for nested go/defer statements. For
example, completions won't work properly in cases like this:
go func() {
defer fmt.<>
}
I think we can fix this as well with some more work.
Change-Id: I8f9753fda76909b0e3a83489cdea69ad04ee237a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193997
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Folding ranges need to be computed to present folding ranges that make
sense when lineFoldingOnly is true. This change computes the folding
ranges to include the lines that are contained within the start and end
parenthesis/braces when applicable.
Folding ranges are not returned when the contained nodes begin or end on
the same lines as the parenthesis/brace. This is to avoid misleading
folding ranges like the following in unformatted code:
if true {
fmt.Println("true") } else {
fmt.Println("false")
}
---folding "if true {}"--->
if true {
fmt.Println("false")
}
Change-Id: I2931d02837ad5f2dd96cc93da5ede59afd6bcdce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192678
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
If the client registers with foldingRange.lineFoldingOnly = true, only
return folding ranges that span multiple lines. Do this as they are
computed, so that if other filtering is applied later, we do not include
ranges that would go unused by the client anyway.
Change-Id: I27ea24428d25f180e26892de0f6d16c211225bf7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192477
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
FoldingRanges may be nested. Test nested folding ranges by separating
out the folding ranges by nested level and checking each level.
Change-Id: I12c72daa3e6c6b9d4959209b3a41b27e2b59866f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192398
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The existing implementation did not suggest struct field names
when running completion from within a slice literal of
pointers. Now, struct field names are suggested in that case.
Fixesgolang/go#33211
Change-Id: I6028420a9a789846b070fcc6e45ec89dc4d898d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192277
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Invert "useDeepCompletions" config flag to "disableDeepCompletion" and
separate out "disableFuzzyMatching" which reverts to the previous
prefix matching behavior.
I separated fuzzy matching tests out to a separate file so they aren't
entangled with deep completion tests. In coming up with representative
test cases I found a couple issues which I fixed:
- We were treating a fuzzy matcher score of 0 as no match, but the
matcher returns 0 for candidates that match but have no bonuses. I
changed the matcher interface so that a score of 0 counts as a
match. For example, this was preventing a pattern of "o" from
matching "foo".
- When we lower a candidate's score based on its depth, we were
subtracting a static multiplier which could result in the score
going negative. A negative score messes up future score weighting
because multiplying it by a value in the range [0, 1) makes it
bigger instead of smaller. Fix by scaling a candidate's score based
on its depth rather than subtracting a constant factor.
Updates golang/go#32754
Change-Id: Ie6f9111f1696b0d067d08f7eed7b0a338ad9cd67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192137
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Prepare rename gets the range of the identifier to rename. Returns an
error when there is no identifier to rename.
Change-Id: I5e5865bc9ff97e6a95ac4f0c48edddcfd0f9ed67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/191170
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change allows renamings of the name of an import spec.
Since there is not always explicit identifier available to select and
rename, allow renaming packages from positions within the import spec.
Change-Id: I0a8aaa92c26e1795ddb9c31a1165b2f2ee89aa34
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/191165
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
When there is an explicit name for an import spec, treat it as its own
identifier, separate from the import path.
Example:
import h "hello"
The name h is defined in that import spec, not in the package hello
it contains its own references. If asked about a position within the
import path, continue treating that as referencing the imported package.
If the position is within the name, use the identifier there that is
local to that file.
This change allows for go to definition of the explicit name to point to
itself, find all references from the import spec, and rename the
explicit name from the import spec.
Change-Id: Ia1d927a26e73f2dc450d256d71909c006bdf4c37
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/191164
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Since renaming an identifier within an import spec is not yet supported,
return an error when this is encountered. These idents from the import
spec have a nil declaration object.
Import paths that contain '.' or '/' are caught by the valid identifier check
avoiding the crash, but import paths such as "fmt" are not as fmt is a
valid identifier. This change checks if i.decl.obj is nil and returns an error
if it is to avoid the crash.
Fixesgolang/go#33768
Change-Id: I4e757b42bedffd648fc821590e4a383826200dc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/191163
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Unimported packages may be suggested as completion items. Since these
are not yet imported, they should be ranked lower than other candidates.
They also require an additional import statement to be valid, which is
provided as an AdditionalTextEdit.
Adding this import does not use astutil.AddNamedImport, to avoid
editing the current ast and work even if there are errors. Additionally,
it can be hard to determine what changes need to be made to the source
document from the ast, as astutil.AddNamedImport includes a merging
pass. Instead, the completion item simply adds another import
declaration.
Change-Id: Icbde226d843bd49ee3713cafcbd5299d51530695
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/190338
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Rename checks all of the packages that may be affected for conflicts. An
error in any of them leads to renaming error. Returning errors from
multiple packages may be confusing (for example, when there is a test
variant of a package and the same error appears twice). This change
stops after an error is found and returns that error instead of
continuing to search.
Change-Id: Ifba1feddbf8829d3aad30309154d578967e05a36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/190416
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This fix adds all packages to the renamer packages map.
Renaming performs checks on each package to make sure there are no
conflicts. If there are multiple packages, each package needs to be
checked. The packages were being incorrectly added to the map and were
all being put under a single key.
Fixesgolang/go#33664
Change-Id: I68466ce34ac49b700ce6d14ce0b53e2795926fa9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/190399
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Make use of the existing fuzzy matcher to perform server side fuzzy
completion matching. Previously the server did exact prefix matching
for completion candidates and left fancy filtering to the
client. Having the server do fuzzy matching has two main benefits:
- Deep completions now update as you type. The completion candidates
returned to the client are marked "incomplete", causing the client
to refresh the candidates after every keystroke. This lets the
server pick the most relevant set of deep completion candidates.
- All editors get fuzzy matching for free. VSCode has fuzzy matching
out of the box, but some editors either don't provide it, or it can
be difficult to set up.
I modified the fuzzy matcher to allow matches where the input doesn't
match the final segment of the candidate. For example, previously "ab"
would not match "abc.def" because the "b" in "ab" did not match the
final segment "def". I can see how this is useful when the text
matching happens in a vacuum and candidate's final segment is the most
specific part. But, in our case, we have various other methods to
order candidates, so we don't want to exclude them just because the
final segment doesn't match. For example, if we know our candidate
needs to be type "context.Context" and "foo.ctx" is of the right type,
we want to suggest "foo.ctx" as soon as the user starts inputting
"foo", even though "foo" doesn't match "ctx" at all.
Note that fuzzy matching is behind the "useDeepCompletions" config
flag for the time being.
Change-Id: Ic7674f0cf885af770c30daef472f2e3c5ac4db78
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/190099
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When it is certain we are completing a struct field name, we don't
want deep completions. The only possible completions are the remaining
field names.
I also silenced the log spam in tests by disabling the go/packages
logger and the lsp logger.
Fixesgolang/go#33614
Change-Id: Icec8d92112b1674fa7a6a21145ab710d054919b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/190097
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change fixes documentation for completion items by using cached
package and AST information to derive the documentation. We also add
testing for documentation in completion items.
Change-Id: I911fb80f5cef88640fc06a9fe474e5da403657e3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/189237
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
This is probably a better approach than showing an extra diagnostic,
since a user cannot dismiss a diagnostic.
Fixesgolang/go#33397
Change-Id: I92b9a00f51a463673993793abfd4cfb99ce69a91
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/188766
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
It should work now that go packages accepts go1.13's new go list
behavior.
Updates golang/go#33157
Change-Id: I1780210b414bc0556e10e10c8c775fbfd2922b2e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/189038
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Packages with errors may still contain files that can be formatted.
Try to format the source of the files in packages that have errors.
This change will still not format files with parse errors.
Updates golang/go#31291
Change-Id: Ia5168d7908948d201eac7f2ee28534022a2d4eb0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/187757
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
https://golang.org/issue/33157 explains the issues with overlays. The
gopls tests caught this bug, but the go/packages tests didn't, so modify
the go/packages tests correspondingly.
Change-Id: I8ea8e06e145aa2420655cbe4884e60f36acfad7b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/186299
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
There is a problem with this test failing in module mode only with the
tip of the go tree. Adding this file changes it from a pure overlay package
to one that has an extra file, which fixes it for now.
updates golang/go#33125
Change-Id: I87dae0b44691246a1f79df454afb190f944cc886
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/186259
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
